Register now to get rid of these ads!

Technical Engine from an auto into a manual car

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by Malarky, Oct 15, 2023.

  1. Malarky
    Joined: Oct 23, 2009
    Posts: 333

    Malarky
    Member

    Hey guys. I’m looking at picking up a 1960 Falcon with a 144 i6 and a 3 speed manual transmission. My question is… I found a 200 i6 out of a 66 mustang with automatic transmission. I want to keep the 3 speed. What would be needed to mate the 200 into the falcon?
     
  2. Wizard1926
    Joined: Jun 17, 2023
    Posts: 110

    Wizard1926

    I did something very similar 20+ years ago, but thinking everything was interchangeable between the 2
    Could be wrong, heck memory isn't what it used to be.
    I'm sure someone with better memory or knowledge will chime in.
     
    Malarky and hrm2k like this.
  3. Wanderlust
    Joined: Oct 27, 2019
    Posts: 1,016

    Wanderlust

    Can’t speak as to your situation but one thing I have noticed is engines that have lived behind an auto trans don’t often survive long being put behind a manual trans, my thoughts on this is the greater rpm swing, rods or rings usually fail
     
  4. Budget36
    Joined: Nov 29, 2014
    Posts: 15,027

    Budget36
    Member

    If the same engine family, I’d think only a pilot bearing/bushing in the crank might be needed.
     
  5. Phil P
    Joined: Jan 1, 2018
    Posts: 534

    Phil P
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    You will have to wait and see but the crank isn't necessarily going to be drilled for a pilot bearing.

    Phil
     
    Budget36 likes this.
  6. That's the potential problem, if crank is not drilled. If drilled and just empty, easy to just get correct pilot bearing and install. I'm not a Ford expert, but I bel i6 eve the 144/170/200/250 engine family should have basic interchange. Especially the 200 for a 144.
     
    alanp561 likes this.
  7. BJR
    Joined: Mar 11, 2005
    Posts: 11,031

    BJR
    Member

    I have run into that before, but not on that specific engine family. Where the crank was not drilled for a pilot bushing. Had to change the crank on an AMC V8 because of that years ago. But just the opposite, the crank from a stick didn't have a big enough hole in the crank to fit the hub from the torque converter.
     
  8. PackardV8
    Joined: Jun 7, 2007
    Posts: 1,309

    PackardV8
    Member

    The small Ford six can have two different size bellhousings. If they're the same, you're golden. All the cranks we've seen were drilled for the pilot, as manuals were more common back in the day.

    Anything's possible, but having been there when those engines were new, I've never noticed any problems with longevity when changing from stick to auto or vice versa. Those little devils don't make enough horsepower to hurt themselves.

    jack vines
     
  9. Last edited: Oct 15, 2023
  10. Malarky
    Joined: Oct 23, 2009
    Posts: 333

    Malarky
    Member

    I wanted to add that both the engine and transmission of both vehicles are very low mileage.
     
    alanp561 likes this.
  11. jimmy six
    Joined: Mar 21, 2006
    Posts: 16,669

    jimmy six
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    From personal experience every used engine that had an automatic I put in a manual transmission car or anyone I changed to a manual transmission from an automatic in a car the rear main seal started leaking. For the most part an automatic trans engine crankshaft stays in the same spot but a manual moves as you step on the clutch. The main sealing area of the cranks have different wear patterns.
     
    Truckdoctor Andy and alanp561 like this.
  12. chevy57dude
    Joined: Dec 10, 2007
    Posts: 9,334

    chevy57dude
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    1. Maryland HAMBers

    Possibly because the vehicle is now driven in a more ''spirited'' way?
     
    Truckdoctor Andy and Wanderlust like this.
  13. Wanderlust
    Joined: Oct 27, 2019
    Posts: 1,016

    Wanderlust

    Quite likely, I know I did ;) Usually took out the top rings on the cylinder ridge
     
    chevy57dude likes this.
  14. sunbeam
    Joined: Oct 22, 2010
    Posts: 6,383

    sunbeam
    Member

    Last edited: Oct 15, 2023
    lumpy 63, alanp561 and Malarky like this.
  15. RodStRace
    Joined: Dec 7, 2007
    Posts: 7,641

    RodStRace
    Member

    Sorry, I can't help with this exact question. I do know Ford in the 60s and more recently tended to throw everything and the kitchen sink at engineering issues, meaning interchange is a concern, just like your post. Sure hope someone can answer your question with hard fact.
     
  16. Kerrynzl
    Joined: Jun 20, 2010
    Posts: 3,553

    Kerrynzl
    Member

    It should be simple.

    And the 144-170-200 pilot bushing is the same.
    If the starter has 3 bolts it is a 8.5" clutch [2 bolts = 9"clutch]

    The flywheel should swap over [both engines are internal balanced]
    8.5” clutches use a “dished” 132 Tooth flywheel
    9” clutches use a “flat” 136 Tooth flywheel.

    You can't mix'n'match clutch flywheel and bell between 8.5" and 9" [it is either all one or all the other]

    Between 1966 to 1968 some of these 200 blocks have a dual pattern for both 8.5” and 9” style bell housings and clutches.
    Here:
    upload_2023-10-16_16-26-21.png
    Ford changed bellhousing pattern for the 200 in 1968 for the larger 9" clutch flywheel only.

    The lower dowels and bolts are the same on both types , so the block can be lined up drilled and tapped for 2 uppers if needed.

    Or you can simply hunt down a 9" flywheel , Bell , Clutch ,and Starter [which would be cheap]

    You can adapt late blocks early 8.5" bellhousing but not the other way round, because the early 144- 170 blocks cannot be drilled to the larger bellhousing

    here's why
    upload_2023-10-16_16-39-12.png
     
    Last edited: Oct 16, 2023
  17. Malarky
    Joined: Oct 23, 2009
    Posts: 333

    Malarky
    Member

    This is all some great information, and I really appreciate it. I knew I’d get some answers here.
     
    alanp561 likes this.
  18. sunbeam
    Joined: Oct 22, 2010
    Posts: 6,383

    sunbeam
    Member

    While you are at it I would up grade to a non load o matic distributor 1968 and up . it will require the oil pump and oil pump drive because the drive went from 1/4 to 5/16 It is well worth it
     
    Malarky likes this.
  19. ekimneirbo
    Joined: Apr 29, 2017
    Posts: 5,147

    ekimneirbo
    Member
    from Brooks Ky

    Try Amazon
    81e8lNBFvLL._AC_UY218_.jpg
     
    Mr48chev and Malarky like this.

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.