Register now to get rid of these ads!

Technical Front Brake Hub Offset

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by seb fontana, Apr 30, 2025.

  1. seb fontana
    Joined: Sep 1, 2005
    Posts: 9,114

    seb fontana
    Member
    from ct

    Sometime in the past I put F1 [51'] brakes on passenger car [48'] square back spindles. I am thinking that since the F1 brakes are wider there would be a slight tread width increase? Any one remember how much?
     
  2. About a 1/16" difference to the hub face.

    40.JPG

    f-1.JPG
     
    Ned Ludd, gimpyshotrods, Andy and 2 others like this.
  3. seb fontana
    Joined: Sep 1, 2005
    Posts: 9,114

    seb fontana
    Member
    from ct

    Perfect, thank you. I do not have the drum and backing plate off, my measuring is from wheel face on the drum to spot face on axle side of spindle so is rough; I get a little over the F1 dimension in pic by around .075. The disc brake rotor [speedway kit 91031909] I have is less than the 40' ford pic dimension by quite a bit. What I need to achieve is that the wheel ends up in the same place as with the F1 drums, to clear drag link tie rod end which is pretty much tucked where a standard clip on wheel weight would go. Seems I have to add about .400 to rotor face.
     
  4. Here are a couple measurements of a F-150 rotor (Speedway kit) mocked up on a spindle.

    The first is wheel mount surface to back of rotor and the second is back of rotor to spindle flange.

    The second has to be subtracted as the rear face of the rotor is behind (inside) the spindle flange.

    Puts the wheel mount surface at about 3-1/8" which would be about 3/16" narrower than an F-1 hub and drum.

    Didn't have any problem with tie rod clearance on the installs. On one install the arms were bent for drop axle swing; but the eyes remained at stock width. The other we used CE bolt on arms in our own way.

    Maybe this will help with project?



    wms to back of disc (Medium).jpg

    back of disc to face of spindle flange 1 (Medium).jpg

    front end - Copy (Medium).jpeg
     
  5. seb fontana
    Joined: Sep 1, 2005
    Posts: 9,114

    seb fontana
    Member
    from ct

    I just went back and forth from your pics to my assembly and the dimensions are the same. So a 3/16 spacer should put the wheel in same off set as F1; and the wheels are just hitting the calipers [because they are reversed] so should give the necessary wheel clearance. Couple pics to show why wheel placement important. Thank you very much! 20250502_145248.jpg 20250502_145229.jpg 20250429_160445.jpg 20250429_160510.jpg
     
  6. I see you have a different steering arm configuration that changed things; the stuff we did used retained the rear drag link connection.

    There were a couple "lumps' on the GM calipers that kissed the wheel; but a little grinding provided adequate clearance.

    Looks like you have it under control.
     
  7. seb fontana
    Joined: Sep 1, 2005
    Posts: 9,114

    seb fontana
    Member
    from ct

    Thanks for the help!
     
  8. Dave G in Gansevoort
    Joined: Mar 28, 2019
    Posts: 3,512

    Dave G in Gansevoort
    Member
    from Upstate NY

    That is one impressive steering arm. Are there some pictures?
     
  9. seb fontana
    Joined: Sep 1, 2005
    Posts: 9,114

    seb fontana
    Member
    from ct

    Old theory of mine; when in doubt, make it stout. I'll see what I can do for some pics.
     
    X-cpe and Dave G in Gansevoort like this.
  10. seb fontana
    Joined: Sep 1, 2005
    Posts: 9,114

    seb fontana
    Member
    from ct

    Here is a couple three, I don't want to get off post too far.. Thanks for interest. 20250505_194950.jpg 20250505_195136.jpg 20250505_195243.jpg
     
    winduptoy and brading like this.
  11. Dave G in Gansevoort
    Joined: Mar 28, 2019
    Posts: 3,512

    Dave G in Gansevoort
    Member
    from Upstate NY

  12. seb fontana
    Joined: Sep 1, 2005
    Posts: 9,114

    seb fontana
    Member
    from ct

    Update: For what ever reason my disc brake rotors are 3/8 less tread width per side than the F1 drums. I measured up side down and backwards and came up with the 3/8 [+/- .010] per side. Ok all set add .375 to rotor face and we are set no clearance issue with steering arm. Of course now can only turn about half way to full lock as Caliper hits the shock... Damn it. I can move the shocks but too much work to do this time of year... Double Damn.. I guess I will put new brake cylinders and keep the F1 drum brakes. I expected the old [new about 1990] wheel cyl to be pretty mucked up but I was surprised how bad they were, really bad!. So now I have to check the rear wheel cyl's, they maybe from 1969? I don't know how Vise grip can be that brave.
     
  13. TCTND
    Joined: Dec 27, 2019
    Posts: 714

    TCTND
    Member

    Looks like you are setting it up for proper Ackerman with a front tie rod. Is that the reason?
     
  14. Looks like the steering arm would not let put he calipers on the front where they would clear the shocks.
     
    seb fontana likes this.
  15. seb fontana
    Joined: Sep 1, 2005
    Posts: 9,114

    seb fontana
    Member
    from ct

    Rich, yes and not lose equal lock to lock steering.
     
  16. seb fontana
    Joined: Sep 1, 2005
    Posts: 9,114

    seb fontana
    Member
    from ct

    It is a cross steer set up and I didn't want to move the steering arm for the drag link and up-set the equal lock to lock that I developed years ago. Pics post #10.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.