Register now to get rid of these ads!

Technical Help with old piston I.D.

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by bchctybob, May 9, 2024.

  1. bchctybob
    Joined: Sep 18, 2011
    Posts: 5,768

    bchctybob
    Member

    Rummaging around in the stuff left in the old garage at my house in LA, I ran across a box marked, “303 Olds blower pistons”. They came with a stash of early Olds stuff that I got years ago. They are used but in good shape, put away dirty. They do have a number on the top. L2074, and some other chicken scratches. They have what appear to be heavy duty pins and the top rings look like chrome rings. I don’t have anything to accurately measure with but they appear to be 3.85 in diameter. My Googling didn’t find anything that looked right.
    IMG_5901.jpeg IMG_5902.jpeg IMG_5904.jpeg
     
    Algoma56 and Deuces like this.
  2. Check with "Ross Pistons" in El Segundo, Ca they'll know.
     
  3. Decades ago, all TRW pistons had L in the part number. From the bottom, it does appear to be a forging. I have old catalogs that list the 303 as 3.75 bore and the 324 as 3.875. There is no piston listing in either of them.
     
    Algoma56, Deuces, Bob Lowry and 2 others like this.
  4. bchctybob
    Joined: Sep 18, 2011
    Posts: 5,768

    bchctybob
    Member

    Thanks for looking. I’m going to clean them up and list them for sale. I was just hoping someone with old catalogs might find a listing. At 3.850, they would be for a 0.100” over 303, strange. You’d think they would go 0.125 over and use 324 pistons. Oh well. I’ll clean them up and inspect them then send them down the road.
     
    Deuces likes this.
  5. Fordors
    Joined: Sep 22, 2016
    Posts: 6,294

    Fordors
    Member

    Bob, I had a very early set of TRW’s in a 301 that I built, seems like I bought them 1966. They were 12 1/2 to 1 but what was really unique about them was the crown was fully machined, crown, dome and valve notches. In appearance they looked a lot like the forging your Olds pistons have, but on my TRW’s there were three, or maybe two?, ribs inside the slipper skirt as seen in this marked photo.

    IMG_0934.jpeg
    I’m not suggesting your pistons are TRW’s but could some other manufacturer have used the same forged blanks?

    To clarify, here’s a forged crown typical of the later TRW’s.


    IMG_0935.jpeg
     
    Last edited: May 9, 2024
    bchctybob, Algoma56 and Deuces like this.
  6. bchctybob
    Joined: Sep 18, 2011
    Posts: 5,768

    bchctybob
    Member

    I noticed the lack of the ribs on the skirts too. But they are full skirts as compared to a real modern race piston. They are also very light and top heavy.
    Just some interesting old parts. Hopefully none of them are damaged, they might be useful to someone.
     
    Algoma56 likes this.
  7. Ericnova72
    Joined: May 1, 2007
    Posts: 670

    Ericnova72
    Member
    from Michigan

    From what I recall, weren't the skirt ribs a later upgrade after TRW found some engine applications had problems with skirt tab breakage and so some designs got upgraded??
    It was a problem for the first couple years of SBC LT-1 350 OEM forged pistons that Chevy originally spec'd TRW to make. TRW added the skirt ribs on the aftermarket replacement versions and made the production change on OEM's as well.

    Other engines may have never needed them.
     
    Deuces, Algoma56 and bchctybob like this.
  8. saltracer219
    Joined: Sep 23, 2006
    Posts: 1,164

    saltracer219
    Member

    Those are some old TRW Power Forged stock relacement pistons. My old catalogs do not go back that far however I did find that number listed in the spec. chart but it does not specify the application, only the clearance specs. Here is what I have: L2074, power forged, max available o.s. +.060, 3.875 bore, cam J, skirt clearance: .0025 top, .002 bottom. Ok, hope this helps, take care, G.....
     
  9. nrgwizard
    Joined: Aug 18, 2006
    Posts: 3,011

    nrgwizard
    Member
    from Minn. uSA

    Hey, Bob;
    Very possible those pistons were made prior to the 324 coming out, since the 303 was out for a few years prior to the 324. Or other reasons not to go .125 over.
    Marcus...
     
    Deuces and bchctybob like this.
  10. jimmy six
    Joined: Mar 21, 2006
    Posts: 16,691

    jimmy six
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Hopefully there will be a ring set for them…..a problem if it’s not some std plus overbore…
     
    Deuces and bchctybob like this.
  11. nrgwizard
    Joined: Aug 18, 2006
    Posts: 3,011

    nrgwizard
    Member
    from Minn. uSA

    For "odd-sized" rings, look at the metric stuff. Sometimes there's crossover, if the ring thickness n type are acceptable.
    Marcus...
     
    bchctybob and Deuces like this.
  12. bchctybob
    Joined: Sep 18, 2011
    Posts: 5,768

    bchctybob
    Member

    I cleaned up a few of them and then forgot to throw them in the family truckster when leaving LA. So they’ll be sitting on the workbench until I get back down there.
     
  13. saltracer219
    Joined: Sep 23, 2006
    Posts: 1,164

    saltracer219
    Member

    3.875 bore is the same as S.B. Chev 283 so rings should not be any problem.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.