Register now to get rid of these ads!

Technical Early Hemi intake / history

Discussion in 'Traditional Hot Rods' started by 3w Hank, Dec 18, 2025.

  1. George
    Joined: Jan 1, 2005
    Posts: 8,050

    George
    Member

    slayer likes this.
  2. 1946caddy
    Joined: Dec 18, 2013
    Posts: 2,520

    1946caddy
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from washington

    The main criteria for your or any engine for the purpose of carburetor CFM is the cubic inches. Talked to the guy at Hot Heads and he said that he has a 331 Hemi with their aluminum heads, and high rise 4 bbl dual plain intake and he recommends 500 CFM carburation based on their dyno testing.
    I'm building a 331 55 Chrysler with 10-1 pistons, mild street cam, mild head work, dual plane high rise and headers. I asked about using a 600 Holley for dyno testing and maybe use afterwards and he said the 600 would be too much. Recommended a 500-550 cfm.
    https://www.inchcalculator.com/carburetor-size-calculator/
    The Hemi engine is such a large impressive looking engine and it's hard to deck it all out in chrome and have a small 2 or 4 bbl carb sitting on top when the hood is up. Dual fours or other multi carburation setups just look right on the engine wither they hurt performance or not. Most of the people running a early Hemi in a period correct hot rod do so for the looks, not the performance.
     
    Last edited: Mar 12, 2026
    slayer and Olcars like this.
  3. George
    Joined: Jan 1, 2005
    Posts: 8,050

    George
    Member

    How many people know the Volumetric efficiency of the engine? And unless your racing with a tach that can be checked how much is max RPM on the typical engine? One "rule of thumb" method is to double the CID & the multiply by .8. 331X2=662. 662X .8 = 529 CFM .
     
    silent rick likes this.
  4. tubman
    Joined: May 16, 2007
    Posts: 8,355

    tubman
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    I have a '54 331 bored .060 with 12.5:1 pistons, an Engle roller tappet cam and other ***orted goodies in my dirt modified (avatar). I have run a variety of intakes on it from a stock 4 BBL to 4 in a row 97's and everything worked fine for vintage racing except the 4 BBL. Right now, I'm running 2 large-base 2G's adapted to a Weiand dual quad manifold (mainly for looks). Truth be told, the best the car ever ran was with a 500 Holley dirt track two BBL adapted to a the stock 4 BBL manifold, but it didn't look right. I do have the rev limiter set at 5500 RPM (I have a LOT of money in this engine and this is exhibition racing), so I'm sure that has a major effect on the overall performance, but I think it shows that 500-550 CFM is probably enough on the street.
     
    silent rick and 1946caddy like this.
  5. I've run the 3x2 Stromberg 97's (SBC), 2x4 edelbrocks (Nailhead 401) and the single 4bbl. Of all the setups if you are going for reliability I'd go single 4bbl. If you want cool factor, go 97's with the frog mouth breathers. Never tried the inline 4 carbs, sounds like a headache.
     
  6. 1946caddy
    Joined: Dec 18, 2013
    Posts: 2,520

    1946caddy
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from washington

  7. tubman
    Joined: May 16, 2007
    Posts: 8,355

    tubman
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    This brings out a couple of thoughts. When I was in my late teens, one of the local guys had an early fifties Pontiac coupe with an Olds Rocket in it (any easy swap if you used the Hydramatic). He ran 6 twos with the aforementioned "frog's mouth" scoops, with their insides painted bright orange. It had a big rake and he didn't run a hood and when you saw that thing comin' at ya', it was COOL! Also, for a while I ran 4 inline 97's on a Weiand manifold on my dirt car. It ran fine, but for some reason, the carbs got messed up and I had to rebuild them every season. This got a little old after a couple of years, so when some guy made me an obscene offer for that setup, they went down the road.
     
    Last edited: Mar 23, 2026

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.