Register now to get rid of these ads!

Projects Help With Coil Overs

Discussion in 'Traditional Customs' started by Mark Jenny, Dec 31, 2016.

  1. Mark Jenny
    Joined: Oct 23, 2014
    Posts: 821

    Mark Jenny
    Member

    I bought a 28 Ford Sedan a few months back, and the coil overs arent doin the job...the springs are too weak, and relax to far with weight on them, thus no shock travel,thus crappy ride...so...I went hunting for a set of springs at the popular sites, but I cant seem to find a set rated at 225-250 lbs with the same diameters so that the buckets/mounts will work....these are 2 7/8" OD and 2 1/4" ID...cant seem to find a set that size...everything is bigger OD....can anybody lead me to the right source for these?..or...a new complete set with the same type of mounts so that I can use existing.,..thanks for the help guys... IMG_0281.JPG IMG_0282.JPG IMG_0283.JPG body mounts...heres some pics of what I have now...most all the kits dont have this type of top mount where the shocks are just threaded
     
  2. TerrytheK
    Joined: Sep 12, 2004
    Posts: 1,564

    TerrytheK
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Almost looks to me like they're regular shock/helper/overload type springs and someone made their own mounting system?? If that's the case I can see why they're not holding up the load.
    Maybe some pics of the chassis and rear axle mounts might give someone a better idea what you're working with? Sorry, not much help but at least it's a bump for you.
     
    Pocket Nick likes this.
  3. As said,, that's homemade add on helper spring stuff,,,,
     
  4. I posted this in your other thread:

     
  5. Mark Jenny
    Joined: Oct 23, 2014
    Posts: 821

    Mark Jenny
    Member

    If I could just find this spring in a 225-250 lb rating..thats really all I need..these springs are just too relaxed..must be 150's
     
  6. Mark Jenny
    Joined: Oct 23, 2014
    Posts: 821

    Mark Jenny
    Member

  7. Kerrynzl
    Joined: Jun 20, 2010
    Posts: 3,557

    Kerrynzl
    Member

    What is the spring rating of the coils you already have?
    And what angle do the coilovers sit at?

    And what is the weight of the vehicle? [corner weights would be better]
    And what is the unsprung weight of the corners [with the car on stands and the springs removed]

    Get [borrow, hire, buy, or steal] some scales
    Answer these and I can help you [without the need for randomly buying a shitload of springs]

    250 lb springs mounted vertically directly to an axle would be quite stiff [too stiff]
    most road cars have a "wheel rate" under 200lb/in in the front.
    To support 800lbs "sprung weight" on the front corner with a 175lb/in wheel rate needs 4-1/2" of spring load which is why manufacturers use heavy wire larger diameter coils [to prevent coil bind]
    This explains the need for a spring compressor to preload them.

    [800lbs is the approx. sprung weight each side on the front of a 70's Aussie V8 Falcon]

    the problem you have is the soft coils are too short for the load on them [assuming the coil rate is OK]
    Being tightly wound, they will bind easily.
    Race coil springs are stiffer and shorter, but they fall out of their spring lands under full droop
     
    Just Gary likes this.
  8. Mark Jenny
    Joined: Oct 23, 2014
    Posts: 821

    Mark Jenny
    Member

    I'm talking Rear coils here, not front coils..guess I shoulda made that more clear...its a 28 ford sedan..most guys are runnin 225-250 lb coils
     
  9. Those are not real coil overs, they look like regular tube shocks with helper springs that supplement and already existing suspension set up. The stud on the shocks is nowhere near strong enough to be load bearing and can shear off. Nothing about what you have is designed to hold all of the weight of ANY part of the car. throw those into the shit can and buy purpose built coil overs, make new mounts for the new coil overs and you're good to go. Or go back to a spring over axle set up which is even better.
     
    Mark Jenny likes this.
  10. Mark Jenny
    Joined: Oct 23, 2014
    Posts: 821

    Mark Jenny
    Member

    Agreed!!
     
  11. tikiwagon13
    Joined: Feb 23, 2011
    Posts: 373

    tikiwagon13
    Member

    Toss them out and buy a proper coil over setup even if you have to modify the mounts, those are going to fail.
     
    Mark Jenny likes this.
  12. Kerrynzl
    Joined: Jun 20, 2010
    Posts: 3,557

    Kerrynzl
    Member


    If you want your car to be loose through corners do exactly what "Most Guys Do".
    "Loose" can be under braking or acceleration [Go and practice opposite lock driving techniques ,and see if you can master this in traffic]

    Now I'll give you an example.
    A 1968-69 Camaro mono-leaf rear spring is only rated at 125lb/in
    So if it weighed 3500lbs with a Fr /Rr weight bias of 55% Fr and 45% Rear, the rear would weigh 1575lbs.
    Now subtract approx. 250lbs for the rear end assembly it would net 1325lbs sprung weight [662.5lbs per spring]

    If you plonked 662.5lbs onto a 125 lb/in spring it would settle 5.3" [5" is the average spring load for a comfortable street car]
    Most cars need to be jacked up 4-5" before a wheel leaves the ground.

    You'll need approx. 115 lb/in wheel rate on a 2800lb model A with 50/50 weight bias.
    If the springs are laid over 20 degrees it would have a motion ration of approx 0.88 so you would need coils with 148.5 lb/in stiffness and 4.4" of spring load to get 5" of load at the wheel

    If the springs are laid over 30 degrees it would have a motion ration of approx 0.75 so you would need coils with 202 lb/in stiffness and 3.75" of spring load to get 5" of load at the wheel

    So when you are shopping for springs you need to consider the length [for coils] or arch [for leafs]
     
    Just Gary, clunker and Mark Jenny like this.
  13. 102_6151.jpg They look very similar to my old Chassis Engineering "economy coil over kit" not a helper spring over a shock. Mine were for a G body and worked pretty good on my Henry J. 000_0017.jpg
     
  14. PoRodder
    Joined: Sep 28, 2014
    Posts: 91

    PoRodder
    Member
    from St. Louis

    Is this traditional?
     
    hrm2k likes this.
  15. Kerrynzl
    Joined: Jun 20, 2010
    Posts: 3,557

    Kerrynzl
    Member

    Yep!
    You can't get more traditional than having "hack jobbed" and mismatched parts on a project.

    My previous post above [that actually used thought and mathematics] is non-traditional
     
    Last edited: Jan 3, 2017
    Just Gary likes this.

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.