Register now to get rid of these ads!

Chopped the Top...Does it Look Right?

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by Shoeboxer, Jun 14, 2004.

  1. Shoeboxer
    Joined: May 1, 2004
    Posts: 306

    Shoeboxer
    Member

    So I 'chopped (photochopped) the roof on my '49 Ford model over the weekend. Does it look right? I'm genuinely not sure. I brought the front and back out to meet the lower parts, basically stretching the roof. What do you guys think?

    [​IMG]

    -Taylor
     
  2. Missing Link
    Joined: Sep 9, 2002
    Posts: 865

    Missing Link
    Member

    the rear pillars need to be layed down on a harder angle towards the "B" pillars to give a more streamlined look. It would give the rear window more of sloped, almost fast back sort of look. It looks a bit too "Checker Cab-ish" the way it sits now, imo.
     
  3. michaelthe9
    Joined: Jun 9, 2004
    Posts: 261

    michaelthe9
    Member

    Shoeboxer,
    I think that you are heading down the wrong path somewhat. You might want to try another one this time putting a slight angle on the major portion of the roof and a nice gradual slope from the B piller to the sail panels. Lay the back window down toward the front and get you some teardrop styling in the quarter windows. I don't think that you want to add sections to the roof because that makes it look like a table top. Since it is a plastic model you might want to slant the B pillars forward too. The main thing that I would look for in a chop profile is the smooth slope toward the rear and a nice blend into the deck area.

    Just my $0.02.

    Keep at it bud,
    Michael
     
  4. Shoeboxer
    Joined: May 1, 2004
    Posts: 306

    Shoeboxer
    Member

    Thanks guys...the nice part is that this is all being done in photoshop, so I can fiddle with it later today and see what happens.

    -Taylor
     
  5. Unkl Ian
    Joined: Mar 29, 2001
    Posts: 13,509

    Unkl Ian

    By making the roof longer,you risk creating a flat spot.
     

    Attached Files:

  6. Shoeboxer
    Joined: May 1, 2004
    Posts: 306

    Shoeboxer
    Member

    I see. <nods> Yeah, now that I'm home from some errands, let me play with it and see what I come up with.

    -Taylor
     
  7. michaelthe9
    Joined: Jun 9, 2004
    Posts: 261

    michaelthe9
    Member

    There we go. That's what I'm talkin'about! Nice slope to the deck area and slanted B posts.
    Lets go for a putt.
    Michael
     
  8. Shoeboxer
    Joined: May 1, 2004
    Posts: 306

    Shoeboxer
    Member

    Well, here's the result after about 30 minutes in Photoshop.

    [​IMG]

    -Taylor
     
  9. Fraz
    Joined: Mar 3, 2001
    Posts: 1,818

    Fraz
    Member
    from Dixon, MO

    Better. First pic looks like you chopped it backwards, more in the front than the back.
     
  10. Shoeboxer
    Joined: May 1, 2004
    Posts: 306

    Shoeboxer
    Member

    Well, in the first pic I pulled the front forward and the back rearward, filling in the middle. I've since learned my lesson. [​IMG]

    -Taylor
     
  11. Missing Link
    Joined: Sep 9, 2002
    Posts: 865

    Missing Link
    Member

    I think I still have an article that ran a few years back in Scale Auto Enthusiast magazine that went through step by step on how to chop a shoebox. If you want to check it out I can look for it and scan it and e-mail it to you.
     
  12. Shoeboxer
    Joined: May 1, 2004
    Posts: 306

    Shoeboxer
    Member

    That would be awesome! Don't know that I have the bravery to attempt it, but it'd be a good resource to have if I ever change my mind. [​IMG]

    -Taylor
     
  13. How about this one Taylor?

    [​IMG]

     
  14. Shoeboxer
    Joined: May 1, 2004
    Posts: 306

    Shoeboxer
    Member

    Eeek, gawd no...the coupes just don't look right. I like my Shoeboxes full size!

    -Taylor (who will be there this Thursday)
     
  15. [ QUOTE ]
    -Taylor (who will be there this Thursday)

    [/ QUOTE ]

    Look forward to it!

    This any better??

     
  16. Shoeboxer
    Joined: May 1, 2004
    Posts: 306

    Shoeboxer
    Member

    Much better, thanks!

    -Taylor
     
  17. Glad that I could help.....

    [​IMG]

     
  18. Flexicoker
    Joined: Apr 17, 2004
    Posts: 1,416

    Flexicoker
    Member

    Dang man, you really got bit hard by the shoebox bug
     
  19. slammed
    Joined: Jun 10, 2004
    Posts: 8,150

    slammed
    Member

    That look's great. It seem's as though it's in motion. This is the look it need's.The dark color add's to the lower,meaner,leaner look.Wonder how it would look if the nose came down 2"? Forward look is the winner here.Good work.
     
  20. Shoeboxer
    Joined: May 1, 2004
    Posts: 306

    Shoeboxer
    Member

    [ QUOTE ]
    Dang man, you really got bit hard by the shoebox bug

    [/ QUOTE ]

    Yeah, and that Cortizone-10 stuff, just ain't helping!

    -Taylor
     
  21. Flexicoker
    Joined: Apr 17, 2004
    Posts: 1,416

    Flexicoker
    Member

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.