Register now to get rid of these ads!

Projects First Hotrod 28 Sedan Please help

Discussion in 'Traditional Hot Rods' started by Smithshotrodinterior, Aug 6, 2025 at 11:22 PM.

  1. 19Eddy30
    Joined: Mar 27, 2011
    Posts: 3,449

    19Eddy30
    Member
    from VA

    A traditional build of 1932 ,
    AV8 ? That would be a very early .
    More likely 1940 AV8.
    But realistically most I would say 1950
    & earlier is Traditional.
    My thinking of Traditional , Do not know how to word thinking.
    Pick a time frame , any parts that year
    & older , tractor , automotive , plane
    Industrial ext.
    I look , think Most only know what was seen in Mag's ..
    In Reality Mag photographers did not venture outside of Southern California
    Until like 55 , maybe little later .
    Even the state of Ca .
    USA big place , even other countries
    There was alot of out side thinking , building going on that was not seen , just maybe by few in a small town ,
    Did not know what was going on in next town over , up to mid 90s .
    Not every one had
    Film , I come from line did not take pictures of every thing seen , done
    For me really until 07 camera phone
    , still do not take that many pics ,

    I really only have / seen every issue
    Of H-R mag from 48- 73 ish
    Neat thing in early years from the West Coast.
    Then other mags scatter years to present.
    Hot Roding is unique Thinking in early years ,
    Same with Land Speed, Roundly Round
    Mig , dirt , Grand Prix ,to Indy,
    Until 1974ish .
     
  2. 19Eddy30
    Joined: Mar 27, 2011
    Posts: 3,449

    19Eddy30
    Member
    from VA

    @Smithshotrodinterior
    What Year / Era is traditional to you?
    From 1932 Year to Present ,
    Each year is different
    Era style ,Look !
    Not trying to split hairs ,
    You post / thread is in
    Traditional ...
     
  3. to be honest Im not even sure I guess I like the stuff they where doing in the 40s 50s as far as the looks, But im not as much a purist as most here, I really like the traditional look, But i want a dependable drivetrain that i dont care to throw my family in and head out on a road trip, I wanna keep the spirit of the car intact but not build something thats a unreliable money pit
     
  4. 19Eddy30
    Joined: Mar 27, 2011
    Posts: 3,449

    19Eddy30
    Member
    from VA

    @Smithshotrodinterior
    Sound like mid 60 to 70ish
    If a pick your part , pull your part near by
    If you can do most all work your self
    With little bling , stock ,mild
    305 ,350 cid Vortec 300hp
    Glide, 350 400 700r
    Can be done for less then 10k
    Even 8k
    Not including price of car .
    Shop parts New & used .
    Other might say No ,
    But yes you can
     
    Just Gary likes this.
  5. banjorear
    Joined: Jul 30, 2004
    Posts: 4,735

    banjorear
    Member

    The nice thing about using a Model A frame is it's pretty open down the middle and the crossmembers can be cut out or modified and new ones can be made from flat stock if you decide to use something like a T5 behind a flathead V8. Some guys use that mid-80's Ford pick up 3 speed with O/D as well. I forget the model of that trans.

    A flathead with a T5 is one of the best things you can do for drivability. There is a little more to it than just throwing a S-10 trans behind it since the gearing isn't that well suited for an old Ford. It takes some swapping stuff around to get the gear set up that will allow you to drive across country with keeping you happy and your motor working within its sweet spot.

    My AV8 is a strict traditional car with a '42 and before time frame in mind. Honestly, I'm thinking of swapping in a Jeep T-5. The old Ford 3 speed gets old if you plan to drive the car for any distance. Having 5 gears with an O/D is a game changer.

    Anyone who has done that swap can't believe how much more drivable the car becomes. If you are willing to swap out the Model A rear for, say a '40, you can convert it open drive. You'll just need to figure out how to keep the rear in place and add a panard bar to keep it from swaying side to side since you won't have the torque tube to do that.
     
    Just Gary likes this.
  6. alchemy
    Joined: Sep 27, 2002
    Posts: 22,316

    alchemy
    Member

    That kit is junk. The axle is Chinese scrap iron. I can tell from the small pic even. Death waiting to happen.

    Seems you need some guidance. If you don’t buy from a trusted source, at least ask us to take a look before you pull the trigger.
     
    Primered Forever and 19Eddy30 like this.
  7. Forged I-Beam Split Wishbone Front End Kit please tell me thats a good one
     
  8. alchemy
    Joined: Sep 27, 2002
    Posts: 22,316

    alchemy
    Member

    Much better, but you can’t tell the width of the axle. I think a 46” axle looks best in a full fendered A. Especially if you get it real low so the tires tuck up into the fenders like the dark green example you posted.
     
  9. I pulled my fenders, running boards and aprons off this evening, the aprons had quite abit of rot i couldn't really see when they was on the car, but just like those old gear heads decades ago, as soon as I stood back and looked at it with no fender, I was like wow, now its looking like a hot rod lol, So i may ditch the fenders, Verdicts still out
     
  10. alchemy
    Joined: Sep 27, 2002
    Posts: 22,316

    alchemy
    Member

    Still buy a 46” axle.
     
    Just Gary likes this.
  11. Turns out this axle I bought is 47''
     
  12. 19Eddy30
    Joined: Mar 27, 2011
    Posts: 3,449

    19Eddy30
    Member
    from VA

    @Smithshotrodinterior
    On Rear cross member
    To get to set lower , more then 1-1/2 from stock , thought needs to be taken , part of rear crossmember is also
    rear body mounts
    On model A frame
    Also need to think where you going go mount Battery,
    & A frame is Narrow run's directly down the center of the front seats planning mounts and transmission is critical in mock up you run out of a lot of space you might see some other 28 to 31 they are on 32 frames which is a lot wider and follows the body shape without fenders and running boards.
    If your seats have the factory flip up hinge seats save those parts hard to find.
    If removing front seat You need narrow I believe it's 40ish inches from door-to-door on the inside, & tall like me I had to move front seat back 6 inches from stock , I am 6 ft tall , pedles also if you have big feet
     
    Last edited: Aug 7, 2025 at 9:57 PM
  13. Im considering doing a four link and coilovers in the rear
     
  14. 19Eddy30
    Joined: Mar 27, 2011
    Posts: 3,449

    19Eddy30
    Member
    from VA

    Still there's an issue with the stock frame thought needs to be taken ,
    I did things different I notched axle tube's so I could use stock crossmember.
    Most would not do this mold
    Look @ both pic of frame you will see difference in the rear stock versus hotrod
    In the picture I posted earlier was my A I dayley drove and drag race with stock frame with the engine north of 650hp
    100mph in 1/8
    IMG_3767.jpeg IMG_3768.jpeg
     
    Just Gary likes this.
  15. banjorear
    Joined: Jul 30, 2004
    Posts: 4,735

    banjorear
    Member

    '26/'27 T rear cross member lowers the car by 1.5" and is a direct fit for the stock Model A rear crossmember.
     
  16. https://www.hotrod.com/how-to/solid-axle-front-suspension-details
     
    Deutscher and Grumpy ole A like this.
  17. Grumpy ole A
    Joined: Jun 22, 2023
    Posts: 248

    Grumpy ole A
    Member

  18. after taking the fenders off, i think ill leave them off for good, which bring us to our next adventure, putting this car on 32 frame rails
     

    Attached Files:

  19. 19Eddy30
    Joined: Mar 27, 2011
    Posts: 3,449

    19Eddy30
    Member
    from VA

    Two molds Need to be done
    Pinch rails @ front.
    @ kick up near rear needs to be flatten
    For body to set flat on frame rail or modify sub rail on body .
    Buy rails weld & modify your self $2,400 ish
    Or purchase one $6k up

    IMG_3778.jpeg
     
    Just Gary likes this.
  20. Primered Forever
    Joined: Jul 7, 2008
    Posts: 992

    Primered Forever
    Member
    from Joplin,MO

    IMG_1631.jpeg I used a 47 inch forged with 145/15 front tires and there’s no rub.
     
    Just Gary and don colaps like this.
  21. don colaps
    Joined: Nov 29, 2007
    Posts: 215

    don colaps
    Member

    Not what you asked for, but… I vote for full fendered all day long. I mean, since you already have all the stuff. Model A sedans just looks so great with their traditional fenders left mounted.
    And with all that said, I’m gonna head away and work on my non-fendered tudor sedan…which I kinda wish it wasn’t…!
     

    Attached Files:

  22. They look good both ways, im still not completely sure which direction im going, I have a customers 32 tudor here doing the upholstery in it and I love the stance it has with no fenders
     
    don colaps likes this.
  23. banjorear
    Joined: Jul 30, 2004
    Posts: 4,735

    banjorear
    Member

    '28/'29 A's on a '32 frame scream hot rod. You don't need to pinch the frame if you don't want to. If you rather not, you'll need to slightly pie cut the lower portion of the cowl. Either way you go, you will need to notch the rear sub rails if using a '32 frame and may have to relocated the cross member hump under the rear seat.
     
  24. Love this!! body is slighty channeled on the deuce rails...I think!

    Theres a bit difference between the past and present interpretation of a hot rod... maybe in the past a common swap of putting a model a ford body on a 32 frame, was looking for porsuit more speed and power with less care about aesthetics.

    That golden sedan sure have a lot of frame and body work!!
     

    Attached Files:

  25. unless I find a better option, Im thinking of buying the speedway 32 rails and maybe use my model a front cross member for the spring and make the rest of them, Im a fairly proficient fabricator, and have a decent arsenal of tools, im not scared to tackle much
     
  26. that car has a killer stance, I wonder if they where able to keep the back seat with the rear that low
     
  27. 29Sleeper
    Joined: Oct 25, 2023
    Posts: 408

    29Sleeper
    Member
    from SoCal

    Jim Brierley built a B with his 7:1 head, C crank, 1R Winfield cam, larger intake valves and mild porting. Dynoed at 107 hp with a single 97. I suggested the T5 as a money saver. My car came with a 39 trans and Mitchel overdrive. Today installing a T5 will be about 60% of cost the 39 & Mitchel. Plus you end up with an open driveline so it's easy to run a later rearend or QC.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.