Register now to get rid of these ads!

How far to not channel your 49 chev!

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by Kustchops, Sep 26, 2005.

  1. Kustchops
    Joined: Dec 1, 2002
    Posts: 689

    Kustchops
    Member

    Thought I would p*** this along, I channeled my car about five inches, which makes the front wheels have no turning radious at all, and now I got to move the front wheel wells up about three inches or four, so I dont have to drive the streets like a 4x4. On sleds more suspention, less channel. A couple of guys wanted to know what the back of my project looked like, these are old pics, since then I took the trunk area out of my parts car and put larger pieces in place of all those little freakin pie cuts. The 63 corvette tail lights fit the slope pretty good.
     

    Attached Files:

  2. Yo Baby
    Joined: Jul 11, 2004
    Posts: 2,811

    Yo Baby
    Member

    It sure is ***y though:p .Eh;) !
    T.OUT
     
  3. Now you know how Nash Airflyte owners feel every day.
     
  4. oldskool55
    Joined: Apr 10, 2005
    Posts: 712

    oldskool55
    Member
    from socal

    bag it and drive with the front "locked" up
     
  5. ray
    Joined: Jun 25, 2001
    Posts: 3,798

    ray
    Member
    from colorado


    NOOOO!


    raise them wheel openings! i think most cars dropped that low NEED the wheel openings higher for proper asthetics, nevermind being able to turn. the monster garage 54 was a real good example of how bad they can look if not done. if you don't want to go quite so far up with the wheel opening, weld in the lip from an olds or buick, or mid 50's chevy, whatever, they flare out and will buy you additional clearance for the tires. i'm in the middle(one side done) of doin this to this ****box falcon i have, raised em about 2" and you'd be hard pressed to pick it out without a stocker to compare to, but it looks RIGHT, that's what i was going for, not, "hey look, this guy butchered the wheel openings!"
     
  6. FONZI
    Joined: Mar 5, 2001
    Posts: 1,536

    FONZI
    Member

    I almost ran the same tail lights. I like em.

    FONZI
     
  7. oldskool55
    Joined: Apr 10, 2005
    Posts: 712

    oldskool55
    Member
    from socal

    that car was sectioned though and it needed it if these get raised theyll look goofy and theyll have to be lengthened because they are the original size and will be unproportionate.... bagging it will make it more drivable... less unwanted s****eing
     
  8. Tim
    Joined: Mar 2, 2001
    Posts: 20,451

    Tim
    Member
    from KCMO

    i call ******** on them looking "goofy" ive done this before and some of coles car s have this done and it is indeed needed asteticly. its hard to pick out what was done AFTER it was done but you could definatly pic out what NEEDED to be done before
     
  9. oldskool55
    Joined: Apr 10, 2005
    Posts: 712

    oldskool55
    Member
    from socal

    it doesnt need to be done because they are still the stock size...
     
  10. ray
    Joined: Jun 25, 2001
    Posts: 3,798

    ray
    Member
    from colorado

    you don't know what you're talking about. :rolleyes:

    goofy is a car "locked up" to be driveable, be it a chopped,sectioned custom, or a 64 impala. and it'll ride like *** too. goofy is the front fender covering the entire upper whitewall and half the wheel. there is a reason bathtub nash's are ugly ****ing cars! slam any other early 50's ride to the pavement without doing something with the wheel openings and you get the same ugly look. this is the same damn thing wrong with so many of the 60's cars with 20+ wheels, slam the damn car down over the wheels, and spend a few days to rework the wheel openings to properly frame the huge rollers. but then i also build my **** to operate safely and as planned at all heights, from pancaked to locked up, not that mine ever need to be locked up, cause i build the ground clearance in them, much like Kustchops appears to be doing. i put more work into reworking the driveshaft tunnel, ****** mount, frame, oil pan, everydamnthing was more work than than the wheel openings. i can dump the air on the interstate and not bust anything, and still turn the wheel lock to lock. i feel safe going down the road, and i don't give a damn if nobody notices the fact the car even HAS modified suspension, cause it LOOKS RIGHT, not broken, and the fact that the average **** on the street doesn't know why makes it all worthwhile.:) the work in making the fenders right on that 49 is NOTHING compared to the work in the chop and channeling.
     
  11. Hackerbilt
    Joined: Aug 13, 2001
    Posts: 6,250

    Hackerbilt
    Member

    The MG Chevy was sectioned BUT they didn't section the fenders...they just trimmed the bottom, which made the wheel openings too small. Guess they didn't have time to make a full length cut.
    That was the only part of the car I didn't really like.
     
  12. Zodoff
    Joined: Aug 9, 2002
    Posts: 526

    Zodoff
    Member

    I channeled my 51 chev 4 inches.


    Its pretty low.
     
  13. alien_werks
    Joined: Apr 4, 2005
    Posts: 3

    alien_werks
    Member
    from ohio

    no, this is too low!
     

    Attached Files:

  14. alien_werks
    Joined: Apr 4, 2005
    Posts: 3

    alien_werks
    Member
    from ohio

    i laughed when i saw these pics.
     

    Attached Files:

  15. No_Respect
    Joined: Jul 27, 2005
    Posts: 1,180

    No_Respect
    Member
    from So-Cal

    god i think im sick now
     
  16. oldskool55
    Joined: Apr 10, 2005
    Posts: 712

    oldskool55
    Member
    from socal

    if you do youre suspenion right itll ride better than a caddy on air... but whatever i dont care its not my car
     
  17. oldskool55
    Joined: Apr 10, 2005
    Posts: 712

    oldskool55
    Member
    from socal

    now that one needs the wheel arches re worked
     
  18. Kustchops
    Joined: Dec 1, 2002
    Posts: 689

    Kustchops
    Member

    The car is bagged on a 78 chev malibu, I set the ch***is up and did the channel after, it looks cool, and rides good, but I like to cruise low. A two inche channel would have been better, I guess instead of changing all the suspention again, I am gonna cut the front wells about three inches. Words of wisdom on the way low channel, I still have plenty of headroom, but I had to put in a tilt because the stock wheel sat on the seat, the engine is at the hood, and the radiator is way up front, with electric fan. I could have saved a bunch of work with a little less channel, and more suspention.
     

    Attached Files:

  19. oldskool55
    Joined: Apr 10, 2005
    Posts: 712

    oldskool55
    Member
    from socal

    so is that at ride height or aired out?
     
  20. Stone
    Joined: Nov 24, 2003
    Posts: 2,279

    Stone
    Member

    You laughed? I feel like shedding a tear.
     
  21. turning radius? who needs turning radius? just drive it straight all the time!
     
  22. It looks like a crime scene.
     
  23. Kustchops
    Joined: Dec 1, 2002
    Posts: 689

    Kustchops
    Member

    Aired out, it lays a inch off the turf, at ride height, it still needs a football field to do a u turn, I am gonna crash my computer tonight, and if it does not recover, I will be off the net for a while, so if I dont return any email Sorry in advance. I should be driving it to Canby swap meet, with a stupid price on it so I can get in early and lurk, if anyone is around, stop by and take a look. Thanks all James........
     
  24. Boones
    Joined: Mar 4, 2001
    Posts: 9,689

    Boones
    Member
    from Kent, Wa

    Why did you channel it so much. I ***ume you were trying to lay the rockers on the ground. didn't you just sit the frame on the ground and put the body over it and weld new floors in (about 3") so all the way down it will touch or just about touch. If you are going with hydraulics or airbags, is anything more really needed.
     
  25. kennedy
    Joined: Sep 28, 2004
    Posts: 700

    kennedy
    Member
    from TN

    Just go straight all the time ,watch for speed bumbs ,and dead lil critters out their.
     
  26. CG
    Joined: Jul 16, 2005
    Posts: 2,077

    CG
    Member

    maybe post a full side shot of it so someone could photochop the wheel openings for you. should be pretty simple chop. personally i think they look better moved up a bit. gives it more of a tail dropped look. but then again who gives a rip what i think...cool car
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.