Register now to get rid of these ads!

Projects flathead vs sbc engine in a ford coupe

Discussion in 'Traditional Hot Rods' started by clips221, Dec 24, 2013.

  1. jkeesey
    Joined: Oct 12, 2011
    Posts: 652

    jkeesey
    Member

    I think I just threw up a little.
     
  2. dsiddons
    Joined: Mar 6, 2006
    Posts: 1,575

    dsiddons
    Member
    from Indiana

    Heads are new, funky looking valve cover breather thingy, bet its got a electric fan?????
     
  3. tenfive0
    Joined: Nov 10, 2013
    Posts: 19

    tenfive0
    Member

    Ford TUFF with CHEVY STUFF. SBC is the way to go for me. I think Flatheads are cool but I've bin working on SBC since I was a kid that everything else seems foreign to me. Easy and cheap to work on, dependable and a good payoff and return in horsepower.
     
  4. Rich Wright
    Joined: Jan 9, 2008
    Posts: 3,918

    Rich Wright

    the valve covers are genuine Corvette items and the breathers are vintage Moon parts.
    No electric fan.
     
  5. dsiddons
    Joined: Mar 6, 2006
    Posts: 1,575

    dsiddons
    Member
    from Indiana

    Traditionally styled hot rod. This should be all in the other section. Beautiful car by all means. This crate motor talk and all doesn't belong in here. When someone says: Flatheads are over rated in this forum a red flag should raise. 800 parts should be elsewhere.


    Posted using the Full Custom H.A.M.B. App!
     
  6. Rich Wright
    Joined: Jan 9, 2008
    Posts: 3,918

    Rich Wright

    If you carry that philosophy to a logical conclusion then wouldn't only vintage parts originally installed by the factory qualify a car as being traditional?


    The 276 FH for my roadster was not installed in a car at the factory...it was a replacement (crate) engine at one time, as were a large number of FH's now seeing hot rod duty. Plus it has Brookville body...Not traditional?

    The stock 99T in my sedan was a factory installed engine in a '40 1 ton truck and I can count a total of less than 25 parts/components on the car that were made after '48 including paint, upholstery, glass, wiring, tires/tubes, steel brake lines and hoses and also includes coolant and oil, and even the new, store bought rebuild kit for the 94 carb. so I'm definitely aware of the theory of staying true to the era. I just don't view it as that big a deal in all cases.

    The 283 in my '36 is a '58 that i took great pains to restore back to factory specs, including using as many original factory nuts and bolts as was reasonably possible. But....I have it mated to '66 Mustang C4 and the banjo rear has been converted to slip in 28 spline axles....concessions made because it's my wife's truck. No longer traditional?

    I don't really buy into the whole definition/categorizing business anyway....I'm building the same kind of cars I was building as a kid.
    They weren't "traditional" then and, as far as I'm concerned, they aren't traditional now.

    They're just Hot Rods

    They're fun to build and drive.

    That's the only real criteria I have.
     
  7. Dan Hay
    Joined: Mar 16, 2007
    Posts: 6,413

    Dan Hay
    Member

    I think this is really splitting hairs. With that logic NO reproduction parts should be used ever. Throw away that Drake catalog, it aint real!

    283, 265 or crate 350 dressed properly, there are more important things in life to worry about.
     
  8. Rich Wright
    Joined: Jan 9, 2008
    Posts: 3,918

    Rich Wright

  9. blowby
    Joined: Dec 27, 2012
    Posts: 8,664

    blowby
    Member
    from Nicasio Ca

  10. aonemarine
    Joined: Nov 2, 2013
    Posts: 500

    aonemarine
    Member
    from Delaware

    Just to get my whack in on the dead horse, would the scat 4.125" stroker crank for the flat head be considered traditional?? Think I really care if it isn't?
     
  11. 68hillbilly
    Joined: May 10, 2007
    Posts: 158

    68hillbilly
    Member
    from KENTUCKY

    I'M going to throw my 2 cents worth in. Flathead would be great if you have plenty of cash. 289 ford would be nice and reliable make plenty of power and put old 60's stuff on it and it would look great. sbc is hands down the cheapest way to go. reliable too. choose any motor that runs good and dress it up right (old valve covers, old air cleaner, etc. needs oil filler tube also. )be great to drive around. Now if you really want to go hog wild and have a real trick 40, put a vintage hemi in it. Nothing looks better , but it will cost you lots of cash.
     
  12. 117harv
    Joined: Nov 12, 2009
    Posts: 6,586

    117harv
    Member

    Reasonable question, quit whining, get some @%& cheese???...really.

    Your question may be the most asked on here. Had you done as outlined in the rules, you could/would have been reading for days. The post below was taken from the rules sticky.

    5. Was your thread something that has been covered over and over again? Try searching next time. We've had countless threads through the years on bias tires vs. radials, the definition of "traditional," and many other topics. We don't need to rehash what the bulk of us already know.
     
  13. Brother Hesekiel
    Joined: Jun 26, 2011
    Posts: 6

    Brother Hesekiel
    Member

    Wow . . . 9 pages!

    I've searched on Google -- not the HAMB -- "Model A V8" and ended up here! And I've actually read every single post. So allow me to add a new twist to it, as that the reason I was searching for it.

    I have a "stock" 1931 Model A Roadster. Nice car, well running and driving, but it's the opposite of matching numbers. The VIN is the engine number which is a replacement engine from Long Beach Ford from God knows when (LBxxxx). My car has juice brakes all around, F-100 steering, '39 Ford transmission, Borg Warner overdrive and stock 4:11 rear end, as well as '35 wire wheels with 6.00-16 BW Firestones on all corners. The body was on a hot rod once, which I can tell by seeing that the rear wheel wells were once cut. So it's really healthy and quite attractive car, but it's not a preservation candidate in the traditional "stock" sense.

    The car runs great, and will do 55 or even 60 on the freeway, but that's really stressing the engine and me out. So I would like a bit more power, so that I can roll the 110 miles to the L.A. Roadster show and some other events without fear to blow up the engine. I figured, if I can get 100hp, I am happy.

    So here are my options:

    1) have my 4-banger redone with B crank, insert bearings, fully balanced, then spend big bucks on Riley head or something similar. Cost?

    2) Find an affordable, good running flatty which translates in a 21-stud engine, and mate it straight to my '39 3-speed tranny. Cost?

    3) Find a really old 283 or even 265 Chevy SB and rebuild it with low compression and a 2-barrel.

    I do NOT want to box the chassis, and I do not want to race the car., so I do not want lots of power. On the contrary! I want just enough power to cruise relaxed on the freeway at 65 or 70mph. So aside from affordability, I need to consider what it would take to install the engine in my car.

    What's your take on it?
     
  14. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 24,476

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    283, and box the chassis.
     
  15. Speed Gems
    Joined: Jul 17, 2012
    Posts: 6,919

    Speed Gems
    Member

    Again... like I said it all boils down to how much money and knowledge of flatheads you have, most guys today have very little of both.

    I'd go with number 3 and you shouldn't need to box the frame.
     
  16. Rich Wright
    Joined: Jan 9, 2008
    Posts: 3,918

    Rich Wright

    Sounds like you have a decent drivetrain as is......as an alternative to engine swapping you might first consider changing to 3:54 rear axle gears. That might get you close enough to 65-70 without all the work needed to swap engines.
     
  17. falcongeorge
    Joined: Aug 26, 2010
    Posts: 18,339

    falcongeorge
    Member
    from BC

    N/A? Hamb fairy dust...:rolleyes:
     
    Last edited: Dec 30, 2013
  18. Garry Carter
    Joined: Mar 11, 2002
    Posts: 575

    Garry Carter
    Member

    I have both a 327 and a `38 flattie. Love them both ... albeit for different reasons. What you really need to do is what you want to... the costs will sort themselves out. I'll guarantee you in only 2 years, regardless of which way you go, the $$$ won't mean jack shit!!
     
  19. hotrodderhaag
    Joined: Jan 22, 2007
    Posts: 2,142

    hotrodderhaag
    Member

    Best post yet!!


    Posted using the Full Custom H.A.M.B. App!
     
  20. Greg in Jax
    Joined: Jun 27, 2010
    Posts: 209

    Greg in Jax
    Member

    Rich Wright, I am enjoying your posts. Great! Given the what-is-traditional-and-what-is-not comments, the one that got me laughing was the comment about electric fans. I saw electric fans on flathead Fords in the late '50s and early '60s - heater fans mounted in front of the radiator in the (vain) hope that it would help against Kansas summer heat, I admit, but electric fans. I tried it once with an XK120 in the late '60s myself. Didn't work, of course. Hot rodding is about finding ways to make things work and the most interesting ideas come out of guys' garages. Just do what you want with your car and enjoy it
     
  21. johnybsic
    Joined: Oct 8, 2009
    Posts: 612

    johnybsic
    Member
    from las vegas

    We all know its gettin' a SBC. Don't fool yourself.
    It will be for good reason too.
    I had all kinds of feelings of romance and sentiment for flatties, Visions of cool-guyness. Crusin lonely desert hiways as the sun was going down. Being "one" with hotrodders of the past.
    Untill i had a ride in a nice flat powered coupe... (pedal to the floor). Hrmmmm. wait for itttttt.
    I'll be honest, Big block chevys have spoiled me.

    For my money, i'll take the best ratio of $$$:fast i can get, I dig hot rods and I'm cheap and i also like seeing something other than taillights around town.
    They are SUPER COOL engines, I like them for the same reason i like L6's, They are neat. BUT for my hotrod...gotta have alotta GO, while not breaking the bank.
    NOW my feelings may change later on, when i have bountiful cash and don't care how who beats me to the next stoplight and brags to their friends about "This old hotrod they smoked today".

    Just thought i'd throw in another useless opinion that wont matter once the OP decides to build his car.
     
  22. RobErnst
    Joined: Feb 13, 2009
    Posts: 62

    RobErnst
    Member

    I'll help

    Page 10 yet?
     
  23. page 10 here we come
     
  24. TERPU
    Joined: Jan 2, 2004
    Posts: 2,474

    TERPU
    Member

    [​IMG]


    I have had the pleasure of owning both of them. I still have SBC's and pound for pound the best engine ever made. Having said this they do get a little plain to the eyes. A Flathead is very high on the cool factor and if you can live with the power they posess at a reliable state stay with one. They can be made to cruise at 70 for years to come. But if you ever think you are going to win a race against an OH after second gear or plan on driving fast/beating on your engine you better put an OH in there. I had a great running early F'head in my Sedan and it got alot of really good comments. But Boring! Man oh man I'm just not happy unless I have power to spare. But also Boring is a SBC, and I'm ok with that on a full hood car. After all they Haul Ass. But for the best of both worlds and more torque you cannot beat and Olds or Caddy. Caddy is easier for the steering, but harder on the speed parts. Both are a common and TRADITIONAL swap. For a cool read look up the Hot Rod from June 1953. It'll inspire you.

    All the best,

    Tim
     
  25. blowby
    Joined: Dec 27, 2012
    Posts: 8,664

    blowby
    Member
    from Nicasio Ca

    Why I now drive a flathead.

    [​IMG]
     
  26. mad mikey
    Joined: Dec 22, 2013
    Posts: 9,393

    mad mikey
    Member

  27. Truckedup
    Joined: Jul 25, 2006
    Posts: 4,660

    Truckedup
    Member

    What are we looking at? I super sized the image but it's just a blur.
     
  28. ...LQQKIN' like a butt load of tickets to me...:cool:
     
  29. Truckedup
    Joined: Jul 25, 2006
    Posts: 4,660

    Truckedup
    Member

    Oh......... Fast,but not fast enough to outrun the cops :D
     
  30. back when i was involved with racing i heard a statement many times......a Ford engine takes twice the money to make them go half as fast as a Chevy
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.