Register now to get rid of these ads!

Holley vs Edelbrock vs Barry Grant carbs

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by hdv32, May 23, 2004.

  1. hdv32
    Joined: Jun 25, 2002
    Posts: 110

    hdv32
    Member

    I need a new carb for my car and am looking for opinions on the merits of each. I am running a mild 350 SBC, Edelbrock Performer cam, Edelbrock Performer manifold, and shorty headers. Motor is base 250 hp Chevy crate motor. ****** is 350 with 2400 stall convertor and 3.25 rear. I am considering either Holley 1850 600CFM va***n advance, Edelbrock 600 CFM, or the Barry Grant Street Demon 525 CFM va***n advance. Any thoughts on which would be closer out of the box and the easiest to fine tune after installation. I have heard some good things on Barry Grant's very complete instructions and adjustability.
     
  2. Fat Hack
    Joined: Nov 30, 2002
    Posts: 7,709

    Fat Hack
    Member
    from Detroit

    Go for a Holley...but step up to a basic 750cfm vacuum secondaries version.

    It will feature center hung bowls, dual feed line and will flow enough to feed that relatively mild small block. Put away those outdated "formulas" that say you only need like 400cfm for a 350 engine...that only works on PAPER, not in the "real" world!

    No carb or engine is 100% efficient, so that 750 may well only flow 680cfm on your engine at most....and the bulk of your driving will be done on the primaries, which are half that much!

    You can easily dial in a Holley four barrel with secondary springs and accelerator pump cams to fine tune it to your application, too.

    (I did a big post on this a while back, not running through it again!)

    But, to get you in the ballpark, try the plain secondary spring and the green accelerator pump cam...if your "out of the box" 750 doesn't already have 'em installed!

    You have a small, probably pretty light car with a decent small block, looser converter and auto trans...the 750 oughtta do the job perfectly!!!

    The Edelbrock is a good "bolt it on and drive it" carb, but won't out-perform a well tuned Holley!

    The BG carbs are decent, but pricey...you'll get all you need from a basic Holley 750!

     
  3. JimC
    Joined: Dec 13, 2002
    Posts: 2,243

    JimC
    Member
    from W.C.,Mo.

    I have to agree to disagree with Hack slightly.
    I have used all three.
    My 62 has just a little more output than your 350 and it survives quite well on a 600 Carter(same as Edelbrock), The Holleey is a good option, but i get tired of fixing leaky bowls.
    If money is no problem, definately go with the Grant.
    Your engine will run just fine on the 600 or so.
    It will run on the 780, too and you would have better tuning options.

    remember, the Carter/Edelbrock AFB runs out of the box and only require 3 to 5 lbs fuel pressure.

    I have to admit I am no carbueration expert and the opinions stated are merely based on experience. [​IMG]
     
  4. A-Bomb
    Joined: Jan 19, 2003
    Posts: 309

    A-Bomb
    Member

    just a couple of carb experiences I have had. I once had a 34 pickup with a factory 350 h.p. 327,350 turbo trans,3.23 rear. I bought a new 750 va***m holley. Truck ran o.k. however gas mileage was terrible(14-15 on highway)much less in town. I sold it to a fella with a big block and bought a new 600 holley va***m secondary. Truck ran much better, gas mileage jumped to 18 on highway,exhaust had a "crisper" sound to it. I would buy no more than a 600 if I was just going to want a good street driver that had some punch when I needed it. Just my opinion, Dale
     
  5. Flat Ernie
    Joined: Jun 5, 2002
    Posts: 8,406

    Flat Ernie
    Tech Editor

    Be sure you're comparing apples to apples as well. I believe the Edelbrock/Carter/Weber carbs are rated at a different flow than the Holley, so a 600 Holley <> 600 Edelbrock.

    Holley's have get a bad rap from folks that don't understand how to tune them. Edelbrock tuning is a bit easier with their charts, but the parts are expensive. Most 1850 600 Holleys run great right out of the box on mild engines such as yours.

    I've no experience with the BG carbs, but I do know they're expensive as hell &amp; look like Holleys - so you're getting a fiddled-with Holley from what I can tell. But like I said, I've never run one.

    [​IMG]
     
  6. Fat Hack
    Joined: Nov 30, 2002
    Posts: 7,709

    Fat Hack
    Member
    from Detroit

    I bolted on a stock 600cfm Holley and it ran great on small block Chevy while delivering good fuel economy in everyday driving. If it were strictly a beater, or a daily rat, I'd have suggested the 600 for your application, too.

    But, being a fenderless Vicky with a warmed over small block and mild stall converter, I was suggesting the 750 as a means of squeezing the most performance out of the package. The 600 will work great if mileage is a factor...

    ...but for all out performance, the 750 will beat it...if tuned properly!

    I've run plenty of Carter and Edelbrock carbs, too. They work fine for daily drivers or in dual quad applications where Holleys won't fit easily. They are usually "good enough" for the average weekend cruiser, and dumbed down enough to be nearly foolproof.

    (Really, the only Carter I was ever impressed with was the much hated Thermoquad! [​IMG] [​IMG])

    Tuning a Holley takes a bit of understanding and know-how, but it's no mysterious black art...once you've done it a few times you will come to appreciate the carb's design and performance potential!

    Again, it depends largely on what you want to do with your car. To just make it run and drive, an Edelbrock or Carter will get it there. To make it run slightly better, a Holley 600 will do the job. To make the MOST of your combination, the 750 Holley or one of the BG carbs is the ticket!

    (As an alternative to the standard "cl***ic" Holley design, they made some four barrel carbs some years a go now with removeable tops...no gaskets below the fuel level. I don't know if they still sell these or not, as they were not very well received by the aftermarket parts buying public. They used standard Holley jets and most tuning parts, just in a different configuration. I tried one and loved it on a Ford 302. But, even in "regular" Holley designs, I've never had any leaky fuel bowls. The o-rings on the 600 carb's transfer tubes are prone to tearing during installation, but covering them with a swab of clean axle grease solves that problem!)

     
  7. deuceV8
    Joined: Dec 3, 2002
    Posts: 237

    deuceV8
    Member

    I've never had an edelbrock but I now have a grant and it is a total peice of ****. This is the second one they've sent me and I've had nothing but trouble with it. I called them gave them all of my engine and cam specs and they recommended a 650 speed demon and I've had nothing but problems with it I will never buy from them again. I was told they were sued by Holley and after the law suit was settled theyre product went to **** and I have to say I agree.
     
  8. Fat Hack
    Joined: Nov 30, 2002
    Posts: 7,709

    Fat Hack
    Member
    from Detroit

    Can't beat the ORIGINAL then...go with a Holley! [​IMG]

     
  9. zman
    Joined: Apr 2, 2001
    Posts: 16,790

    zman
    Member
    from Garner, NC

    Don't count out the Quadrajet either. I've had really good results with Edelbrocks and tend to use either them or Quadrajets on the street. Tend to leave the Holley's to the track...
     
  10. AHotRod
    Joined: Jul 27, 2001
    Posts: 12,336

    AHotRod
    Member

    If it were me, I'd put a Q-jet on it. Great gas mileage and power. Oh , and you can find them for $10 bucks.
     
  11. dehudso
    Joined: Sep 25, 2003
    Posts: 545

    dehudso
    Member

    Another vote for the Q-jet. Small primaries give good mileage, while large secondaries give awesome power. They are a bit more complicated than a Carter/Weber/Edelbrock, but I think they would give nice part throttle driveability, and great wide open performance.
     
  12. DIRTYT
    Joined: Oct 22, 2003
    Posts: 3,264

    DIRTYT
    Member
    from Warren,MI

    i vote q jet to. im one of those smucks that cant tune a holley every one ive had has been horrible. ran a 1150 demon on my buick 455 i loved that carb. very easy to tune took well to adjustments and it had the nifty gl*** float adjustment. but nothing beats a good running q-jet. and when u gun it on the free way u get the famous q-jet VAAAAAUMNMMMMMMFFFFFFF!
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.