Register now to get rid of these ads!

HEMI Tech - Cooling Systems

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by scootermcrad, Jan 6, 2012.

  1. slayer
    Joined: Jun 5, 2005
    Posts: 2,069

    slayer
    Member

    Just an FYI, the block pictured above is not actually a Chrysler casting. That is one of the New blocks Gene Adams was involved in developing. The large support ribs in the valley are the dead give away.
     
    gimpyshotrods and George like this.
  2. 73RR
    Joined: Jan 29, 2007
    Posts: 7,342

    73RR
    Member

    If that is a new casting ya gotta wonder why Gene included the casting marks around the valley....:cool: Seems like a frivolous detail that could be used as a deception.
    As for the coolant holes, what has Gene found in his research that would lead him to that particular pattern as opposed to duplicating MaMopar?
    I looked at a dozen blocks and, as gimpy says, all appear the same with the holes at the rear. The exception is the 51-53.
    With all of this head-scratching I'm just about bald....:eek:
     
    gimpyshotrods and slayer like this.
  3. Yes I corrected that though on your prompt, ( thank you) but in another post. We both know what I said the first time didn’t accurately state what I meant to say.
     
  4. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 24,443

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    I just grabbed the first gen-1 picture that came up.

    Searching for "392 Hemi block" gives you a deluge of pictures of the new ones.
     
  5. 31 Coupe
    Joined: Feb 25, 2008
    Posts: 507

    31 Coupe
    Member

    Hello folks.
    Old thread I know but I'm looking for your valued advise on rebuilding a 1955 331 Hemi water pump for a friend down here in Australia.
    The pump arrived fully disassembled, all cleaned up and with a new rebuild kit like in the photo below.
    s-l400.jpg
    I've confirmed that the impeller and fan hub have the desired press fit onto the shaft, the bearing fit into the housing is good and the the carbon seal contact face in the housing is very acceptable.
    My MAIN concern is where the impeller should be positioned inside the pump housing ..... depth/clearances wise.
    I read online that the impeller to housing clearance should be ~0.010" but it didn't mention where the clearance should be set at ...... impeller vane tips to housing or rear cover to impeller?
    If I place the loose impeller into the housing and the impeller vane tips sit on the mating/machined conical housing face there is ~1/8" of space left between the impeller rear face and the rear cover plate.
    Also, the clip that snaps onto the bearing OD through a slot in the housing snout has a large degree positional freedom.
    Consequently I'm a not sure where to position the impeller inside the housing cavity.
    Thanks in advance ..... I'll gratefully appreciate any experienced technical advise.
     
    Last edited: Aug 28, 2025 at 8:18 PM
  6. patsurf
    Joined: Jan 18, 2018
    Posts: 2,315

    patsurf

    prob split the difference would be close!
     
    Just Gary likes this.
  7. George
    Joined: Jan 1, 2005
    Posts: 7,927

    George
    Member

    Gary at Quality Engineered Components, "73RR" here on the Board, should be able to answer your question. If he doesn't weigh in, send him a PM.
     
  8. mlagusis
    Joined: Oct 11, 2009
    Posts: 1,232

    mlagusis
    Member

    Hey guys, I was digging into this thread yesterday, trying to better understand cooling on these old Hemis.

    I have a 1956 354 Hemi I am rebuilding. I am running the hot heads 4 barrel intake and their cross over and chevy water pump. The engine is going in a lowered 56 New Yorker with the goal of driving it a lot.

    Question; do I need to run hoses from the cross over to the back of the heads or can I run the head block off plates and rely on the coolant to run thru the intake?

    Here is the motor in the car before I pulled it out to take to the engine builder. You can see the hoses running to the back of the heads from the cross over
    IMG_6259.JPEG

    This photo shows the back of the engine where you can see the hoses connecting to the back of the heads
    IMG_6273.JPEG

    Can I ditch the hoses and run these block off plates?
    block off plates.jpg
     
  9. patsurf
    Joined: Jan 18, 2018
    Posts: 2,315

    patsurf

    isn't there some benefit getting cooling water back there directly?-maybe just prettier or even 'stealth' plumbing..?
     
  10. George
    Joined: Jan 1, 2005
    Posts: 7,927

    George
    Member

    The back of the heads are normally blocked off from the factory, so yes! block them off!. Those hoses are supposed to go to the heater core. I'd just loop it. The long BB Chevy W/P will fit over the stock timing cover, the OEM 392 crossover bolts right on and you'll have less of a problem with radiator hose/fan interference.
     
  11. patsurf
    Joined: Jan 18, 2018
    Posts: 2,315

    patsurf

    so no benefit to try to cool the back end off 'extra'?
     
  12. George
    Joined: Jan 1, 2005
    Posts: 7,927

    George
    Member

    Might screw up the intended direction of flow. Might be a case of having a temp gun and getting readings of various locations on the block & heads with & without the hoses & seeing if there's any differences. Having them blocked helps with firewall clearance also.
     
    patsurf likes this.
  13. mlagusis
    Joined: Oct 11, 2009
    Posts: 1,232

    mlagusis
    Member

    My brother set this all up 20 some odd years ago. The more I’ve been looking at this, the more these two hoses doesn’t seem to belong. If you look on the crossover just under the thermostat housing, he added a spacer that has these hoses connecting from there to the back of th heads.

    I want to put the block off plates on the back of the heads when this motor goes back together. Just wanted to make sure I was seeing this correctly.
     
  14. mlagusis
    Joined: Oct 11, 2009
    Posts: 1,232

    mlagusis
    Member


    Are the coolant ports on the front and back of the heads so you do not end up with a driver side and passenger side only head?
     
  15. George
    Joined: Jan 1, 2005
    Posts: 7,927

    George
    Member

    Yup!
     
    mlagusis likes this.
  16. patsurf
    Joined: Jan 18, 2018
    Posts: 2,315

    patsurf

    ah!!
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.