Register now to get rid of these ads!

Technical Console Shifter or ?????? for 64 Chevy.....Anyone up on the differences

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by hellerlj, Oct 22, 2017.

  1. hellerlj
    Joined: Oct 12, 2005
    Posts: 1,228

    hellerlj
    Member
    from Minnesota

    I am selling a Saginaw 4spd, that came out of a 1964 Chevy Impala
    It is the one with ****** and shifter in photo
    I have a guy looking at it, and wants to know if it is for a "CONSOLE"
    He bought one already, that he was told WAS for a Console and it doesn't seem to fit
    It is the one picutured sticking out of the floor
    Can anyone tell me, by just these two photos, what is going on or ??????
    Any and All help will be much appreciated
    You can answer me directly if you like HELLERLJ@comcast.net
     

    Attached Files:

    chryslerfan55 likes this.
  2. Moriarity
    Joined: Apr 11, 2001
    Posts: 37,704

    Moriarity
    SUPER MODERATOR
    Staff Member

    a 64 Impala would have come from the factory with a T10. 4 speed .. Saginaws are much later. Hard to say if a factory console would work
     
  3. uncleandy 65
    Joined: Jan 14, 2013
    Posts: 4,284

    uncleandy 65
    Member

    The one on the left has the original console shifter but the trans should be a Borg Warner not a Saginaw. The other one could be a 65 shifter.
     
  4. vinfab
    Joined: Apr 18, 2006
    Posts: 336

    vinfab
    Member

    I am not sure what car your trans and shifter came out of, but it was not a 64 Chevrolet. According to Chevrolet records, the first Muncie transmissions were shipped from the plant on 2/6/63 for installation in cars in the May/ June ***embly time frame. All 64's with 4 speeds (full size. Corvette, and Chevelle) came with Muncies. The first 4 speed Saginaws, other than Corvairs did not appear until the '66 model year.
     
    Last edited: Oct 22, 2017
  5. primed34
    Joined: Feb 3, 2007
    Posts: 1,560

    primed34
    Member

    One on the right looks like it was made for a bench seat. Had one like on the Muncie in my '55 at one time.
     
  6. Black Panther
    Joined: Jan 6, 2010
    Posts: 2,376

    Black Panther
    Member
    from SoCal

    Pretty sure GM only made one style of these shifters. In other words...the shifter body is the same as it bolts directly to the transmission...the only variable is the shifter handle which unbolts. Shorter ones like the one in the first picture shown are console type...they also made taller bench seat ones with a more pronounced bend in them..like the second picture. I believe theyd all work in a console...some just wont look right. The 4 speed consoles back then had the hole for the shifter offset to the left....makes for a pretty simple shifter...and a more complicated looking console. Ive never seen one of those shifters on a Saginaw either...but since Saginaw shifters bolt on the same as T10s and Muncies....somebody probably modified a non reverse rod to reach the reverse shifter lever area on a Saginaw...
     
  7. Mr48chev
    Joined: Dec 28, 2007
    Posts: 36,036

    Mr48chev
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    chevrolet_impala_ss_409_convertible_9.jpg 64 ss 4 speed.jpg
    According to these two snagged off the net photos that straight shift handle should be the right one but someone would have to come say if there is a distance from the front of the trans difference in shifter locations between the different transmissions.
     
  8. Black Panther
    Joined: Jan 6, 2010
    Posts: 2,376

    Black Panther
    Member
    from SoCal

    I believe the overall length of the Saginaw, T10 and Muncie trans are the same...and the shifters bolt in the same place. Only difference would be rod length for the Saginaw and levers....pre 1969 Muncie and T10 are the same for the lever thay bolts to side of the trans which does the actual internal shifting..
     
  9. hellerlj
    Joined: Oct 12, 2005
    Posts: 1,228

    hellerlj
    Member
    from Minnesota

    Thanks for your input
     
  10. hellerlj
    Joined: Oct 12, 2005
    Posts: 1,228

    hellerlj
    Member
    from Minnesota

    THANKS for your input
     
  11. hellerlj
    Joined: Oct 12, 2005
    Posts: 1,228

    hellerlj
    Member
    from Minnesota

    Thanks for your input....
     
  12. hellerlj
    Joined: Oct 12, 2005
    Posts: 1,228

    hellerlj
    Member
    from Minnesota

    Thanks for your input
     
  13. hellerlj
    Joined: Oct 12, 2005
    Posts: 1,228

    hellerlj
    Member
    from Minnesota

    Thanks VERY MUCH for your detailed answer....very helpful
     
  14. hellerlj
    Joined: Oct 12, 2005
    Posts: 1,228

    hellerlj
    Member
    from Minnesota

    THANKS for your input.....
     
  15. 327Eric
    Joined: May 9, 2008
    Posts: 2,203

    327Eric
    Member

    Be safe and tell him you do not know the application. It is a ****shoot as to whether it is correct or not. Present the info you have just been given and let him decide whether to buy or not.
     
  16. hendelec
    Joined: Aug 23, 2008
    Posts: 100

    hendelec
    Member

    I had a 1965 Chevelle SS with a console that had the straight shifter with the "T" for reverse lock out & chrome shift ball..................
     
  17. hellerlj
    Joined: Oct 12, 2005
    Posts: 1,228

    hellerlj
    Member
    from Minnesota

    VERY GOOD ADVICE.....I sort of did that exact thing, after all the folks chimed in here....THANKS
     
  18. cavman
    Joined: Mar 23, 2005
    Posts: 698

    cavman
    Member

    This is a factory '64 W/console shifter. Notice the handle is offset to the right.


    upload_2017-10-22_22-49-42.jpeg
     
  19. DDDenny
    Joined: Feb 6, 2015
    Posts: 22,542

    DDDenny
    Member
    from oregon

    I guess it can't hurt having more photos that the OP can't use.
    This is pretty much as you described Black Panther, this is the 66-67 Nova shifter for the Muncie 4 speed with console, about the hardest to find out of all the GM shifters.
    Not only is it offset and requires a console with quite an extension towards the drivers leg but also requires the tailhousing with the farthest forward mounting holes.
    Note the reverse rod, the shortest of all GM rods.
    Also note the shift boot/trim ring, the 65-67 Nova and 64 Impala used the same ones.

    20160708_102456.jpg 20160708_103538.jpg
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.