Register now to get rid of these ads!

Technical Changing 53 Chevy Track Width on front end?

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by 53CHKustom, Mar 9, 2015.

  1. 53CHKustom
    Joined: Jun 24, 2014
    Posts: 1,433

    53CHKustom
    Member

    Hi All,

    I have a different thread on brakes on a related issue. I have a 53 Chevy with a 57 Chevy rear end and an actual real Mustang II front end suspension (the previous owner got it from a Mustang II in a junk yard).

    Right now it has a ford pinto brake setup 9 inch rotors for Chevy steel wheels. I've been told I should switch to an 11" setup.

    I've seen most GM big brake kits for the MII increase the track width by 1/2 inch per side and I've read others up to 1 inch. ECI makes one that claims to not increase track width at all. Does anyone know if increasing track width by 1" per side would be an issue? I'm not even sure if there would be track width increase over the rotors I have now.

    I have seen some of the firewall/side wall polished by the tire so increasing the track width a little may actually make that go away but i dont know if it would rub on the fender on a turn. I've made it a point to never make a u-turn ever.


    Thanks!

    1.jpg 2.jpg
     
    Last edited: Mar 9, 2015
  2. studebaker46
    Joined: Nov 14, 2007
    Posts: 727

    studebaker46
    Member

    one of the problems with 11 inch rotors on a real mustang front end is the rotors rub the lower a arms when the brakes are applied so you have to relieve the edge of controlarm. now having said all that mine is a 41 ford pu with the 11inch conversion. my brother in law has a 40 ford pu with mustang brakes with 5 lug rotors and itstops just as good as mine with the big conversion.
     
  3. Hnstray
    Joined: Aug 23, 2009
    Posts: 12,357

    Hnstray
    Member
    from Quincy, IL

    The original MMII track width is about 56". Your Chevy is, I believe, closer to 59"/60". Studebaker46 is correct about potential interference with the larger rotors, but it can be safely dealt with.

    Ray
     
  4. 57 HEAP
    Joined: Aug 16, 2006
    Posts: 3,288

    57 HEAP
    Member

    After you correct the rotor/control arm rub, you will need larger wheels to fit over those bigger brakes. So my question is are you driving on a road or a road course? Just having disc brakes and self adjusting rear brakes are WAY better than the old drum brakes alone.
     
  5. 53CHKustom
    Joined: Jun 24, 2014
    Posts: 1,433

    53CHKustom
    Member

    Thanks. What is the best way to relieve the control arm? I am hoping I can upgrade to 11 inch. I'm more or less a novice with metal fab type work.
     
  6. 53CHKustom
    Joined: Jun 24, 2014
    Posts: 1,433

    53CHKustom
    Member

    Thanks. So the stock Chevy steel wheels won't work with 11 inch rotors?

    I am driving on normal roads except steep hills make that car really hard to stop. The current setup is 9" ford pinto disc brakes on that mustang II front end. The rear is a stock 57 chevy with 1" bore wheel cylinders. I measured 5.2 to 1 ratio on the brake pedal ***embly and it has a 70s ford mustang master cylinder with a 1 inch bore I believe (I forgot to measure the bore diameter)

    Right now the pedal goes straight to the floor so I suspect a bad M/C. Since I'm going through all this work I thought of changing to 11" and maybe a different M/C.

    Any advice?
     
    Last edited: Mar 10, 2015
  7. Mr48chev
    Joined: Dec 28, 2007
    Posts: 35,937

    Mr48chev
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    If I remember correctly you will have to take a grinder to the outside lip of the control arm. A couple of licks in the right spot with a BFH might work but that won't help alignment any. I'd play it by ear knowing that I was going to have to rework that outer part of the control arm a bit and work at getting the clearance I felt I needed which isn't an extreme amount. You want it to fit all through the travel of the suspension though.
    As far as wheels, you have 15 inch wheels but I think they are the original wheels and you will probably need a spacer to move them out just enough to clear the calipers. I'd start trying the wheel with no spacer and then use flat washers on the studs to space the rim out maybe 1/4 inch to see if it cleared the caliper. When you figure out what thickness works you can buy "disk brake spacers" at just about any tire store or get them though parts houses.
    If you have pressure on the master cylinder and feel it sink to the floor as you hold it I'd say the master cylinder is byp***ing and needs to be replaced.
     
    Hnstray likes this.
  8. 53CHKustom
    Joined: Jun 24, 2014
    Posts: 1,433

    53CHKustom
    Member

    Thanks so much. It seems the 11" rotors will move the wheels out to begin with and adding a disk brake space may move them out even more. I'm not sure if the wheels would run. The front is lowered with cut springs so the increasing width may be a big issue.
     
  9. studebaker46
    Joined: Nov 14, 2007
    Posts: 727

    studebaker46
    Member

    the easy way to relieve the control arms is with a grinder but if you are just doing normal highway driving change the master cyl and drive it like I said my brotherinlaw has basically same truck as me except more hp and he drives it hard and it stops just as good as mine does with 11inch brakes when ibuilt mine I needed rotor and calipers and it was just as cheap to upgrade to the big brakes as it was to buy new stock calipers and 5hole rotors
     
  10. 53CHKustom
    Joined: Jun 24, 2014
    Posts: 1,433

    53CHKustom
    Member

    Thanks, that will be my starting point. I'm going to get 11" in brake kit and grind the control arm a little. I'll replace the M/C since I suspect it is bad. It has a 67-72 ford mustang M/C with 1" bore. It has the stock 53/54 pedal from what I can tell.
     
  11. Fif-t-3
    Joined: Feb 12, 2007
    Posts: 380

    Fif-t-3
    Member
    from Edmond, Ok

    I did the 11" swap on my '53 with a Mustang II front end. I used Granada rotors with a GM bolt pattern. When I first did the swap I ground the end of the control arm. The end of the arm started to get a little thin and I got nervous so I got another set and reshaped it with heat and a hammer. Even then, I still had a little rub on the rotor. The issue with altering the control arm I had was having to alter the lower ball joint as well. I didn't want to brake down away from home and have to deal with altering and replacing a ball joint on the road. I ended up getting a set of tubular lower control arms from a guy here on the H.A.M.B. with the screw-in ball joints. It completely fixed my clearance issues and I feel more comfortable with the setup.
     
  12. 53CHKustom
    Joined: Jun 24, 2014
    Posts: 1,433

    53CHKustom
    Member

    Thanks, that seems complicated. I wonder if the position of the rotors change will change much? It seems where my 9" rotors sit right now, there wouldn't be an interference if I project out with a straight edge, but I don't know how far in or out 11" rotors would shift.

    I have a real mustang II front end not from a kit so I'm worried on changing any control arms, etc and opening up a can of worms. Hmmm.

    Here are photos showing that my 15" rims should handle the 11" rotors and a view of the control arm/9" rotor

    1.jpg 2.jpg
     
  13. Fif-t-3
    Joined: Feb 12, 2007
    Posts: 380

    Fif-t-3
    Member
    from Edmond, Ok

    heidts-mustang-ii-lower-tubular-control-arms-800x419.jpg control arms.jpg
    I would think that the chrome ones would be a direct bolt in and give you clearance. I have the "a arm" style and had to weld on some gussets.
     
  14. alchemy
    Joined: Sep 27, 2002
    Posts: 22,657

    alchemy
    Member

    I usta have a '39 Chevy that I installed a Mustang II front end in, using the stock MII crossmember. I used dropped spindles from Heidts, and a large disk brake kit that used some Camaro rotors. I don't remember having to grind any on the lower control arm.

    The time it will interfere is when the weight is on the tires, not jacked up like in your photos. You will just need to ***emble the parts, get it off the jackstands, and stick you head underneath while somebody turns the steering wheel back and forth. All this guessing won't give you a solid answer.
     
  15. atomickustom
    Joined: Aug 30, 2005
    Posts: 3,407

    atomickustom
    Member

    The extra inch or so spacing per side will actually work quite well. And it will get the inside of your wheel away from the control arm.
    I have an actual mkII Front suspension on my 53 Chevy, and I originally put it together with wheels that had extra front spacing to get the track width of the '53 Chevy track width. Looked good, drove fine.
     
  16. 53CHKustom
    Joined: Jun 24, 2014
    Posts: 1,433

    53CHKustom
    Member

    Thanks. I will just buy an 11" kit and see how it all fits together and then look at what needs to be ground out.
     
  17. 53CHKustom
    Joined: Jun 24, 2014
    Posts: 1,433

    53CHKustom
    Member

    I finally got to this. I bought the Speedway 11" Disc brake kit. I noticed the wheel moved out by 3/4" to 1" I did just a quick configuration check but have not greased bearings, bled brakes etc..

    I have 2" dropped spindles and it looks like my turning ability hasn't reduced a whole lot from before but it's hard to tell. The photos show the max I can turn the wheel. I hope it's enough for a right hand turn at a light. I'm moving from my house next Sunday and will be in a 1 car garage so I'm hoping I get lucky and I don't have huge surprises if I install the kit and drive it on Saturday or I'll be screwed.

    I noticed the 11" GM rotor clears the control arm so I shouldn't need to grind it (The 11" granada one was closer from what I remember than the Chevelle ones in the photos below). It's hard to tell from the photos but I measured at least 3/8" gap between the control arm lip and rotor during the entire wheel position when turning and also with the car on the ground and on jackstands. The caliper is the GM intermediate which is bigger than GM metrics and does not rub on the rim and it clears the stock Mustang II strut bar.

    I'm encouraged enough to give this a go. Does anyone see anything obvious I'm not taking into consideration? The other 11" disc brake kit I bought had GM metrics and Granada rotors but I decided to install this one. It should be a big improvement over the stock pinto brakes. I also installed a new 68-72 Mustang Master Cylinder with 1" bore.

    da11.JPG IMG_1344.JPG IMG_1337.JPG IMG_1345.JPG
     
    Last edited: Jul 15, 2015
  18. 53CHKustom
    Joined: Jun 24, 2014
    Posts: 1,433

    53CHKustom
    Member

    Corrected above to say Chevelle rotors not Camaro rotors.
     
  19. bobss396
    Joined: Aug 27, 2008
    Posts: 18,732

    bobss396
    Member

    It looks like it might be fine... only one way to find out.. keep going.
     
  20. 53CHKustom
    Joined: Jun 24, 2014
    Posts: 1,433

    53CHKustom
    Member

    Thanks. Haha yep on a scary tight deadline. I will hopefully bolt/install all of it on Saturday and drive it (fingers crossed it doesn't rain here as predicted). If it doesn't work out I have Sunday to put the old set up back together and drive it down to San Diego where it's staying in a 1 car garage. No big projects on this for a few months until I find a better place to work on it.
     
  21. bobss396
    Joined: Aug 27, 2008
    Posts: 18,732

    bobss396
    Member

    You should be okay, just take slower and wider turns if you have to.
     
    53CHKustom likes this.
  22. 53CHKustom
    Joined: Jun 24, 2014
    Posts: 1,433

    53CHKustom
    Member

    Thanks its a worthwhile trade-off for better stopping ability, especially downhill.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.