Register now to get rid of these ads!

Hoop Steering Arm Question

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by poboyross, Apr 4, 2013.

  1. poboyross
    Joined: Apr 29, 2009
    Posts: 2,142

    poboyross
    Member
    from West TN

    I'm using a hoop steering arm for my A build, and I'm also using a cowl steering setup, BMW 2002 box. The build is a 28/29 A highboy coupester. Currently, the hoop is stock from Speedway, and the pitman arm on the box is stock, too. There's about a 7" gap between the lateral height of the bottom of the pitman arm and the hoop on the backing plate. I figured I'd lengthen the pitman arm by 4" or so to make up over half the difference, but I also need to raise the mating point on the hoop. In essesnce I'd be using a dropped steering hoop, just flipped. I've never heated and bent anything like this, and seeing its from Speedway, I have my doubts as to its ability to withstand it. My question is, can I use a dropped steering arm usually meant for the bottom of the backing plate, on the top? The arm on these are pointed towards the back of the car and are meant for a standard cross steering setup; however, I thought I might be able to cut the arm portion off and move it to center of the arc...make sense? I can obviously get forged one, so welding it back shouldn't be a big whoop. I haven't found any stock 3" drop hoops, hence why I'm thinking about this.

    [​IMG]
     
  2. thunderbirdesq
    Joined: Feb 15, 2006
    Posts: 7,091

    thunderbirdesq
    Member

    I'd just get some 1/2" rod, bend up the hoop you need, thread the ends or weld on some 7/16" fine thread bolts, weld in a tapered eye and a gusset and be done.

    I have successfully heated and bent those spedway hoops into shape before, but with how much height you need, I wouldn't bother.

    [​IMG]
     
  3. chaddilac
    Joined: Mar 21, 2006
    Posts: 14,089

    chaddilac
    Member

    If you lengthen the pitman arm it will change the geometry of the length to push the steering hoop.
     
  4. thunderbirdesq
    Joined: Feb 15, 2006
    Posts: 7,091

    thunderbirdesq
    Member


    Whoa.. didn't notice that part! yea adding 4" to a pitman arm is probably going to result in some squirrely steering!
     
  5. poboyross
    Joined: Apr 29, 2009
    Posts: 2,142

    poboyross
    Member
    from West TN


    Well, ***uming the pitman's default position is perpendicular to the ground, wouldn't lengthening the arm only change the amount of rotations on the steering wheel needed to achieve the same amount of turn? I dont really have a choice on lengthening the arm, unfortunately :/

    EDIT: REVERSE that....it would make it "quicker" to steer....too "quick" would likely result in the aforementioned squirreliness....but where's the breaking point in length added to squirreliness resulting? Also just read in the "book" to remember to make the drag link parallel to the bones to avoid bump steer. That should cut off 1-2" of length I thought I'd need.

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Apr 4, 2013
  6. thunderbirdesq
    Joined: Feb 15, 2006
    Posts: 7,091

    thunderbirdesq
    Member

    You're quickening the steering by lengthening the pitman arm, for the same input on the steering wheel, the end of the pitman arm is travelling further when its lengthened, and "in turn" pushing the wheels further. I would start with a taller hoop and see where that gets you before making drastic changes to the pitman arm. The limited suspension travel of an early ford will often allow you to get away with imperfect geometry. Hell they weren't perfect from the factory.
     
  7. Zombie Hot Rod
    Joined: Oct 22, 2006
    Posts: 2,452

    Zombie Hot Rod
    Member
    from New York

    Did you consider remounting the box a bit lower in the cowl? Or is it in the "perfect spot" steering wheel wise?
     
  8. poboyross
    Joined: Apr 29, 2009
    Posts: 2,142

    poboyross
    Member
    from West TN

    Yeah, good idea...I'll try the raised hoop/arm @ the wheel first.

    With the under-the-floor MC/pedal setup, it's kinda at the sweet spot at the moment.
     
  9. Zombie Hot Rod
    Joined: Oct 22, 2006
    Posts: 2,452

    Zombie Hot Rod
    Member
    from New York

    Could always whip up some crazy concoction with some gears, or sprockets and a bike chain that lowers the pitman arm, but keeps the box in the same location. . . then hide it in the cowl, under the kick panel.

    I probably wouldn't do it myself (lol) but it's an idea.

    Or get some 1/2 rod like Andy suggested and do the Rolling Bone style hoop.
     
  10. 26 T Ford RPU
    Joined: Jun 9, 2012
    Posts: 12,729

    26 T Ford RPU
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Can you compared the BMW box to say an F1 box to see how many turns lock to lock and the pittman arm stroke ? there may be a chance you could make it longer. Just an idea. JW
     
  11. poboyross
    Joined: Apr 29, 2009
    Posts: 2,142

    poboyross
    Member
    from West TN

    From what I'm reading here on my break, it's 3.5 turns lock to lock....can't find anything on the stroke.
     
  12. SimonSez
    Joined: Jul 1, 2001
    Posts: 1,671

    SimonSez
    Member

    If you make your new hoop longer than stock it will cancel out some of the added length in the pitman arm.

    Your best bet is to mock it all up and try it out, e.g. clamp an extension onto your pitman arm and make a steering arm out of sheet-metal and try them out with different lengths and bends till you get something that clears everything and has a good ratio.

    As long as the wheels are off the ground you should be able to run the steering box through its full range with the temporary parts.
     
  13. Blue One
    Joined: Feb 6, 2010
    Posts: 11,553

    Blue One
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from Alberta

    Attached Files:

    Last edited: Apr 5, 2013
  14. poboyross
    Joined: Apr 29, 2009
    Posts: 2,142

    poboyross
    Member
    from West TN

  15. NortonG
    Joined: Dec 26, 2003
    Posts: 2,117

    NortonG
    Member Emeritus

    Just because the draglink has a jog in it, it doesn't mean the geometry it fixed.

    Also can you give us a good sideshot of the car so we can all see how far it's off?
     
    Last edited: Apr 5, 2013
  16. Blue One
    Joined: Feb 6, 2010
    Posts: 11,553

    Blue One
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from Alberta

    I don't think there would be any drawbacks at all. As long as the drag link would not twist around when pushed or pulled, and as long as it was made from strong enough tubing to aviod flex.

    The whole point of the jog in the drag link is to avoid screwing up the geometry in the first place !

    If the pitman arm is not lengthened and the steering hoop on the spindle is OK, then all that is needed is a way to make up the difference in the vertical height between the two.

    The jog in the drag link would do it.

    If I'm not mistaken that is what he is trying to solve.
     
  17. poboyross
    Joined: Apr 29, 2009
    Posts: 2,142

    poboyross
    Member
    from West TN

    Indeed, that's what I'm trying to do. Might try this with a raised hoop.
     
  18. NortonG
    Joined: Dec 26, 2003
    Posts: 2,117

    NortonG
    Member Emeritus

    If thats all you're after, why aren't you just running it straight from the pitman arm to the steering arm?

    Moving the steering arm up and/or the pitman arm down will affect your steering geometry.

    I just don't see what you're trying correct.

    Is the piman arm lined up or close to the rear mounting point of the radius rod?

    Is your radius rod and draglink at very different angles that will cause bump steer?
     
  19. poboyross
    Joined: Apr 29, 2009
    Posts: 2,142

    poboyross
    Member
    from West TN

    I have about 7" of discrepancy in height from the bottom of the pitman to the top of the hoop at the moment:

    [​IMG]



    And, so you can at least see the angle of the front bones (don't have a side pic of the driver's side handy):

    [​IMG]
     
  20. NortonG
    Joined: Dec 26, 2003
    Posts: 2,117

    NortonG
    Member Emeritus

    I have about 7" of discrepancy in height from the bottom of the pitman to the top of the hoop at the moment:

    Ok. What angle are your bones running at? Your draglink should be parallel to that, not the ground.
    Your draglink needs to swing in a simular arc as your bones.
     
  21. falcongeorge
    Joined: Aug 26, 2010
    Posts: 18,339

    falcongeorge
    Member
    from BC

    I would bet that the beemer box is quicker than the f1, not slower.
     
  22. NortonG
    Joined: Dec 26, 2003
    Posts: 2,117

    NortonG
    Member Emeritus

    Can I suggest running a string from the pitman arm hole to the steering hoop hole and seeing what your geometry looks like?
     
  23. poboyross
    Joined: Apr 29, 2009
    Posts: 2,142

    poboyross
    Member
    from West TN

    Yep, I'll do that along with figuring out the angle of the bones this evening if possible.
     
  24. Atwater Mike
    Joined: May 31, 2002
    Posts: 11,618

    Atwater Mike
    Member

    It's a little faster, George.

    I've used BMW boxes since the '70s, preference was / is the Bavaria non-power. (bigger box, long secter shaft) I always made a pitman arm from 5/8" plate, new arm 6.5" center to center, and the familiar 'safety-pin' hoop steering arm.

    Little faster, much more drivable than that blasted P&J Mustang with its 4.5" pitman arm and 6 turns lock to lock...LOL
     
  25. NortonG
    Joined: Dec 26, 2003
    Posts: 2,117

    NortonG
    Member Emeritus

    I think you might just find that everything is really close to where it should be already
     
  26. poboyross
    Joined: Apr 29, 2009
    Posts: 2,142

    poboyross
    Member
    from West TN

    So I checked the angles of the bones and the draglink. The pivot point of the bones is about 5-6" behind the center of the pitman arm. The bones are at approx. 7 degrees, the draglink would be at about 15-16 degrees. That doesn't sound good based on what I've read.


    Posted from the TJJ App for iPhone & iPad
     
  27. poboyross
    Joined: Apr 29, 2009
    Posts: 2,142

    poboyross
    Member
    from West TN

    Bump for the day crowd....are those numbers bad juju?


    Posted from the TJJ App for iPhone & iPad
     
  28. 26 T Ford RPU
    Joined: Jun 9, 2012
    Posts: 12,729

    26 T Ford RPU
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Whats needed to get a grasp on this issue is a drivers side pic with the wheel removed and drag link of sorts in place.The angles you mentioned don't sound to good.You will get bump steer with this. As for bending the drag link,this can not help as the centre of the link remains the same. JW
     
  29. NortonG
    Joined: Dec 26, 2003
    Posts: 2,117

    NortonG
    Member Emeritus

    Take your string from the hole in the pitman arm and bring it out to where the steering arm is and bring it up in height until the angles are real close.

    That's how high you need to bend up your steering arm to get things right.

    Not too much work at all really.

    Much like the picture of the bent steering arm earlier in the thread.
     
  30. poboyross
    Joined: Apr 29, 2009
    Posts: 2,142

    poboyross
    Member
    from West TN

    Hey guys, my angle math was right. The draglink is about 15-16 degrees, and the bone is about 6-7. Here's the best pic I could get in the garage....

    ImageUploadedByTJJ1365299236.098752.jpg
    ImageUploadedByTJJ1365299300.352375.jpg ImageUploadedByTJJ1365299343.543336.jpg


    Posted from the TJJ App for iPhone & iPad
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.