Register now to get rid of these ads!

History Bud Shannon and His Model T

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by -Brent-, Jan 20, 2010.

  1. -Brent-
    Joined: Nov 20, 2006
    Posts: 7,843

    -Brent-
    Member

    I was searching for some info on 265 powered T's and I came across this gem.

    The caption below the photo read, "Bud Shannon's '23 Ford T with a '55 Chevy 265 bored to 283, 1964" I'd love to know more about Bud Shannon and his 23 T. Anyone know anything?

    The photo seems to be from a magazine. The Flikr page I got this photo from had all sorts of scans (some very recognizable) from early rod and custom mags.

    [​IMG]
     

    Attached Files:

    Last edited: Jan 20, 2010
  2. butch27
    Joined: Dec 10, 2004
    Posts: 2,846

    butch27
    Member

    That bucket is just perfect.
     
  3. very tidy indeed.
     
  4. thunderbirdesq
    Joined: Feb 15, 2006
    Posts: 7,091

    thunderbirdesq
    Member

  5. -Brent-
    Joined: Nov 20, 2006
    Posts: 7,843

    -Brent-
    Member

    Anyone know the magazine it was from? I'd love to see more about this car.
     
  6. mart3406
    Joined: May 31, 2009
    Posts: 3,055

    mart3406
    Member
    from Canada

    Sweet car! It *almost* looks like it could have been
    the prototype for the old "Big T" and "Little T" scale
    model kits from the same era!

    Mart3406
    ==============================
     
  7. thewishartkid
    Joined: Jun 23, 2006
    Posts: 898

    thewishartkid
    Member

    Great Car! I think the headlights are a bit small!
     
  8. tfeverfred
    Joined: Nov 11, 2006
    Posts: 15,788

    tfeverfred
    Member Emeritus

    Clean and simple. Just what a T should be.
     
  9. -Brent-
    Joined: Nov 20, 2006
    Posts: 7,843

    -Brent-
    Member

    I'd usually agree but I think they look cool and add to the uniqueness of this car.

    I wish I could find more about it. I'd love to build a semi-clone of this car... with front brakes.:D
     
    Last edited: Jan 21, 2010
  10. I was just looking at this car, check out the wishbones.
    [​IMG]
     
  11. -Brent-
    Joined: Nov 20, 2006
    Posts: 7,843

    -Brent-
    Member

    Very cool, thank you! I'd love a photocopy of that, if possible.
     
  12. MeteorMan
    Joined: Dec 5, 2008
    Posts: 373

    MeteorMan
    Member

    Bumping this up for more details...if anyone can add to it.
     
    Last edited: Jun 24, 2010
  13. JeffreyJames
    Joined: Jun 13, 2007
    Posts: 16,626

    JeffreyJames
    Member
    from SUGAR CITY

    Since I originally scanned it I went back and looked at the Text. There's nothing good going on in the HAMB lately so I typed it all out.

    Volkswagon direct acting shocks control front end with dropped '32 axle. No front brakes are used on ultra light streetster. All photos were shot by Bud who is also a photographer who got his roadster to sit for "the Birdie"

    Easy Conversion of '55 Chevy V8 turned a 265 into a 283 with a 1/8" overbore and 11 to 1 Fuel Injection pistons. Duntov cam and lifters are employed and heads are ported to a large dimension, polished, Man-A-Fre manifold is a Four Two type, staggering carbs directly over ports. Stacks help velocity, needed with large Venturi area.

    18" pickup bed built from scratch was fitted to restored body and "T" frame by Haller Top & Body Shop. Headers are 90º bends of conduit, welded and hand filed for invisible seams. Austin-Healey driveshaft turns Ford rear end.

    '23 Wheel on top of Crosley steering. Drilled shift handle activates a '29 or '49 ( couldn't read) Packard gearbox. Gauges are set into stock "T" dash.
     
  14. -Brent-
    Joined: Nov 20, 2006
    Posts: 7,843

    -Brent-
    Member

    JJ, you rule man! I've been thinking the same thing lately and trying to add wherever I can.
     
  15. JeffreyJames
    Joined: Jun 13, 2007
    Posts: 16,626

    JeffreyJames
    Member
    from SUGAR CITY

    I guess since the HAMB is dead lately that should be a good sign to get our ***es off the computer and build some Hot Rods....which you are doing I see so good on you!

    As far as this "T" goes, I have been missing my roadster lately and looking at this one is just even more gut wrenching for me. This thing is awesome and it's short little wheel base makes it a winner right off the bat for me. The fact that it's powered by a motor that is pretty similar to the one I am building one tips the scale for me.

    '56 265 (.125 over) final ci is 283....check!
    Weiand 4x2 Intake with Holly 94's on top.....check!!!
    Duntov 097 Cam....Check!
    Port & polished heads....check!

    I wish I would have got a set of Fuel Injection pistons hahah!!!
     
  16. Royalshifter
    Joined: May 29, 2005
    Posts: 15,977

    Royalshifter
    Moderator
    from California

    Hey JJ great choice mine has a 265 with a Duntov 30 30.
     
  17. need louvers ?
    Joined: Nov 20, 2008
    Posts: 12,901

    need louvers ?
    Member

    I wish I would have seen this thread earlier, I have that issue around here. One thing to note on this car that was pretty common on "T" buckets back then - It's not a roadster body. It's the front half of a '23 - '25 touring. Same with Ivo's car, and Grabowski's. I've always kinda wondered why, with the pattern for these cars being Grabowski's and Ivo's cars, did the first manufacturers of gl*** bodies choose to do roadster bodies? Always struck me as a little weird. This one is one of the better proportioned of the batch from that early sixties era though.
     
  18. JeffreyJames
    Joined: Jun 13, 2007
    Posts: 16,626

    JeffreyJames
    Member
    from SUGAR CITY

    I take notes from the best.....hint hint.;)


    I did hear that about the touring bodies. Never really inspected to see the difference in the two. But if Grawbowski and Ivo did it enough said. That's how it should be done!
     
  19. need louvers ?
    Joined: Nov 20, 2008
    Posts: 12,901

    need louvers ?
    Member

    Take a look at the two lower pictures in the feature, they tell the story. In the one on the left, look at the way the belt line bead splits from the seat back and continues straight back to the bed, and goes straight down from there. That's the front of the rear door jamb. In the picture on the right from the rear three quarters, it's even more pronounced. You can see the square edge running downward. Pull a couple of photos of both Grabowski's and Ivo's and you'll see the same.
     
  20. pasadenahotrod
    Joined: Feb 13, 2007
    Posts: 11,772

    pasadenahotrod
    Member
    from Texas

    Wonder if Bud Shannon is still a San Antonio resident and has that car in his garage?
     
  21. MeteorMan
    Joined: Dec 5, 2008
    Posts: 373

    MeteorMan
    Member


    Your little roadster was damn-near perfect!
    I remember seeing it at the Round Up in '09 and you were talking about selling. Man, if I had the money it would be sitting in my driveway right now!
     
  22. mart3406
    Joined: May 31, 2009
    Posts: 3,055

    mart3406
    Member
    from Canada

    Sorry for reviving an old thread, but anyone who hasn't seen
    this thread previously, just has to see the pics of this car. It
    is absolute shear perfection and looks so, so, "just right!"!!!

    Mart3406
    ===========================================
     
  23. AAFD
    Joined: Apr 13, 2010
    Posts: 585

    AAFD
    Member
    from US of A



    http://www.budshannon.com/
     
  24. Deuces
    Joined: Nov 3, 2009
    Posts: 26,675

    Deuces

    That's the first thing that popped into my head.. :D
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.