Register now to get rid of these ads!

Dodge guys I need help

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by J.D., Dec 7, 2004.

  1. J.D.
    Joined: Oct 1, 2004
    Posts: 799

    J.D.
    Member
    from Clovis, CA

    My buddy just bought a '49 Dodge Wayfar Convertable, he wants to put it on a early frame under it(the susp. on the '49 is almost all missing) but not sure what to get. I was looking at mid 70's cars but most seem to be unibody. The wheel base needs to be around 115 to 117 inches, not sure on front suspension width. Anyone have any suggestions
    oh ya he wants to keep it Dodge

    Thanks for the help [​IMG]
     
  2. Well, He's prety much SOL unless he wants a truck frame.
    Dodge went Unibody in the very early sixties.
    I don't know if the full size (Read that Newport) cars had full frames or not.
    He could always use a Chevy or Ford frame and transplant a Dodge powertrain.
     
  3. Why not keep the original frame thats on it and add a Diplomat or Volare K-member and front suspension, and add a 60/70 B-body 8 3/4 rear end?
     
  4. Yeah...what he said.
     
  5. J.D.
    Joined: Oct 1, 2004
    Posts: 799

    J.D.
    Member
    from Clovis, CA

    I agree with you Hellfish but it's not my car. Thanks for the help I will keep looking and keep trying to talk him into keeping the stock frame
     
  6. Dodge truck frame from mid 1980's is 115". That might work... He can put in a big-block with Schumacher mounts, bada-bing!
     
  7. wayfarer
    Joined: Oct 17, 2003
    Posts: 1,789

    wayfarer
    Member

    My '49 wayfarer has a fatman mustang II stub on it and a 9" on the original leafs. Pretty straightforward combination, if he wants it to be reliable and easy to do. As for a chassis, I know when we were planning the build on the dodge, a '73 chevelle wagon frame had the right wheelbase and track width for the car, of course then it's not all dodge. If you have any questions on how mine went together, don't hesitate to ask.
     
  8. J.D.
    Joined: Oct 1, 2004
    Posts: 799

    J.D.
    Member
    from Clovis, CA

    thanks for the imput, it helps a lot
     
  9. The Imperial was frame on chassis at least through '63, possibly through 67.
     
  10. Brickster
    Joined: Nov 23, 2003
    Posts: 1,130

    Brickster
    Member

    The volare sub frame is a nice unit but is too wide for that car. A mustang II is better suited for it as far as the width goes.
     
  11. I've got a front subframe from a Chrysler 5th Ave. that I was going to use in my '56 Plymouth. The width was right on for the '56. It's complete with brakes, etc., and I have the Schumacher kit to big-block it, brand new. I'm in Southern Co, in the San Luis Valley. Let me know if this will help.
     
  12. 4gotn1
    Joined: Dec 16, 2002
    Posts: 76

    4gotn1
    Member

    K frame wise you would get closer with a volare(F body). The diplomat/5th Ave (M body) is a little wider. However a dakota frame is really close to the stock frame that is under it except for the rear rails. I haven't got the actual dimensions but they are kind of close.
     
  13. J.D.
    Joined: Oct 1, 2004
    Posts: 799

    J.D.
    Member
    from Clovis, CA

    what about susp. wouldn't a truck be a little to much for what I need?
     
  14. Bigcheese327
    Joined: Sep 16, 2001
    Posts: 6,734

    Bigcheese327
    Member

    You can adjust spring rates and whatnot. It's probably not going to ride a lot worse than the original 1949 setup (maybe better if you set it up right), plus you won't have the huge parts availability problems someone working with a stock chassis would.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.