Register now to get rid of these ads!

Help needed to identify this sbc head

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by CLSSY56, Jan 11, 2006.

  1. CLSSY56
    Joined: Dec 19, 2002
    Posts: 1,218

    CLSSY56
    Member

    I need some help guys. I'm have a heck of a time figuring out what this head is.

    [​IMG]

    but more importantly, what is a single hump designate?
    [​IMG]
     
  2. SinisterCustom
    Joined: Feb 18, 2004
    Posts: 8,273

    SinisterCustom
    Member

    Just type in "chevy cylinder head casting numbers" in your search engine. I forget the site but there are a few that have all the info you need.

    Josh
     
  3. Hackerbilt
    Joined: Aug 13, 2001
    Posts: 6,250

    Hackerbilt
    Member

    3837064? (bit dark on my screen...)

    56-62 265-283
     
  4. ProEnfo
    Joined: Sep 28, 2005
    Posts: 1,498

    ProEnfo
    Member
    from Motown

    http://www.ecbrcnj.com/id14.html

    cc
     
  5. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 60,335

    squirrel
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    it's Canadian. They do wierd things up there, the cold gets to them.....
     
  6. CLSSY56
    Joined: Dec 19, 2002
    Posts: 1,218

    CLSSY56
    Member

    I know it's a 265 head 56-62 and it has a date of 1963, but what does the single hump designate?
     
  7. 302GMC
    Joined: Dec 15, 2005
    Posts: 8,554

    302GMC
    Member
    from Idaho

    Cars & Parts Chevrolet V8 casting # book shows '55 - '56 265 p***. standard perf. & '55 -' 56 truck ...
    302
     
  8. oldkid
    Joined: Jan 16, 2005
    Posts: 163

    oldkid
    Member
    from smyrna tn

    go to motec(google it). i believe they're right about 99.9% of the time.
    265's were 55/56 only.
     
  9. CLSSY56
    Joined: Dec 19, 2002
    Posts: 1,218

    CLSSY56
    Member

    and 1957
     
  10. oldkid
    Joined: Jan 16, 2005
    Posts: 163

    oldkid
    Member
    from smyrna tn

    izzat 57 canadienne eh? or 57 u.s.??
     
  11. Powerpro Series "Chevrolet Small-Block V-8 ID Guide" lists 3837064 as being '56 265 head with 1.72 intakes and 1.5 exhausts. The number 63 visible leads you to think that to be a date, although G.M. used a code showing month(usually a letter), day, and the last digit of the year, and not right under the casting #, of co**** anything is possible! Look at the bolt holes for the valve cover, are they directly above one-another? If so, they are post '58, earlier heads had staggered holes, hence the extra holes in the gaskets! It's my guess that the single hump don't mean much.---------------LEE
     
  12. Hackerbilt
    Joined: Aug 13, 2001
    Posts: 6,250

    Hackerbilt
    Member

    Wouldn't it simply mean its the 3738064 head casting!?!?

    If I'm not mistaken, even the double hump performance castings used different shapes of double humps to identify the various castings without reading the numbers.
    MIGHT have been for the ***embly line ID of the heads...

    Are you asking if that single hump shape signifies some sort of performance head?

    (Why am I suddenly humming "My Humps"?)
     
  13. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 60,335

    squirrel
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    must be something to do with the camels they grow up north?
     
  14. CLSSY56
    Joined: Dec 19, 2002
    Posts: 1,218

    CLSSY56
    Member

    I've read a few places that it's a power pak head, but most don't say either way, nor any perticular info.
     
  15. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 60,335

    squirrel
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    If you would show us a picture of the combustion chamber, maybe we could compare it to how a power pack head looks, and let you know? That's really about the only major difference between the early heads, aside from the real early 265 heads with the tiny ports.

    so far we've been able to determine 3 things about the head:

    1. Nobody has seen a single hump before

    2. It's Canadian.

    3. The casting numbers shows up as an early head used for several years on 265-283 engines.
     
  16. chromedRAT
    Joined: Mar 5, 2002
    Posts: 1,737

    chromedRAT
    Member

    what's the possibility of it bing a 265 made after they were phased out as a replacement engine for a warranty or parts program?? just wondering. i've got a set of those heads, and i THINK they were original to my 68 327. it wasn't the hi-po engine, but the 275-285 or whatever hp version.
     
  17. CLSSY56
    Joined: Dec 19, 2002
    Posts: 1,218

    CLSSY56
    Member


    The block is for a 56, but with a cast of 1960 (no it's not the good block for early '57 with starter mounts). The heads are 56-62 265/283 cast in 1963... ya it's a replacement. All the numbers jive, was told it was a power pak... just was trying to make sure... although it really doesn't matter. If the heads are PP I'd keep them on there... or may go to 305 heads, dunno yet.
     
  18. Thumper
    Joined: Mar 7, 2005
    Posts: 1,610

    Thumper
    Member

  19. overspray
    Joined: Jan 14, 2003
    Posts: 1,454

    overspray
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    I've seen that casting mark before but I didn't look at the date. I'm pretty sure it's the same as a power-pak with the "point" marking. If I remember the valves and combustion chambers were the same as power-pak.

    overspray
     
  20. Scott B
    Joined: Dec 31, 2002
    Posts: 549

    Scott B
    Member
    from Colorado?

    See, the trouble with those casting numbers is that they are French Canadian. You have to translate them into French to be able to figure out what they mean.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.