Register now to get rid of these ads!

Flathead vs smallblock power estimate ??

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by ace high, Aug 13, 2009.

  1. ace high
    Joined: Dec 15, 2007
    Posts: 269

    ace high
    Member

    Just thinking out loud!! Would a 239 Flathead fitted with 8.5 aluminum heads, Isky Max-1, 2x2 94's, electronic dizzy w/high output coil give anywhere near the power of a "stock setup" 283 smallblock??
     
  2. Prolly not, but it would look cool.
     
  3. dieselc
    Joined: May 17, 2004
    Posts: 1,315

    dieselc
    Member
    from ohio

  4. that also depends on what "stock" 283 you are talking about. ;) I think the first 2bbl ones had about 170, that's doable.
     
  5. hombres ruin
    Joined: Nov 21, 2006
    Posts: 3,337

    hombres ruin
    Member

    oh, this old debate rearing its head again...go with the flathead,ditch the kragen motor(sbc)..you want to yawn every time you look under the hood..probably not,right?
     
  6. Sphynx
    Joined: Jan 31, 2009
    Posts: 1,141

    Sphynx
    Member
    from Central Fl

    Hey I am a small block chevy guy but a flatty is way cooler in looks and man they sound so damn good but if you got a hood it dont really matter .
     
  7. ace high
    Joined: Dec 15, 2007
    Posts: 269

    ace high
    Member

    I was just trying to gauge what the flatty should feel like with the configuration as I described. Recently completed one. Probably needs some more fine tuning with carbs & advance curve. Seems kind of doggy to me.
     
  8. Timing means a lot, any engine out of tune can be a "Dog".
     
  9. nsh57
    Joined: Mar 14, 2004
    Posts: 262

    nsh57
    Member

    I have a bit more cubes and a few more speed parts than what you described above, and I have been outrun by a stock 4 door impala with a tired 283.
    So have I ever wished I would have built my roadster with a sbc? NEVER! :D

    [​IMG]
     
  10. ace high
    Joined: Dec 15, 2007
    Posts: 269

    ace high
    Member

    Speaking of timing: I using a chevy Mallory unilite that I had Bubba machine down for me. I haven't myself made any changes to the mechanical advance at all. Initial timing is set about 10 degrees.
     
  11. cuznbrucie
    Joined: May 1, 2005
    Posts: 2,567

    cuznbrucie
    Member

    It's not about the HP or speed with a flathead.......it's about beauty, soul, and tradition........I don't care whether I can outrun a stock 283......probably can't.......

    [​IMG]

    CB
     
  12. nsh57
    Joined: Mar 14, 2004
    Posts: 262

    nsh57
    Member

    If you're looking for a transmission to make the best of the power you have, the T5 ****** will help the flatty tremendously. But it takes the right setup to really build some power from these engines.
     
  13. hombres ruin
    Joined: Nov 21, 2006
    Posts: 3,337

    hombres ruin
    Member

    What are you putting this set up in?.you know when it comes down to it for me i love flatheads for so many reasons,mainly i love the tradition of this mill,its a awesome looking set up with a freaking load of history to it,as being the first hot rod engine,its nostalgic to own a legendary motor and build it to your own specs,but i am not into going super fast,never have its cruising and enjoying my engine for what it is.Fact is flatheads are bad *** mills,have been since 32.
     
  14. dirty old man
    Joined: Feb 2, 2008
    Posts: 8,910

    dirty old man
    Member Emeritus

    Guess it depends a great deal on what you want, looks and tradition or performance.
    You can spend $10,000 on a flathead and outrun it real bad with a stock 350-300hp.
    But nothing beats a flathead for looks when it's fully dressed out, nothing sounds like a flathead when you spin the starter or when running. Hood or no hood, I can tell when it's a flathead just by the sound!
    But the roadster I'm building will have a built SBC, cause I like power more than tradition!
    Tradition is great, but when it comes to flatheads, I been there, done that, wore the T-shirt out 50 years ago.
    Dave
     
  15. hombres ruin
    Joined: Nov 21, 2006
    Posts: 3,337

    hombres ruin
    Member

    cuznbrucie you nailed it "SOUL"..well said and kick *** set up you have.
     
  16. ace high
    Joined: Dec 15, 2007
    Posts: 269

    ace high
    Member

    LOVE THE COIL !!!!!!!

    Actually I have to agree with all you've said
     
  17. ace high
    Joined: Dec 15, 2007
    Posts: 269

    ace high
    Member


    It's in a 28 hiboy on deuce rails
     
  18. Steves32
    Joined: Aug 28, 2007
    Posts: 1,257

    Steves32
    Member
    from So Cal

    Doggy eh?

    This should do it.

    [​IMG]
     
  19. cuznbrucie
    Joined: May 1, 2005
    Posts: 2,567

    cuznbrucie
    Member

    Thanks for the compliments guys........inside of that cast iron block there really is a *heartbeat*......and everybody knows the sound of it.......like nothing else......

    CB
     
  20. Buzznut
    Joined: May 9, 2008
    Posts: 2,349

    Buzznut
    Member

    Are you talking about the 270 hp (230 net) 283 or the 170 hp 283?
     
  21. ace high
    Joined: Dec 15, 2007
    Posts: 269

    ace high
    Member


    170 hp
     
  22. Buzznut
    Joined: May 9, 2008
    Posts: 2,349

    Buzznut
    Member

    Sure...I've heard of flatties putting out that kind of HP... what you need to do is rename this thread or start a new one or do a search and find out how to get there, because I'm definitely NOT a flattie expert.
     
  23. Hp is kind of irrelevant in many ways. The key to making a flattie is not in the number of carbs, the brand of heads etc, etc. It's in the revs. I know of a stock bore and stroke flattie that will beat a 283. It has mild relief. reworked heads and valves, twin 97s, cam and electronic ignition. The main work though is in the full pressure, full flow lubrication system, and in the blueprinting and balancing. The idea is to make the flattie rev way beyond its stock capabilities. The way to do this is by ensuring that the crank and rods are going to live. This is an area that the majority of flattie owners dont explore, but it's the key to serious flattie performance.
     
  24. choppedsled
    Joined: Jun 2, 2007
    Posts: 301

    choppedsled
    Member
    from Spokane WA

     
  25. oldskool30
    Joined: Jan 4, 2009
    Posts: 121

    oldskool30
    Member

    so whats your opinion of the harmonic balancer made by fluid damper for the front of a flatty in addition to having the motor , pressure plate balanced?
     
  26. 53sled
    Joined: Jul 5, 2005
    Posts: 5,817

    53sled
    Member
    from KCMO

    If you plan on running a hood, go fast, sbc. if you want to show it off, flatty.
    Speed costs, how fast do you wanna spend?
     
  27. brad chevy
    Joined: Nov 22, 2009
    Posts: 2,627

    brad chevy
    Member

    ALL my life I have been a CHEVYman,but there is nothing better looking than a dressed up FORD flathead,but as far as the power question,there is no comparison,SB has more power.but back in the real early 50s and before,flatheads ruled.
     
  28. belair
    Joined: Jul 10, 2006
    Posts: 9,036

    belair
    Member

    I think a lot of guys found out the answer to your question in 1957. But flat-motors are pretty.
     
  29. HEATHEN
    Joined: Nov 22, 2005
    Posts: 9,046

    HEATHEN
    Member
    from SIDNEY, NY

    ....or you could split the difference and put an early Cadillac or Olds in it.
     
  30. Jimmy2car
    Joined: Nov 26, 2003
    Posts: 1,707

    Jimmy2car
    Member
    from No. Cal

    Rockabillyb***man has it right.
    The correct combination and RPM is the winner. Look to the Kloth engine: 267 CI, almost 280 HP. Always shifted at 6200 RPM, went over 150 mph Bonneville. Still holds XFPRO record since 89-90. Still looks like a flathead, no extra exhaust ports, single 4 bbl carb. Fast..
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.