Register now to get rid of these ads!

Dual Holley snipers on a flathead?

Discussion in 'Off Topic Hot Rods & Customs' started by ActionYobbo, Nov 3, 2025.

  1. ActionYobbo
    Joined: Mar 28, 2022
    Posts: 346

    ActionYobbo
    Member

    At home sick today so I been thinking what if I was to get an intake manifold that fed both sides of the motor individually. Then set up two EFI 1100’s as two separate systems each responsible for one side of the motor. What problems would that cause?
     
    chryslerfan55 likes this.
  2. Moriarity
    Joined: Apr 11, 2001
    Posts: 37,205

    Moriarity
    SUPER MODERATOR
    Staff Member

    moved to the off topic forum
     
    mad mikey and chryslerfan55 like this.
  3. RodStRace
    Joined: Dec 7, 2007
    Posts: 8,598

    RodStRace
    Member

    It's a fever, right?
    This is a fever dream and once it breaks you will no longer babble incoherently, right? :D

    1. Cost
    2. Time and money for little benefit.
    3. When you say one for each side, you realize the firing order, which is preceded by the inlet stroke is not even side-to-side.
    https://www.jalopyjournal.com/forum/threads/flathead-firing-order.488465/
    I am not well versed with flathead intake theory, but I'd go with the front/back locations used thru most of it's life.
    4. If you want to look at combining the latest tech on an engine that was designed almost one hundred years ago, look at LSR racing and the engines built for that. Then add in cold start and warmup, idle and part throttle operation, and fuel economy.
    5. Does Holley provide a way to sync two separate systems? If not, realize what a feedback loop is aside from just a cool guitar sound.
    EDIT: https://forums.holley.com/forum/holley-efi/sniper-efi/8365-dual-sniper

    That said, you might be one of those people that thrive on proving It Can't Be Done is wrong.
    All the pioneers cut and tried, and some of it worked great. I figure you were bored and wondering, so that's the stuff off the top of my head why not.
     
    Last edited: Nov 3, 2025
    JohnLewis likes this.
  4. oldiron 440
    Joined: Dec 12, 2018
    Posts: 3,973

    oldiron 440
    Member

    I’m sure you can get more control of your fuel curve on that flathead than it’s ever had before… manifold selection might be more important because you can tune fuel to perfection. I say go for it!

    startup and drivability will be much improved once you get it right.
     
  5. Bandit Billy
    Joined: Sep 16, 2014
    Posts: 15,821

    Bandit Billy
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    That's $2200 just for the EFI 1 barrels not including manifolds and no guarantee it would work. If you got the dough, I'm in for the show!
     
  6. ActionYobbo
    Joined: Mar 28, 2022
    Posts: 346

    ActionYobbo
    Member

    What started this line of thought was a video of an engine running with 1 head removed. So that got me thinking that an o2 sensor and carburetor for each side instead of the old way of front half and back half. Then the question did anyone ever make a left half right half dual carburetor manifold?
     

    Attached Files:

    Bandit Billy likes this.
  7. I have exp. with snipers. The amount of throttle body area at wide open throttle will be overwhelming. Even one would require some modification to the linkage that opens the 2nd set of barrels. If you wanted to get creative, you could build a throttle stop to control opening to match the velocity of the engine at upper rpm ranges. By not opening the throttle much at low rpm, decent results could be achieved.
     
  8. mustangsix
    Joined: Mar 7, 2005
    Posts: 1,535

    mustangsix
    Member

    He was talking about using the 1bbl sniper. It could be made to work but the cost/benefit*****ysis would be tough.
     
  9. Oops. I went to sleep, again. :)
     
  10. 19Eddy30
    Joined: Mar 27, 2011
    Posts: 3,834

    19Eddy30
    Member
    from VA

    How deep your pockets ?
    I can spend your $$$$!
    Let's get Creative.
    8 ecu's , or One custom ,
    A good writer to configure a program,
    8 throttle Body's
    8 coil packs ect, custom Reluctor wheel.
    Tune each cylinder as 1 individually ,
    But 2 cylinders share same exhaust port
    Per side , so there a balance that would have to experiment with, exhaust side.

    Maybe use a 2 in 1 coil set up to have
    Just 4 coils .. Ect
    May be see the thinking ...

    The 2 ecu & 2 TBI's would work,
    Then You would Need 2 distributors
    Or another way to run engine like
    4 cylinder , Or
    Custom way to trigger coil's 2 , Reluctor wheel , 2 Distributor . Yad Yada .

    Then if you loose one side Kind of dead in water On one side
    If you loose a sensor , witch would be multiple duplicates ,, No mater witch way You Go , 2 TPI's or 4 , 8 .
    There way's to do all this , $$$$$
    Development research,,

    Maybe Just Focus On
    Custom Equal Length Intake Runner's With Custom
    TBI that Looks like twin Carbs
    Or Single With regular Snipe/Fuel Tec Ecu
    Picture below is just an example for
    "" 1 ""coil F -H


    IMG_4337.png
     
    Last edited: Nov 4, 2025
  11. ActionYobbo
    Joined: Mar 28, 2022
    Posts: 346

    ActionYobbo
    Member

    I have seen a flathead with 2 distributors, 2 coils and 16 spark plugs running mechanical port injection
     
  12. 19Eddy30
    Joined: Mar 27, 2011
    Posts: 3,834

    19Eddy30
    Member
    from VA

    Yes MFI , No big Deal easy !
    One throttle body or 2 - 8 ,
    & 8 port Nozzles.
    One or Two distributors,
    Been done I think Pre War or just after off top of head time frame.

    Your wanting " EFI "
    Totally different way
     
    Last edited: Nov 4, 2025
  13. Bandit Billy
    Joined: Sep 16, 2014
    Posts: 15,821

    Bandit Billy
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    The following is a paragraph that accompanied this photograph that I found on the net. These are not my words;

    Most unusual is this prewar high-rise Davies 2x2. I've seen photos of a Davies in use in 1940 on a Flathead-powered '29 Model A. Bill Ewing ran one on his deuce roadster for a time. The tall risers are set up for Winfield carburetors, but you could purchase adapters for the ubiquitous Stromberg 97s or 48s.
    [​IMG]

    I saw this online when I did a search for "cross ram flathead intake". It would be cool to build a cross ram for your idea. This one has an equalizer tube but that could be chopped out or plated actually. This may be the rarest flathead intake on the planet for all I know but it may give you ideas.
     
    19Eddy30 likes this.
  14. 19Eddy30
    Joined: Mar 27, 2011
    Posts: 3,834

    19Eddy30
    Member
    from VA

    @Bandit Billy
    I seen pics of that intake years ago ,
    I would think better flowing
    Then Sling shot , because pretty much equal length runners across all eight cylinders.
    The only thing maybe would be imbalance if the Two carbs did not flow
    Feed identical from Idle to cruise ,wot

    A design like that with one single carburetor in the middle would be excellent, & maybe shorter or Taller
     
  15. ActionYobbo
    Joined: Mar 28, 2022
    Posts: 346

    ActionYobbo
    Member

    That Davies manifold is like what I was thinking (without the crossover) and with EFI managing each side there would be no imbalance. I might be able to cobble something together like that.
     
  16. RodStRace
    Joined: Dec 7, 2007
    Posts: 8,598

    RodStRace
    Member

  17. Bandit Billy
    Joined: Sep 16, 2014
    Posts: 15,821

    Bandit Billy
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

  18. 19Eddy30
    Joined: Mar 27, 2011
    Posts: 3,834

    19Eddy30
    Member
    from VA

    If you use the Davies intake
    Run one sniper as main the other piggyback the 2nd with just injector
    & make a drive shaft to connect throttle shafts in stead of bell linkage or use Bell.
    Adjust & lower fuel psi on laptop support & change duty cycle on injectors & tuning ,
    Not done threw hand held keeping Around 70 % with 35-40 psi fuel pressure , & one O2 , One TPS ,
    And with thought u can also clean up looks move the TPS to gas pedal on inside ,
    You can also take apart And eliminate wires on big bulky plugs many wires most time will not be used , Void's warranty ,
    But only has a One year anyways from purchase date
    Also if wanting to Hide / clean up & relocate Map , IAC , TPs ..

    Also the term self learning Is a
    ""Vague term"" just to get up running
    & a start to help get a base ,,
    Then lap top is needed to actually tune
    To full potential ..

    I have one of the 4500 with 8 injectors
    Good for around 1,400 hp
    I have a few engine that rang from
    500 hp to 1,300 hp
    So depends on Hp , the low Hp engine I had to recalibrate adjust on laptop down to 40 psi & duty cycle of injectors to 70%
    Originally fuel pressure was set @65 psi
    & duty on Injectors where around 30%
    & Was way to much fuel .

    So On a F -H with 100 -150 hp
    Will be same as in Lowering fuel psi from 55-60 psi to 30 ish something then to adjust to keep the duty cycle over 60% With
    2 TPI 's body's .

    One Sniper 1,100 supports up to
    170 -200 hp
     
    Last edited: Nov 5, 2025 at 9:59 PM
    ekimneirbo likes this.
  19. I am not conversant with a Ford engine. Having said that, I know a man that has two EFI mounted on a 1941 Buick duel carburetor manifold. Probably not what you envision.

    Ben
     
  20. Dave G in Gansevoort
    Joined: Mar 28, 2019
    Posts: 3,705

    Dave G in Gansevoort
    Member
    from Upstate NY

    A friend who unfortunately is not on the hamb, has done efi on a flathead for the street, using a Hilborn stack injection manifold and Holley electronic components to operate it. It starts like a new car, pulls strong to the redline, idles around 850 rpm, and gets great mileage. Oh, and it breaks Ford 3 speeds easily!

    Now for the bad news. It was not inexpensive and took a lot of effort to get it right. Plus a lot of special fabrication for a lot of things we don’t need with a carburetor.
     
  21. 19Eddy30
    Joined: Mar 27, 2011
    Posts: 3,834

    19Eddy30
    Member
    from VA

    Most if Not Just a bolt on & $1,200
    Cheap some say Expensive.

    But I can say that the Unit You describe
    Starting With Key part Hillborn ,
    & may be ECU Custom parts fabrication add it All up especially if you doing the work yourself
    $3,000 to 4k ish
    Vs
    Not being able to do $5,500 Up
    No parts starting off ,
    Hilborn Bare with just*****erflies
    $700-1,200
    Ecu $700- 3,500
    Then the rest needed
    Plus custom work / parts
    Then Labor this why $5,500 up..

    If familiar there's even a cheaper way to do using OBD One First GEN Fuel Injection ECU & some Early OB2 and thinking outside of the box,

    Down side of OBD 1 in Hot Rod
    Limited to be able to adjust but you can add a super chip Or take Cheep Holley Sinper Remove ECU & adapt to pretty much anything you want .
    Snippers start @ $ 1,100 ish up
     
    Last edited: Nov 6, 2025 at 8:17 PM
  22. RodStRace
    Joined: Dec 7, 2007
    Posts: 8,598

    RodStRace
    Member

    Good info, Eddy.
    I wouldn't mind an EFI setup, but cost of entry, steep learning curve and obsolescent by the time you turn the key.
    Just like so many things, there used to be a fairly standard***X sensor at a reasonable price but the makers keep reinventing the wheel so who knows if that part you built into your system will be around when it fails later.
     
    firstinsteele likes this.
  23. 19Eddy30
    Joined: Mar 27, 2011
    Posts: 3,834

    19Eddy30
    Member
    from VA

    Unfortunately Now a day's most of us old stuff when brake down & need of right then and there ,Most parts needs to be ordered even from the Big box stores,
    Most of parts on Holley is Ls components and sensors.
    I do miss the days up until Early 2000 parts on shelf NAPA , That made Long road trips doable, Now pretty much have to stay in Hotel for at least one night until they get the part the next day
     
    RodStRace likes this.
  24. I have mentioned this , directly and indirectly. I have a re purposed 1990 GM Throttle Body on my 1950 Buick inline eight. Been from NO Texas to Seattle and back. Iowa and back. Many shorter 1000 mile or less round trips. Total of almost 30,000 miles. I have yet to have a break down . Period. Only problems have been from other systems. All sensors available .
    Oh, there is a problem with it! I never have anything to do but look at it.:D

    Ben
     
    ekimneirbo, SS327 and TrailerTrashToo like this.
  25. 19Eddy30
    Joined: Mar 27, 2011
    Posts: 3,834

    19Eddy30
    Member
    from VA

    @firstinsteele
    Yes OBD 1 pretty reliable even TunePort
    I have 6 Gm sb & Bb out of those
    Only one lost One injector on TPI 94
    With around 160k miles,
    Another 90 454 with 34k miles Distributor pick up,
    Another with 81k
    Another 260k
    Another 190 k 93
    Pic below around 91 a TunePort pulled off 87 IROC installed on 450 hp sb
    & put around 60k on 25 mpg , Pic shows stetting in Snow No Hood , was reliable.
    Then Ford OBD1 2.3 200k
    86 3.8 stang 190 k
    IMG_4355.png
     
    RodStRace likes this.
  26. Mike Lawless
    Joined: Sep 20, 2021
    Posts: 718

    Mike Lawless

    I too have a GM LS single throttle body with port injectors on a 300 inch inline six. Holley Terminator, which also controls ignition timing. Solid and reliable.
    Before that, I had the Sniper 1100 on it. Nice little unit, all self contained. It has a single 100lb/hr injector.
    Knowing what I know about 'em, I'd reckon you'd have to treat 'em as two separate units, tuning each individually, with each having its own O2 sensor, and treating as two four cylinders. The "brain" is integrated into the throttle body. So the question is, is there a way for one to control the other? I dunno.
    Treating them as two four cylinder unit, potential problems would be synching. Not so much the injector flow, since it's a single injector and "pretty much" constant flow. There's no timing issue unless you wanted to control timing using the Sniper's built in controls.
    Two coolant temp sensors? Two idle air control valves? Or disable one?
    It would be interesting, for certain!
    There was a guy on YouTube that used throttle bodies from a motorcycle on a flathead, 3D printed his prototype adapters and used a Holley Terminator to control it. The throttle body was a two barrel deal, that looked like two single barrels. The throttle body I believe, had its own IAC.
     
    19Eddy30 likes this.
  27. ActionYobbo
    Joined: Mar 28, 2022
    Posts: 346

    ActionYobbo
    Member

    Yeah the idea was 2 separate systems. Each sniper controlling a bank of 4 cylinders unaware that there is also another 4 attached at the crank. The trigger wire from the coil would need to go to both.
     
  28. 19Eddy30
    Joined: Mar 27, 2011
    Posts: 3,834

    19Eddy30
    Member
    from VA

    @Mike Lawless ,
    If the snipper 1100 has same program witch I am sure same in all Snippers TBI's, The Snipper 2 I do not Know same ? I have not looked into the
    S-2" what was up grade's " difference".
    The Snipper 1 on the 1100 says laptop
    Tunning should able to adjust fuel psi requirements & change duty cycle on the injector in this case 2 the Ecu thinking 1 injector, because you would
    Be piggybacking just injectors.
    On both TBI's the internal fuel pressure regulator needs to be removed,
    The bigger 4500 uses a external regulator which is better . For LapTop
    Tunning
    I do not know if Holley make dual TPI for the 1100 to be piggybacked like other
    S-1 & S-2's . Holley web catalogue not easy to navigate search.

    @ActionYobbo The way you where wanting to use the 1100 is doable
    Just not sold pre made bolt on parts .
    Custom & thinking out side box.
    Let's just talk distributors
    2 4 cylinder cap distributors
    Dual distributor Drive.
    One to fire 4 cylinders Driver side
    One for the Passenger side
    Phased in way to fire cylinders
    correct order on each side .
    & 2 coils one per side / each distributor.

    or use One V8 distributor
    Making 2 custom 4 lobe cam's
    Stack on top of each other phased to fire
    Each side correct ,
    Like a dual point , but separate Cam's .
    2 pick ups
    One coil,
    Set Both ECU's to 4 cylinder but in Reality 8 cylinders. Each ECU thinks
    Its a 4 cylinder ..
    even doing this way with 2 independent ECU's to be close to Balance on each side of engine You would have to deal with
    2 TPS
    2 coolant temps
    2 O2 's
    2 maps
    2 IAC .. maybe you see the thinking.

    On one engine combo I working on
    I was able to use a regular distributor ECU thinking it was a Hyper spark Distributor. "Timing Control"
    Just with a regular distributor & crank trigger
     
  29. Mike Lawless
    Joined: Sep 20, 2021
    Posts: 718

    Mike Lawless

    The last time I looked, there was no "Sniper2" version of the 1100. Is there now? I'd imagine there is close to zero interest in piggybacking 1100s, as most would go for the 2300 if they wanted two barrels.
    If not, the ECU is contained within the unit itself. The 1100 also has an internal fuel pressure regulator. Which is why I believe you need to treat as two separate systems. I know the Sniper 2 is now externally regulated, as well as having the ECU as a separate box. This adds to the cost.
    As far as using a laptop for tuning, I'd imagine you'd need to do that, although the "Wizard" should allow you to get a base tune to get it running. But that's about all the 3.5" handheld is good for. I only use mine as a display for EFI functions on a temporary basis. I use a laptop to dial in the tune.
    Now it's opinion time. Just an opinion, and I am not an expert by any stretch on EFI systems. But I have learned a lot in the last couple years I've been dinkin' with on Ol' Furd.
    I think you would be better off both from a tuning, as well as a financial standpoint, to run two throttle bodies from a single controller. Only one would need the IAC, and everything else would be able to operate with single sensor inputs.
    I don't know how you would do that however, with the 1100, since it is internally controlling its injector, IAC, fuel pump operation and pressure, temp inputs etc.
    The 1100, at least in my case, had a few "quirks."
    • It would flood easily once warm, so a specific starting routine had to be learned.
    • Most times, the idle would drop and sometimes stall running up to a stop. Maybe automatic trans cars didn't see this happen, but roll up to a stop, clutch it, and the rpm would drop momentarily to the point of stalling. Sometimes it would stumble and recover, most times stall unless I was "johnny on the spot" covering the throttle. It took quite a bit of fiddling in the software to make that livable. Could not get it all the way out.
    • It did get good fuel mileage out on the road. In town, not so much. But then it's still not great in town with the Terminator system either.
     
  30. ActionYobbo
    Joined: Mar 28, 2022
    Posts: 346

    ActionYobbo
    Member

    Yes I see the problem with the trigger wire giving 8 signals instead of 4
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.