Register now to get rid of these ads!

Hot Rods Big Daddy's 55 2 door wagon gasser

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by Lloyd's paint & glass, Jul 1, 2024.

  1. I can attest to the comfort of those seats, I made several back and forth trips from Virginia to Missouri in my Hurst/Olds, 17 hrs one way sitting in them back in the mid 80's.
    I agree that they're not right for the 55 though.
     
  2. It seems like a hatchet was the most often used tool to cut shifter holes back in the day! Like, more often than not, it just didn't matter. Are you looking for a tri 5 bench? They're pricey these days. I've heard a Chevelle bench seat is close for width.
     
  3. DDDenny
    Joined: Feb 6, 2015
    Posts: 20,157

    DDDenny
    Member
    from oregon

    Thats where the license plates come in!:D
     
  4. SS327
    Joined: Sep 11, 2017
    Posts: 3,070

    SS327

    Those swivel buckets are one of the most comfortable seats GM ever made.
     
    VANDENPLAS, swade41, Sharpone and 3 others like this.
  5. enloe
    Joined: May 10, 2006
    Posts: 9,778

    enloe
    Member
    from east , tn.

    Awesome car Lloyd, I can’t wait to see it.
    It would look good with some panel paint and freak drops and lace and candy and flake and striping and and and etc.

    A cool big block would be awesome as well. :):):)
     
  6. I have a late 60's-early 70's GM bench with a split back. I forget the measurement, but I think it'll work. It was too big for the AD truck.
     
  7. We'll be in Bowling Green next year, kinda like a reunion lol... I'll be in another 2 door wagon and you'll be back in your vette :cool: 645843345.jpg
     
  8. enloe
    Joined: May 10, 2006
    Posts: 9,778

    enloe
    Member
    from east , tn.

    I may take the wagon I am unsure which it will be. I am planning on both of them being ready
     
  9. Here’s some work a friend of mine did, for wagon paint insperation
    7BEBBFFD-30DF-4036-B076-91EF627C62F9.png C5251515-C987-49D5-976E-5749559DFAF0.jpeg 875BCF79-42EF-4059-9179-5340DCAEA87B.jpeg C248F8B6-5129-4FEC-A8FF-99117C995B85.jpeg
     
  10. Anybody wanna play a game? I'm sitting at the firehouse, building engines on paper. The sucking noise you hear is money being pulled out of my wallet. Let's pretend for a moment that you're big daddy, and you have this wagon, you have a late model 454 block, crank and rods, a set of 1974 oval port heads, and a performer rpm intake. On the other hand you have a 1975 350 Chevy 4 bolt complete engine, access to a cheap set of aluminum heads, performer rpm intake, and you already have a flywheel for the 350. Which direction would you go? Big block just because it's bigger? Sbc for the economical factor? Hmmmm.... I'm finding myself going back to the sbc. I could sell my bbc heads and have a very small out of pocket investment in a set of 64cc aluminum heads. And Keith black .150 dome pistons for a sbc are on sale for $250 a set right now..... I hate being in this predicament lmao
     
  11. snoc653
    Joined: Dec 25, 2023
    Posts: 546

    snoc653
    Member
    from Iowa

    It all depends on what the goal is for the car. If the plan is build a nice car and flip it, go with the cheaper option with the most resale appeal. If you want a strictly cruiser, the nod goes to the small block. Parts are available everywhere. If you’re building it to keep, drive and occasionally take down the track, then the big block is the ticket. The big block can make respectable power without a lot of high end mods. The right cam, intake, and carb and you will just about be there for the big block.
     
  12. Hey Brother, you know what direction I would go. I’m a Small Block guy all the way. Will the firewall have to be modified to fit the big block?
     
  13. 51504bat
    Joined: May 22, 2010
    Posts: 5,154

    51504bat
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Can't really help since I'm a Ford guy but remember, "If some is good more is better!" Just saying :cool:
     
  14. I don't think so, I'll be setting the engine where I want it because I'm not using the front mounts.
     
  15. Oh absolutely, it's just money. I get it.
     
  16. 51504bat
    Joined: May 22, 2010
    Posts: 5,154

    51504bat
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Just a couple of OT shifts, Eh?
     
  17. I would rather have a stock big block over cheap aftermarket parts small block !

    The old saying you get what you pay for rings true and today's offshore parts are horrible.
     
  18. For everyday driving? Or just wow factor? I'm not gonna spend a fortune on the other parts to put behind 600ftlb of torque. I've pretty much convinced myself to stay with what I've done for the past 40 years. Anybody want a set of 781 heads that were built for a race boat? Lol
     
  19. I never do anything for the "wow factor" I usually work around what's more efficient to get the job done.
    The stock big block will make the same torque as a well built small block, big block works easier to make it too, if you have a well built big block it'll double the well built small block.
    So bang for the buck the big block is the way to go.
     
  20. Moriarity
    Joined: Apr 11, 2001
    Posts: 33,772

    Moriarity
    SUPER MODERATOR
    Staff Member

    Yup, big block makes low end and mid range torque, the kind that holds you back in your seat... small blocks make high rpm power. Go with the big block, Low rpm power is what you need on a street car, you won't be sorry. My off topic chevelle has a 73 454 with a 270 Isky cam, Edelbrock C396 intake and a 750 Holley double pumper, otherwise stock and it goes like stink and if you baby it it will get 15mpg
     
  21. poco
    Joined: Feb 9, 2009
    Posts: 1,397

    poco
    Member
    from oklahoma

    I would go with the small block, I have had both and the small block will work better for you. Don
     
  22. Johnny Gee
    Joined: Dec 3, 2009
    Posts: 13,459

    Johnny Gee
    Member
    from Downey, Ca

  23. DDDenny
    Joined: Feb 6, 2015
    Posts: 20,157

    DDDenny
    Member
    from oregon

    I'm a sbc guy but I'd go bbc just so I could put a set of these on it.

    upload_2024-7-24_10-57-1.png
     
  24. Sharpone
    Joined: Jul 25, 2022
    Posts: 1,472

    Sharpone
    Member

    What a hell of a conundrum you have, on the one hand you have a Sbc = nostalgia, on the the other hand BBC = power and torque. Hmmmm I’m no help lol
    Dan
     
  25. Budget36
    Joined: Nov 29, 2014
    Posts: 14,448

    Budget36
    Member

    A few years back I was going through Summits site. making note of parts to rebuild a BBC. Man, seems even bearing were 3 times more than a SBC.
    The engine I had gotten for near nothing, but that’s about all that was cost effective;).
     
  26. saltflats
    Joined: Aug 14, 2007
    Posts: 12,881

    saltflats
    Member
    from Missouri

    I'd put a 409 in it. 20160603_205852.jpg
     
  27. I did find a mobile blasting outfit local, he's gonna come by tmrw or Friday and look at the job.
     
  28. No replacement for displacement. BBC is the fun ride ticket.
     
  29. corncobcoupe
    Joined: May 26, 2001
    Posts: 7,952

    corncobcoupe
    SUPER MODERATOR
    Staff Member

    Piss everyone off and put a Cummins in it. :eek:

    Just kidding. :)
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.