Register now to get rid of these ads!

Projects Five Kustom Bargains to be Had!

Discussion in 'Traditional Customs' started by Jive-Bomber, Nov 6, 2025 at 8:45 AM.

  1. Jive-Bomber
    Joined: Aug 21, 2001
    Posts: 3,940

    Jive-Bomber
    MODERATOR

    Jive-Bomber submitted a new blog post:

    Five Kustom Bargains to be Had!

    Continue reading the Original Blog Post
     
    Last edited: Nov 7, 2025 at 12:07 PM
    tractorguy, Sharpone and 51 mercules like this.
  2. 32Stoker
    Joined: Jul 1, 2015
    Posts: 416

    32Stoker
    Member

    Love the factory customs!
    At the top of my list are the 1960 Pontiacs…
     
    Last edited: Nov 7, 2025 at 11:09 AM
    rod1, tractorguy, Sharpone and 4 others like this.
  3. HEMI32
    Joined: Sep 6, 2006
    Posts: 8,555

    HEMI32
    Member

    @Jive-Bomber Jay Ward -

    Just an FYI that the 1955 Chrysler 300 was actually known as the "C 300" (with a 331ci HEMI) . . . it wasn't until 1956 that the Chrysler 300 "Letter Series" began:
    • '56 "300 B" (with a 354ci HEMI)
    • '57 "300 C" (with a 392ci HEMI)
    • '58 "300 D" (with a 392ci HEMI)
    • '59 "300 E" (with a 413ci Wedge)
    • '60 "300 F" (with a 413ci Wedge)
    • '61 "300 G" (with a 413ci Wedge)
    • '62 "300 H" (with a 413ci Wedge)
    • '63 "300 J" (with a 413ci Wedge)
    • '64 "300 K" (with a 413ci Wedge)
    • '65 "300 L" (with a 413ci Wedge)

    Note that the photo you posted is the "VIN #1 '55 C 300" . . . a car once owned by HAMBer Josh @Hyfire Ackerman (checkout his
    Help! Chrysler 300 Racecar (Daytona Beach) thread).

    Josh ended up selling this car (& his Norm Thatcher '58 300D Bonneville racecar) to Mike McCandless (son of Herb "Mr. 4-Speed" McCandless).

    Mike had Whitehall Auto Restorations bring the "VIN #1 '55 C 300" back to its 1955 Daytona Beach racecar configuration:


    - Todd @HEMI32 Olson
     
    Last edited: Nov 6, 2025 at 11:44 PM
    lurker mick likes this.
  4. stuart in mn
    Joined: Nov 22, 2007
    Posts: 2,760

    stuart in mn
    Member

    One minor correction, Pontiacs had ball joint suspensions beginning in 1958.
     
  5. 57JoeFoMoPar
    Joined: Sep 14, 2004
    Posts: 6,489

    57JoeFoMoPar
    Member

    It's an interesting consideration that these cars are bargains. I think it depends on what your goals are. If the goal is to buy a finished car, and go cruise, then sure, I can get behind that. If the goal is to do a complete build with a refurbished drivetrain, rebuilt chassis, new chrome, and so on, then I disagree. Any orphaned model or make is going to cost more in every facet than a more common model/make other than initial buy in. This applies ten-fold if you have to pay for labor. It is ALWAYS cheaper to replace than repair, and parts cost significantly less than labor.

    I can attest to this first-hand. When I put my 61 Olds on air, no kit exists for this car. It took me hours of sawing up steel plate, welding, fabricating, reengineering, and so on, to make it happen. If I had to pay someone $100/hr to do that work, it would have been a $10,000 job. If I had a 61 Chevy, I could have just bought the parts for like $1500 and installed them.

    Then compare the cost of rebuilding the drivetrain. Just using the examples set forth, consider the cost of a brand new SBC delivered to your door, or parts to rebuild one, then consider the cost to rebuild a Hemi, a 368 Lincoln, a 365 Cadillac....

    So I agree that these cars may represent strong values on the turn key market, but if the purpose is to build one, it's a losing proposition in the end. But the money isn't why we do it, right?
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.