Register now to get rid of these ads!

1952-59 Ford Can't keep a good Ford down!

Discussion in 'Off Topic Hot Rods & Customs' started by JeffB2, Dec 10, 2016.

  1. JeffB2
    Joined: Dec 18, 2006
    Posts: 9,669

    JeffB2
    Member
    from Phoenix,AZ

  2. 56FORD390
    Joined: May 11, 2015
    Posts: 770

    56FORD390
    Member

    I wonder if he has kept a service log on his ride? It would be nice to know what had to be done over the 60 years.
     
  3. okiedokie
    Joined: Jul 5, 2005
    Posts: 4,963

    okiedokie
    Member
    from Ok

    Right here in my home town and I didn't see this story. Neat.
     
  4. okiedokie
    Joined: Jul 5, 2005
    Posts: 4,963

    okiedokie
    Member
    from Ok

    Spoke with a friend this morning who worked with this guy for several years. Has had a small block Chevy in it [several] for most of the time he has owned it.
     
  5. DIYGUY
    Joined: Sep 8, 2015
    Posts: 883

    DIYGUY
    Member
    from West, TX

    Oh my gosh, what an unhappy ending!
     
  6. 56longroof
    Joined: Aug 1, 2011
    Posts: 2,379

    56longroof
    Member

    If he'd kept the Ford engine he wouldn't have needed so many small block chevys.
     
    Texas57 and JeffB2 like this.
  7. Texas57
    Joined: Oct 21, 2012
    Posts: 3,742

    Texas57
    Member

    That chevy thing sure put a damper on it.!!
     
  8. okiedokie
    Joined: Jul 5, 2005
    Posts: 4,963

    okiedokie
    Member
    from Ok

  9. JeffB2
    Joined: Dec 18, 2006
    Posts: 9,669

    JeffB2
    Member
    from Phoenix,AZ

    Sure would like to have seen under the hood in the video. You guys with a good ear,did it sound like flathead or a Chevy when he started it ?
     
  10. okiedokie
    Joined: Jul 5, 2005
    Posts: 4,963

    okiedokie
    Member
    from Ok

    It is a Chevy. My friend that worked with Ted for 20 years said he put a 283 from a totaled 58 Chevy in 1968. Had one in it ever since.
     
  11. Rui
    Joined: Sep 17, 2012
    Posts: 1,786

    Rui
    Member

    Ice cold end... But he said it, "It should not be worth much, Its been modified.."
     
  12. Tomdob
    Joined: Feb 5, 2016
    Posts: 60

    Tomdob

    No personal experience with this, but I've heard before that it is easier to install a SBC in '49 - 53 Ford p***enger cars than a SBF. Something to do with the front crossmember IIRC.
     
  13. JeffB2
    Joined: Dec 18, 2006
    Posts: 9,669

    JeffB2
    Member
    from Phoenix,AZ

    Not true,this makes it an EZ swap I've helped several guys on other forums do it. http://www.butchscoolstuff.com/52-53-ford-car-15-sb-ford-engine-transmission-mount-kit-2501cpb/ SBC's also have the rear mounted oil filter too close to the steering box on these Fords so exhaust routing can be a pain with a SBF you can also use Hedman 88400 headers no sweat. You will find pictures of the SBF swap in a '53 Ford on page 4 of the "FAQ Sticky"
     
  14. 56longroof
    Joined: Aug 1, 2011
    Posts: 2,379

    56longroof
    Member

    I personally have never seen any benefit to using anything other than a Ford in a Ford. But I'm a little biased.
     
    buymeamerc likes this.
  15. okiedokie
    Joined: Jul 5, 2005
    Posts: 4,963

    okiedokie
    Member
    from Ok

    Ford in my 53 F100, Ford in my. 55 Sunliner, sbc in both of my 40 Fords. Like em all. In 68 I bet there were a lot more sbc's than sbf's installed in 1953 Fords.
     
  16. cb186
    Joined: Jul 5, 2013
    Posts: 263

    cb186
    Member

    Disappointing to hear it wasn't original, but it certainly didn't sound like a flathead when he started or drove it.
     
  17. Bleach
    Joined: Apr 19, 2011
    Posts: 31,887

    Bleach
    Member

    He would needed fewer Ford engines for sure.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.