Register now to get rid of these ads!

Technical Identify Ford 260 Heads

Discussion in 'Traditional Hot Rods' started by oldfordtin, Jun 2, 2024.

  1. oldfordtin
    Joined: Feb 14, 2012
    Posts: 886

    oldfordtin
    Member

    I'm looking online and I can't find accurate information on what cc heads these are. All the casting charts I found on the internet contradict each other. I think they're the 49.2 let me know if I'm correct please. I'm not looking for opinions I'm looking for facts. 20240602_192357_HDR.jpg 20240602_192359_HDR.jpg 20240602_192357_HDR.jpg 20240602_192359_HDR.jpg 20240602_192404_HDR.jpg Thank you
     

    Attached Files:

  2. greybeard360
    Joined: Feb 28, 2008
    Posts: 2,096

    greybeard360
    Member

    If you want facts, get them cc'd at a machine shop. No telling how far off the castings are, how much the seats or valves have been cut, how far they have been surfaced.
     
    Kevin Ardinger likes this.
  3. seb fontana
    Joined: Sep 1, 2005
    Posts: 9,111

    seb fontana
    Member
    from ct

    Ford Muscle Parts Book says 53cc Min.
     
  4. oldfordtin
    Joined: Feb 14, 2012
    Posts: 886

    oldfordtin
    Member

    As I mentioned online and the Interchange books have information, that's why I'm hoping to find somebody that actually knows about the head and not looking for information online or in a book because I'm not sure which one is correct. Thank you
     

    Attached Files:

  5. oldfordtin
    Joined: Feb 14, 2012
    Posts: 886

    oldfordtin
    Member

    The shape of the combustion chambers are different shapes as far as I know, I just dont know if this is the smaller chamber they considered the kidney bean.
     
  6. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 59,187

    squirrel
    Member

    there's a set of 221 heads on ebay right now, with the smaller chambers, you can see that the ones you're looking at are larger, so they'd be 260, not 221 heads

    221.jpg

    comparison

    compare.jpg
     
    sdluck likes this.
  7. oldfordtin
    Joined: Feb 14, 2012
    Posts: 886

    oldfordtin
    Member

    Are they the smaller chamber? They had the same chamber as the 289
    They look just like the 289 heads that are 53cc, 54cc, do you see my confusion? And if you look at the casting number on the eBay heads they're not 221 or 260 heads more misinformation.
     

    Attached Files:

  8. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 59,187

    squirrel
    Member

    didn't notice that, so yeah, I can see why you're confused!

    the heads you're looking at do have a kidney bean shaped chamber.

    I expect you don't own them yet so you can't cc them? :)
     
  9. oldfordtin
    Joined: Feb 14, 2012
    Posts: 886

    oldfordtin
    Member

    I'm trying to make sure I get the right ones, not turning out to be very easy. Here is another set of C4OE heads that are supposedly 49.2
     

    Attached Files:

  10. Johnboy34
    Joined: Jul 12, 2011
    Posts: 1,645

    Johnboy34
    Member
    from Seattle,Wa

    Found this here, the 45 cc heads were first on C20E 221. Most common are the 49.2 or 54.5. Should be able to tell measuring the intake valve.

    https://www.enginelabs.com/engine-tech/engine/reference-ford-ohv-cylinder-head-casting-numbers/

    Same dash letter differences with C40E


    C3OE – 1963, 289, Windsor small-block, 1.67/1.45 valves, 49.2cc chambers. Hi-Po

    C3OE-A – 1963, 221, Windsor small-block, 1.59/1.39 valves, 45cc chambers

    C3OE-B – 1963, 260, Windsor small-block, 1.59/1.39 valves, 49.2cc chambers

    C3OE-E – 1963, 289, Windsor small-block, 1.67/1.45 valves, 54.5cc chambers, Hi-Po

    C3OE-F – 1963, 289, Windsor small-block, 1.67/1.45 valves, 54.5cc chambers, Hi-Po
     
    Last edited: Jun 3, 2024
  11. flatout51
    Joined: Jul 26, 2006
    Posts: 1,292

    flatout51
    Member

    I have this if ot helps IMG_20240603_170515.jpg
     
    sdluck likes this.
  12. flatout51
    Joined: Jul 26, 2006
    Posts: 1,292

    flatout51
    Member

    Looks like 54.5cc c3OE-B
     
  13. oldfordtin
    Joined: Feb 14, 2012
    Posts: 886

    oldfordtin
    Member

    That helped. Thank you
     
  14. oldfordtin
    Joined: Feb 14, 2012
    Posts: 886

    oldfordtin
    Member

    Thank you but almost all the information that engine lab has listed is incorrect. Thank you though
     
  15. oldfordtin
    Joined: Feb 14, 2012
    Posts: 886

    oldfordtin
    Member

  16. Joe Travers
    Joined: Mar 21, 2021
    Posts: 709

    Joe Travers
    Member
    from Louisiana

    Pat Ganahl lists chamber size from 52.0-55.0 cc, av. around 53. Who knows after 60 years.

    Joe
     
  17. Beanscoot
    Joined: May 14, 2008
    Posts: 3,538

    Beanscoot
    Member

    For others who come across this thread, a very reliable book is "Mustang & Ford Small Block V8" by Bob Mannel. The book is based on his decades of research on physical parts and Ford factory literature.

    That book says that the C3OE B head (1963 260) that's the original subject of this thread is a repeat of the C2OE F head (1962 260), which is claimed to have a combustion chamber volume of 53.0 -56.0 cc.

    upload_2024-6-3_16-37-14.jpeg

    As has been mentioned, it will be reduced by the resurfacing done to the head.
     
  18. flatout51
    Joined: Jul 26, 2006
    Posts: 1,292

    flatout51
    Member

    A local old timer sent me that Pic. It is from his Ford crossover book. I can ask him what bood specifically but might take a few days to get a response.
     
  19. ^^^^ that page is out of Tom Monroe's book "How To Rebuild Ford Small Block Engines". I have a copy. Excellent reference manual of mix and matching heads and blocks to get the CR you want.
     
    Last edited: Jun 5, 2024
    Aaron65 likes this.

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.