Register now to get rid of these ads!

ifs transplant

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by corkym, Feb 11, 2013.

  1. corkym
    Joined: Jul 31, 2009
    Posts: 80

    corkym
    Member
    from utah

    what would be the better IFS to mate to a 1941 ford ton frame, coe.
    trying to use this frame for titling purposes. I would like to end up with 5 lug chev or ford bolt pattern. The steering box to be verticle. Need info from someone who has had hands on experience doing this.

    thanks wallymelton@comcast.net
     
    Last edited: Feb 11, 2013
  2. 53 COE
    Joined: Oct 8, 2011
    Posts: 688

    53 COE
    Member
    from PNW

  3. Mustang II :rolleyes:

    If you want to go 5 lug you are going to have to go with a half ton or car suspension and rear end. Is your drag link or cross steer that is gong to make a difference in what you choose and I do not know if the trucks were drag link or cross steer. My assumption would be drag link.
     
  4. Jethro
    Joined: Mar 5, 2001
    Posts: 1,951

    Jethro
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Gm vans have a steering box that the input shaft is vertical. The problem is the crossmember will be too wide. You can narrow the crossmember to get the right track width but you'll have to narrow the frame also. I'm putting C3500 suspension in a 41 regular cab 3 ton fire truck. The van steering will probably work real nice in a COE.
     
  5. kscarguy
    Joined: Aug 22, 2007
    Posts: 1,611

    kscarguy
    Member

    On the ford COE frame you can use a GM truck front crossmember. HOWEVER - The section of the GM setup that "stands up" to accept the upper control arms are narrower than the ford frame so you will have to knotch the COE frame about 1" on each side. Setting the COE frame on top of the GM crossmember will more than likely also result in the truck setting higher than you will want unless you change the cab mounts. The front section of the GM frame is needed to keep the steering geometry correct and that may negate the VIN number on the COE frame.

    A second option I like is the 87-88 Dakota front suspention. The tract width is good for the COE, the brake rotors are large, it is a front mounted rack and pinion setup so you can rotate the rack to point upwards. The location of the steering column shaft off the rack is great for the COE cab. It has a 5 lug, 4 1/2" bolt circle. The dakota crossmember is wider than the COE frame so instead of knotching the COE frame, you will have to box outwards a bit and that will make it easier to adapt. I am not sure about ride height.

    If you then use a Ford 9" out of a full size LTD, etc, it is 1/2" wider per side than the dakota front end.

    The Mustang II is too narrrow and light duty for the COE.

    Hope this helps.
     
    Last edited: Feb 11, 2013

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.