Register now to get rid of these ads!

Anybody ever run a Jegs branded exhaust system?

Discussion in 'Off Topic Hot Rods & Customs' started by Mr. Sinister, Jul 10, 2025.

  1. Mr. Sinister
    Joined: Sep 3, 2008
    Posts: 1,495

    Mr. Sinister
    Member
    from Elkton, MD

    They've got a hell of a deal on a 3" kit for my 81 Camaro, but site reviews are few and mixed. My experience with their parts has been pretty good. To memory, the only bad part I've gotten from them is a flexplate for this same car, all the other stuff has been good for the money.
    Being as how this is a little more complex with all the pipe bending and whatnot, I'm a little on the fence. Anybody have any experience here?
     
  2. 19Eddy30
    Joined: Mar 27, 2011
    Posts: 3,364

    19Eddy30
    Member
    from VA

    On cheaper tub ,or any brand Pay attention to the gauge of material
    Thickness
    Tub elbows connectors @ big box auto parts stores cheap thin ,
    Even NAPA Quality down unless it's namebrand Walker

    even kits on Ebay / Amazon alway look @ ga if you are wanting Quality
    I think cheep .040 -.060
    Good is .080 plus , heavier but will last longer, & better welds if chose
     
    Mr. Sinister likes this.
  3. Mr. Sinister
    Joined: Sep 3, 2008
    Posts: 1,495

    Mr. Sinister
    Member
    from Elkton, MD

    That's good advice. The ad says 16 gauge stainless, so that's what, .060? Thin piped exhaust tends to sound tinny in my experience, but this kit comes with their deep toned mufflers which I do like.
    At least in my case this will be going on a car that might see 1000 miles a year.
     
    loudbang likes this.
  4. Bandit Billy
    Joined: Sep 16, 2014
    Posts: 15,030

    Bandit Billy
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    I bought one for a 69 camaro from Summit. Fit pretty good, the length was off a bit. It was an original looking exhaust with the transverse muffler behind the axle, the rear end cover hit the muffler on a good bump in the road. I ended up cutting the pipes and lengthening them. In the end it would have been easier to just buy mandrel bends and weld one up myself.
     
    Mr. Sinister and 19Eddy30 like this.
  5. Mr. Sinister
    Joined: Sep 3, 2008
    Posts: 1,495

    Mr. Sinister
    Member
    from Elkton, MD

    Well I have the benefit of a friend with a lift who likes installing exhausts and has a bunch of scrap pipe lying around. I think I'll take a shot on it. This is their true dual setup with the X pipe built in, and I think these cars came with a dual inlet/outlet muffler setup, so I'm expecting it to not fit 100% like factory.
     
  6. 19Eddy30
    Joined: Mar 27, 2011
    Posts: 3,364

    19Eddy30
    Member
    from VA

    I like to mock up ,install all lose , Use pole
    jacks, Mechanic wire ,
    Helps since I am one man show
     
    Mr. Sinister likes this.
  7. Mr. Sinister
    Joined: Sep 3, 2008
    Posts: 1,495

    Mr. Sinister
    Member
    from Elkton, MD

    Whoever installed this exhaust liked their mechanic's wire too!! :D
    9JiyP8C.jpeg
     
    down-the-road and 19Eddy30 like this.
  8. Bandit Billy
    Joined: Sep 16, 2014
    Posts: 15,030

    Bandit Billy
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    I've hung a lot of pipes under 1st and 2nd Gen F-bodies. Not a lot of room under there for X pipes. And dual inlet/outlet mufflers basically are X pipes, anyway the ones I used were open inside. So you kind of duplicate your efforts adding the X pipe. Something to consider.
     
    SS327 and Mr. Sinister like this.
  9. Mr. Sinister
    Joined: Sep 3, 2008
    Posts: 1,495

    Mr. Sinister
    Member
    from Elkton, MD

    What I have under it now is a true dual setup in 2.5", but it's butchered. It looks a lot like the kit Jeg's sells, minus the crossover. I've already replaced the headers in the pic with some mid lengths because the longtubes were cooking the starter. Apart from the 1/2" size difference, it SHOULD fit OK. I may or may not run tailpipes depending on clearance. My buddy has a 69 and cannot get 3" tailpipes to fit.
    Here's what's on it:
    xsVt9B4.jpeg

    Here's the Jeg's kit:
    https://www.jegs.com/i/JEGS/555/30584/10002/-1
     
  10. Bandit Billy
    Joined: Sep 16, 2014
    Posts: 15,030

    Bandit Billy
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Unless you are racing and pushing 500+ HP through it, 3" pipes aren't going to be worth the effort IMO. Those cars are tight underneath and low to the ground, not a lot of room. Magnaflow makes a nice transverse 2 into 2 muffler to fit between the tank and rear end, make a nice noise. 2.5" pipe over the axle, dump a couple of chrome or SS pipes out the quarter panels. Pypes makes probably the best fitting system I have used on F bodies. Might be a bit more money.
     
    Mr. Sinister likes this.
  11. Mr. Sinister
    Joined: Sep 3, 2008
    Posts: 1,495

    Mr. Sinister
    Member
    from Elkton, MD

    Racing? No. 500hp? Maybe. It’s a 408 with a mild cam, worked over early 400 production heads, and EFI. It’s healthy, but it’s just a cruiser. Definitely a torquey build over peak HP. I could probably do 2.5”, save a few bucks, and not have it cost any usable HP, but 3” does sound better.
    I like the Pypes stuff, I put their street pro kit on my 55 some years back and it fit like a glove.
     
    Bandit Billy likes this.
  12. Bandit Billy
    Joined: Sep 16, 2014
    Posts: 15,030

    Bandit Billy
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    They fit and they look good. I used pypes on my 442, they even had the Olds flared tips that go in the bumper recesses for 2.5" pipes, the originals are small and don't flare without splitting. On my Olds I ran 3" form the collectors to the mufflers, then 2.5" over the rear and out along the tank. I never added an X pipe. Maybe should have. I don't have one on anything at the moment come to think of it. No reason why, just don't.
     
    Mr. Sinister likes this.
  13. Mr. Sinister
    Joined: Sep 3, 2008
    Posts: 1,495

    Mr. Sinister
    Member
    from Elkton, MD

    They say the X adds a little power, but in a street cruiser, is it enough to matter? I look at it as a "as long as you're under there doing everything else" sort of thing. What I really liked, and noticed in the seat of the pants, is the old MAC Prochamber. Instead of an X or H, it was an actual chamber and it really improved torque.
    It is kinda nice to see if you have a problem cylinder, you can easily tell which side it's on with no crossover.
     
    Last edited: Jul 18, 2025 at 11:30 AM
  14. SS327
    Joined: Sep 11, 2017
    Posts: 3,610

    SS327

    Every vehicle I ever had an z pipe on always cracked in the middle of the X. No more, I’m done with them.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.