Register now to get rid of these ads!

Technical Ford trans measurement...

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by Crazy Steve, Jul 3, 2023.

  1. Can someone help me out and give me the length of the front bearing retainer/clutch sleeve from the face of the trans to the end of the sleeve? Thanks!!!
     
  2. Just so we're clear, what transmission?
     
    51 mercules likes this.
  3. '65-up, although I don't think it makes much difference. They should be all the same. I'm working with a C5TE FE truck bell and TKX trans. 'They' say it won't work, I'm going to prove 'em wrong...
     
    2Blue2 likes this.
  4. Marty Strode
    Joined: Apr 28, 2011
    Posts: 9,639

    Marty Strode
    Member

  5. That sounds about right, thanks Marty!
     
  6. Relic Stew
    Joined: Apr 17, 2005
    Posts: 1,238

    Relic Stew
    Member
    from Wisconsin

    I measured a big block toploader ('70 429) and a NP435 from an 80's pickup with a 300. I get the same as Marty on both. Maybe 3-25/32".

    RUG U.jpg NP435.jpg
     
  7. Excellent! Thanks again!
     
  8. ekimneirbo
    Joined: Apr 29, 2017
    Posts: 5,184

    ekimneirbo
    Member
    from Brooks Ky

    Do they say "why" it won't work? Length seems like a pretty simple thing to resolve. I'm wondering about the diameter of the retainer/housing bore or maybe bolt pattern.
     
  9. Yup, I measured a big in and big out Toploader and got 3 13/16 and I also measured a 3 speed grinder from a '56 T bird and got the same measurement.
     
  10. The crux of the matter is the TKO/TKX both use the .7" longer T5 input shaft. If you're building an SBF, simply using a T5 bell solves the problem. But in any other car application, a .7" thick spacer is used or you need a 'special' bell such as made by QuickTime ($1100!). These spacers are machined with a recess on the trans side for the front bearing retainer to fit into and have a 'faux' retainer on the bell side to index the trans.

    The '65-up manual car bells for the FE are almost as expensive as new aftermarket ones, typically in the $800 range. The deeper truck bells can be had for as little as $40, typically about $100, but 'they' say it won't work. Because the FE truck bell is .350" deeper, a spacer thickness of only .350" is needed. But after you machine the recess for the retainer in the thinner spacer, all you have is a hole; there's no meat left for the faux retainer and the trans retainer doesn't protrude enough to properly index the trans. The flange on the TKO/TKX retainer is 9/16" thick but because of a taper machined on it, it doesn't engage the bell deep enough. A cheaper '58-64 narrow-pattern car bell can be used, but even those are going up in price (locally they're up to $250 or more) and you still need the $250 .7" thick adaptor. On these the trans is bolted to the aluminum spacer, not the bellhousing, which I don't care for.

    My solution is two spacers; a simple-to-make 3/8" thick trans-to-bell spacer, and a same-thickness front bearing retainer spacer to ensure proper indexing, a bit more complicated but not excessively so. Material costs are about $50, saving a bunch of money if you can build your own (which I can). Besides the cost savings, the truck bell will also allow fitting a 11" clutch if so desired; not possible on every car bell, most are limited to a 10.5". I find it hard to believe no one is commercially making this set-up.

    The inquiry about the Ford bearing retainer was the last piece of the puzzle. The TKO/TKX retainer is 4.5" long, or about .7" longer than the OEM Ford retainer, so it may need a slight shortening. I'll detail all this once I start making the bits....
     
    Last edited: Jul 4, 2023
  11. Beanscoot
    Joined: May 14, 2008
    Posts: 3,551

    Beanscoot
    Member

    I ran into a similar issue with a small block setup. I was able to avoid using a spacer at all by cutting a heavy chamfer on the pilot bearing, so the input shaft splines could go a bit more forward. I only have half as much contact between the bushing and input shaft pilot, but figured this is okay since there is very little side thrust .

    Another issue is that the splines may nut be cut far enough backwards to allow the clutch disc to "move backwards".
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.