Register now to get rid of these ads!

chevy 348

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by 5559, Jun 28, 2013.

  1. 5559
    Joined: Oct 25, 2012
    Posts: 362

    5559
    Member
    from tn

    I've got a chance to buy a 2 or 2 1/2 ton 65 chev truck which is said to have a 348 in it . I dont know if it is or if it's a 409 or even if its orignial to this truck.Do the w engines have a different block for the big trucks (like the 366 - 427) on later models or will they interchange with car engines. basically what do i need to look for & will this eng be a bolt in for a 59 el camino.
     
  2. Johnny Gee
    Joined: Dec 3, 2009
    Posts: 15,002

    Johnny Gee
    Member
    from Downey, Ca

    My Tall Block knowledge is zero. However, a 348 has it's dipstick on the driver side and 409 has it on the p***enger side of the engine.
     
  3. 56don
    Joined: Dec 11, 2005
    Posts: 10,379

    56don
    Member

    I got mine out of a large truck. The blocks are made the same as a car engine but you have to change the water pump and distributor to a car design.
    Some of the big trucks had two reliefs cut into the cylinders in the block. Mine just had one so some of the trucks blocks are better than others.
    The truck heads if they are 333 castings will have a slight combustion chamber in them which lowers compression.
    You can't go by the dipstick position. A truck 348 will have the dipstick on the same side as a p***enger car 409. Some truck oil pans are different from the p***enger car also with more volume.
     
  4. Johnny Gee
    Joined: Dec 3, 2009
    Posts: 15,002

    Johnny Gee
    Member
    from Downey, Ca

    Cool, more use full info.
     
  5. bobwop
    Joined: Jan 13, 2008
    Posts: 6,164

    bobwop
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from Arley, AL

  6. Atwater Mike
    Joined: May 31, 2002
    Posts: 11,618

    Atwater Mike
    Member

    I had a '63 Impala 409, 2X4 intake, E series AFBs, Jardine headers, General Kinetics cam, Schieffer alum flywheel.
    I lost a con rod at Fremont drags, and a bud wanted to 'try out' my intake on his 348.

    One of the Chev gurus said the width was different between the heads, manifolds NOT interchangeable.
    Somebody here verify that? (distributors interchanged, as I recall...)
     
  7. 56don
    Joined: Dec 11, 2005
    Posts: 10,379

    56don
    Member

    The intake ports on a 409 hipo are a lot taller than a 348. You could probably make it fit but one of the bolt holes wouldn't line up. I have heard of people doing that but it doesn't really fit.
     
  8. Larry T
    Joined: Nov 24, 2004
    Posts: 7,921

    Larry T
    Member

    The 348 and the 409 are the same deck height. As was said you can bolt a manifold for a high performance 409 onto a 348 with standard heads, but................... You have to fill the 4 bolt holes at the top of the ports and eliminate the bolt. That's not really a big deal. There is a pretty major port mismatch though. Kinda like bolting an intake for a rectangular port big block on an engine with oval port heads.
    You can port match the heads for the taller intake but the roof of the ports get real thin.
     

    Attached Files:

    Last edited: Jun 28, 2013
  9. cavman
    Joined: Mar 23, 2005
    Posts: 704

    cavman
    Member

    The crankshaft flywheel flange on a 409 is bell shaped, the 348 is round, other than the fabled "X" on the front of the block, which some 348's even have, is the only sure way I know of to say which one it is. There is no difference in deck height, and all truck blocks have a notch in the cyl bore, and truck blocks have one less hole tapped in the front of the block.(lower driver side frt) And yes, it will bolt into an early 'camino.
     
  10. nicely said
     
  11. chickenridgerods
    Joined: Jul 22, 2003
    Posts: 1,576

    chickenridgerods
    Member
    from DSM, IA

    The only "sure way" is to check the casting number on the back of the block behind the drivers side head deck. That will also tell you if is a p***enger car block or a truck block, ***uming it's not a replacement.

    The crank flange is probably the 2nd best way, since it's unlikely a 348 would have a 409 crank in it unless the engine is from a hot rod of some sort.

    Dipstick location, intake manifold, heads, and "X" on the front won't tell you squat.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.