Register now to get rid of these ads!

early f.e.d.pilots that ran a cad lasalle box

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by rd martin, Dec 29, 2008.

  1. If you just need a bearing retainer on the rear, not some kind of tail housing, The front bearing from a Frd toploader with the 1 3/8" input has the same outside dimensions as the Lasalle front and rear. Four drilled and tapped holes, DONE
     
    Last edited: Sep 18, 2009
  2. Little Wing
    Joined: Nov 25, 2005
    Posts: 7,565

    Little Wing
    Member
    from Northeast


    so your saying just that on the back and you have a shorter box set up for open drive ??
     
  3. timothale
    Joined: Feb 3, 2007
    Posts: 234

    timothale
    Member

    the packard is better. has synchro's on first. You don't show the front bearing retainer for your throw out bearing to slide on. If the front ball bearing is not locked in right with the front retainer it can move. I ****tered my lasalle cus I used the ford piece without checking to see if it held the front bearing in the right position. Lasalle and packard have higher speeds in first and second than most other cars of the era. they work good on the street with 4.11 or 4.56 gears. less rpm drop when you shift. I still have the packard overdrive in my roadster I built in the early 60's My brother used the rear casting off some flathead era trans and drilled and tapped the back of a buick roadmaster heavy duty box. . real backyard he cut strips of shim stock and glued then to the spline teeth to get a good tight fit.
     
  4. Kerry
    Joined: May 16, 2001
    Posts: 5,155

    Kerry
    Member

    The packard might be a good street option but this thread was about front engine dragsters. A syncro for first really doesn't matter. Not a lot of downshifting going on in the quarter. How does the Packard stand up to ritualistic abuse and HP?
     
  5. Little Wing
    Joined: Nov 25, 2005
    Posts: 7,565

    Little Wing
    Member
    from Northeast

    No retainer ?? all mine do

    The later Packards will take a beating,,bigger gears and shafts
     

    Attached Files:

    Last edited: Nov 2, 2009
  6. timothale
    Joined: Feb 3, 2007
    Posts: 234

    timothale
    Member

    The packard has better synchro's 2 -3 If he is going to be able to use reverse to back up to restage, synchro's on first doesn't put any fillings when grinding the gears. another thing to strengthen to box is to use full length roller bearings in the cluster. sometimes you have to ream out the gear if only the ends are finish machined / stack as many rollers as you can then make up a spacer for the difference or sometimes they had a thin tube spacer in the cluster. you can cut to fit.
     
  7. Kerry
    Joined: May 16, 2001
    Posts: 5,155

    Kerry
    Member

    Reverse would be nice but not really needed. That's what your crew is for. ;-) These gearboxes were used in FED's before burnouts.
     
  8. timothale
    Joined: Feb 3, 2007
    Posts: 234

    timothale
    Member

    the pict of the lasalle doesn' show the retainer. If I remember right the retainer did not bolt to the trans but was held in place by the bellhousing . and did not always end up with the trans.. some of the adaptor plates were not machined right to position it and hold the front trans bearing
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.