Register now to get rid of these ads!

Technical help me id this banjo rear end

Discussion in 'Traditional Hot Rods' started by azratrod, Dec 19, 2013.

  1. azratrod
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 216

    azratrod
    Member
    from Az

    is this a early ('35-41) or late ('42-48) 40's era ford banjo rear end? I know the older ones are slightly wider. I just don't have a reference to go by. thanks

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
  2. Carter
    Joined: Mar 18, 2006
    Posts: 1,531

    Carter
    Member

    Looks like a 42-48.

    Posted using the Full Custom H.A.M.B. App!
     
  3. kb cookout
    Joined: Dec 17, 2004
    Posts: 5,641

    kb cookout
    Member

    1942 -48 has the short radius rods like this one

    later kb
     
  4. aonemarine
    Joined: Nov 2, 2013
    Posts: 500

    aonemarine
    Member
    from Delaware

    Thought the older ones were narrower..
     
  5. olskool34
    Joined: Jun 28, 2006
    Posts: 2,624

    olskool34
    Member

    The shock mounts tell me later like said above.
     
  6. TERPU
    Joined: Jan 2, 2004
    Posts: 2,439

    TERPU
    Member

    Yep '48 shock mounts. Don't throw them away.
     
  7. pasadenahotrod
    Joined: Feb 13, 2007
    Posts: 11,775

    pasadenahotrod
    Member
    from Texas

    The shock mounts will fit any rearend, but this IS a 42-48 rearend as evidenced by the short radius rods, and the rear Panhard bar mount on the drivers side spring mount.

    The earlier rearends do not have Panhard bars as the sprngs are mounted in tension as they were since 1909. The 42-48 rears had rubber bushed spring shackles and the springs were not under tension to give a softer ride to compete with the dual spring more modern GM and Mopar cars.
     
  8. azratrod
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 216

    azratrod
    Member
    from Az

    Thanks for the help guys!
     
  9. 3wLarry
    Joined: Mar 11, 2005
    Posts: 12,804

    3wLarry
    Member Emeritus
    from Owasso, Ok

    measure the distance between the back side of the backing plate to the other side...'35-'41 is 51" and '42-'48 is 53"... btw, those backing plates are '39-'41.
     
    kidcampbell71 likes this.
  10. Randy P
    Joined: Oct 3, 2006
    Posts: 437

    Randy P
    Member
    from Austin, TX

    I zoomed in on the picture and it looks like it has the little "spike" that points down from the outside edge of the spring hanger. That little spike is commonly considered 1941 only. However, I bought a rear once that had the spike, assuming it was 1941, but upon getting it home and measuring it found that it was the width of 1942-48. It also had the short radius rods. So, apparently Ford used up some of the "1941" ends on the new, wider 1942-48 axle housings. It's going to come down to the overall width or the length of the axle housings. In addition to the helpful information that has already been provided, this is a very helpful article:

    http://www.flatheadv8.org/fordrear.htm
     
  11. azratrod
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 216

    azratrod
    Member
    from Az

    I measured from backing plate to backing plate and it measured 51.00"-51.50". depending on if it was off the backing plate or the backing plates lip.

    but I thought the '42-'48 radius arms were the shorter ones versus the '35-'41?
     
  12. Cowtown Speed Shop
    Joined: Sep 26, 2010
    Posts: 1,195

    Cowtown Speed Shop
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from KC

    35-40 radius rods are the longer ones, And what skidmarks says is right, That is a 41 axle,......
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.