Register now to get rid of these ads!

Hot Rods Building my first roadster in Kansas City

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by Tim, May 15, 2025.

  1. Tim
    Joined: Mar 2, 2001
    Posts: 20,070

    Tim
    Member
    from KCMO

    Still on the A. Just trying to keep that ball rolling til I run out of something I need to keep it going.

    I did get the T spring pulled off the A banjo and started eyeballing the 41 rear. I don’t have a work day to spare at the moment to tear the old spring off and swap but I did put the 750-16’s on 35 wires on the rear as the A is getting steelies and some mockup excelsiors for a minute. I think this is really only a good week of picking at it from being a rolling chassis sans drivetrain mounts.

    but I did play with this idea a little today while taking a lunch break. IMG_2584.jpeg Ive been picturing this bottom gauge pod hanging off a dash rail upside down for some time. Twist the gauges back up right and stick my switches in the red surround. I’m sure I’ve mentioned it in this thread already.

    But when I go this second set of gauges and insert from Atch I thought hey wait a minute what if….. Untitled_Artwork.jpeg if I put the two together I get a bevy of instruments, a star on each side and I’m betting that’s getting dang close to model T dash width.

    Don’t know if I’m sold on it but it’s something to chew on.
     
  2. Speedy Canuck
    Joined: Jun 3, 2010
    Posts: 3,896

    Speedy Canuck
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    I've owned a number of 57-60 F100's over the years, so I have a soft spot for this dash. Part of me wants to hate the idea of a stretched dash like you're proposing, but at the same time, I really like the idea. Could end up very cool in a T where it stretches across the full dash width.
    Would you sink/partial recess so that the bottom of the dash and the front top lip of the dash are both flush with the T dash surface? (Not sure if that makes sense), but it would angle the gauges upwards a little more and could give a unique look rather than flush with a top lip overhang.
     
    osage orange and Six Ball like this.
  3. Tim
    Joined: Mar 2, 2001
    Posts: 20,070

    Tim
    Member
    from KCMO

    Yeah I’m pretty back and forth about it. And yeah id have it more or less “flush” and full side to side.

    When looking at it as a stock cab over unit I like it upside down with the over hang /hooded section at the bottom. But looking at the stretched version I think it matches the shape on the cowl top to well to flip over.
     
    Six Ball and pcbart like this.
  4. Six Ball
    Joined: Oct 8, 2007
    Posts: 6,904

    Six Ball
    Member
    from Nevada

    I like the stretched Idea.
     
    osage orange likes this.

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.