Register now to get rid of these ads!

Has anyone used a "double C-channel" deuce frame?....

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by Just Gary, Jan 3, 2014.

  1. 66tintop
    Joined: Nov 7, 2012
    Posts: 450

    66tintop
    Member
    from Canada

    Double c channel frames, I'd use it in a heartbeat ! As far as safety and crumple zones , I don't think many hotrods or any could survive a head on crash at 50 plus mph, I wouldn't even want to see the carnage , it would be fugly !
     
  2. Rick Barakat
    Joined: Aug 12, 2005
    Posts: 932

    Rick Barakat
    Member

    If you think about it, Henry Ford had flex in his early cars because the dirt roads were so bad. A rigid frame and ch***is would have been unbearable on a dirt road. That's why a Model T rides so well on modern pavement. My owners manual for my 1907 Maxwell boasts about the flex in the frame as a driving plus.

    Bottom line, Henry Ford cared about comfort not crumple!

    If you want it, buy it!
     
  3. luke13
    Joined: Oct 25, 2013
    Posts: 381

    luke13
    Member

    this has been my thought as well, just make sure you dont hit another hotrod, or brick wall. part of driving an old car is dealing with the terrors ***ociated with it.
     
  4. Atwater Mike
    Joined: May 31, 2002
    Posts: 11,618

    Atwater Mike
    Member

    An unlearned 'know-it-all' had a pair of OT front fenders ('80s Chev) and was about to cut the crumple dimples out to repair them...I suggested he leave them alone, they're supposed to be there.
    His answer was predictable. I laughed.
     
  5. upspirate
    Joined: Apr 15, 2012
    Posts: 2,303

    upspirate
    Member

    On a different note,I would wonder about moisture trap between the channels being a zone for rust and corrosion as it wouldn't dry as readily?
     
  6. Yep it's only double strong till it rusts 1/2 way thru
     
  7. luke13
    Joined: Oct 25, 2013
    Posts: 381

    luke13
    Member

    naturally occurring crumple zones, thats ford thinking.
     
  8. luke13
    Joined: Oct 25, 2013
    Posts: 381

    luke13
    Member

    i saw similar with someone welding angle iron over the crumple zones on a chev truck bonnet, (theyre there to stop/minimise decapitation in the event of a frontal)
     
  9. Blue One
    Joined: Feb 6, 2010
    Posts: 11,512

    Blue One
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from Alberta

    In any case if you are looking for safety in an 1932 designed car or even one designed to look like a 32, you are deluding yourself and should look elsewhere for automotive safety.
     
  10. thirtytwo
    Joined: Dec 19, 2003
    Posts: 2,652

    thirtytwo
    Member

    You can make the rails as rigid as you want... Most all of the" flex" you guys are worried about is torsional twist... In which case most the duty falls on the crossmembers ... In most 32 fords you have a little 10 ga. Spring cross then about 3 feet or more before another structural member... I say anything more than standard boxing procedure is overkill and adding weight for no reason... Those things are seriously heavy!... Also a lot of those frames are 1 1/2" longer I believe

    Unless its super cheap I'd go with kiwi konnection or a p&jakes if you want the store bought route
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.