Register now to get rid of these ads!

in need of tranny help

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by ratrodtaylor26, Oct 3, 2007.

  1. ratrodtaylor26
    Joined: Apr 30, 2007
    Posts: 23

    ratrodtaylor26
    Member
    from Lorain, oh

    hey guys, i appologize for i am a total newbie to building cars and i am working on my first project, and i need help. i have been offered a 4 speep manual tranny out of a 72 chevy pick-up and was wondering if it is possible to hook this up to a 57 283 engine? thanks in advance for any help

    dirt
     
  2. Yo Baby
    Joined: Jul 11, 2004
    Posts: 2,811

    Yo Baby
    Member

    Should be a direct bolt in with the right clutch disc.
     
  3. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 57,931

    squirrel
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    and the right bellhousing, it takes the one with the larger diameter center hole (68-up truck)
     
  4. 18n57
    Joined: Jun 29, 2007
    Posts: 578

    18n57
    Member

    My .02 worth...57 block is not drilled for a starter. The starter mounted directly to the bellhousing,so...........You should check the block to be sure it is in fact a 57. 55,56,57 blocks did not have any engine mount bosses on the side of the block(three 3/8-16 tapped holes in a triangular pattern). If there are no such holes you will need an early bellhousing 55-57, these are not so common, but maybe someone here has one lying around. Those old bellhousings were prone to cracking in the area where the starter mounted. '58 and later sbc's all had starter mounts drilled into the block and just about any bellhousing will join the engine and trans. Good Luck
     
  5. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 57,931

    squirrel
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    some 57 blocks are drilled, since you could get a Turboglide in 57. Also the 68-72 truck bellhousings use the 3 bolt starter, so you could use one of them, no starter holes needed in the block, and it would fit the transmission (unlike a 55-57 bellhousing)
     
  6. Buford
    Joined: Aug 30, 2001
    Posts: 314

    Buford
    Member

    That truck 4 speed is big, heavy and has a "gramma" low gear...OK for a truck, but I wouldn't want it in a car, especially a rod.
    JMHO, happy motoring, Frank
     
  7. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 57,931

    squirrel
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    yeah, that goes without saying...but thanks for saying it! definitely a truck trans, not quite suited for cars.
     
  8. Buford brings up a good point, I think you'd be better off with a '68 up 3-speed, or any other manual for that matter. I've driven those granny 4-speeds in the past and hated them, they are like having a 3-speed because you never use first gear, but it's a really slow clunky shifting 3-speed! Oh, they are strong, though.
     
  9. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 57,931

    squirrel
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    the only good thing about them is that they have that old timey shifter lever.

    oh yeah, the other good thing about them is that they are usually free
     
  10. 1950ChevySuburban
    Joined: Dec 20, 2006
    Posts: 6,185

    1950ChevySuburban
    Member Emeritus
    from Tucson AZ

    Since you're in there, why not a 5 speed? Hell, then you get overdrive!
     
  11. mpls|cafe|racer
    Joined: Jun 18, 2006
    Posts: 1,323

    mpls|cafe|racer
    BANNED

  12. ratrodtaylor26
    Joined: Apr 30, 2007
    Posts: 23

    ratrodtaylor26
    Member
    from Lorain, oh

    not that kinda tranny, haha
     
  13. ratrodtaylor26
    Joined: Apr 30, 2007
    Posts: 23

    ratrodtaylor26
    Member
    from Lorain, oh

    hey i wanna thank everyone for thier help, and i realized today talkng to my broher that the granny gear would not be cool in a rod, so my hunt for the tranny is still on, but i do have alot more knowledge thanks to all your posts, thanks again.

    dirt
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.