Register now to get rid of these ads!

Any one seen the new 27 Model T Bodys

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by Lucky Burton, Jul 29, 2006.

  1. Is it just me or does it look a bit odd in that rear 3/4 view, from the top of the tire area to the seat back?
     
  2. DrJ
    Joined: Mar 3, 2001
    Posts: 9,419

    DrJ
    Member

    Word, what Roadsters.com said.

    It's necessary complement is one of the French flathead V8's.
    That way SCTA will have at least two reasons to not have a competitive class for it to run in. :rolleyes:

    I know it was a lot of work and money to develop and it's great body fit, probably better than most '26-'27 Ford bodies but it's going to end up like that first steel '32 roadster body that was made and not a great success because it was a CHEVY and not a Ford.
    This has the potential to be a great STREET ROD body for guys my size. (69", 250lbs) but it's just not a FORD body replica*.

    *last time I read the rules, SCTA allows exact dimension replicas to run as stock body cars.
    I think a real HOTROD should at least potentially be of a design able to race in a dry lakes class, shouldnt it?
    I think this body would put a car in a streamliner class...
     
  3. Lucky Burton
    Joined: Dec 31, 2004
    Posts: 1,681

    Lucky Burton
    Member

    I don't think this body was made with any kind of SCTA events in mind. I wouldn't spend that kinda money on a body to build a salt racer. I think John made these bodys to be street rods especially for the bigger guys to fit into. There are alot of guy that like T's but just don't fit in them....My 2 cents.
     
  4. tjm73
    Joined: Feb 17, 2006
    Posts: 3,572

    tjm73
    Member

    No. There is no hard definition of what a "real HOTROD" is. THere are no such things as "classes"on the street. To discount a persons car becsause it wouldn't fit into a race class on the dry lakes is an insult to those that have build the cars they love.

    Also......

    Wouldn't this make it a "real HOTROD" by your so-called definition? I mean it would fit into a class for racing on the dry lakes....all be it a streamlineer class. It's still a class.
     
  5. junk runner jr
    Joined: Dec 21, 2001
    Posts: 456

    junk runner jr
    Member

    If you guys are concerned about the size of a T then you don't want one bad enough...

    6" and 300 lbs. and building a T. I'll figure out a way to fit in it.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.