Register now to get rid of these ads!

Let's Build a 265 Chevy V8!!!!!

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by JeffreyJames, Nov 9, 2009.

  1. falcongeorge
    Joined: Aug 26, 2010
    Posts: 18,339

    falcongeorge
    Member
    from BC

    Slobber, slobber drool....Are those original 2x4 carbs, or did you get other carbs and modify them? I know the 270 hp carbs have much lighter power piston springs, but that can be dealt with.
     
  2. HEATHEN
    Joined: Nov 22, 2005
    Posts: 8,906

    HEATHEN
    Member
    from SIDNEY, NY

    They look like early '60s 283/327 carbs, due to the low mounted choke assemblies.
     
  3. I haven't run any numbers on anything. The intake itself is suppose to be '59 Vette. The guy I bought it from knows what he's talking about so I don't question that. Will removing the one choke suffice? I don't really care if it is completely "correct." It will be going on a non Vette 283 anyway, most likely.
     
  4. HEATHEN
    Joined: Nov 22, 2005
    Posts: 8,906

    HEATHEN
    Member
    from SIDNEY, NY

    Something you'll want to be mindful of when converting everyday WCFBs for dual quad use is the weighted air valves for the secondaries. The true dual quad carbs had much lighter counterweights, since they only had half the vacuum passing through each carb. Without modifying your weights, the rear barrels may never get any airflow.
     
  5. falcongeorge
    Joined: Aug 26, 2010
    Posts: 18,339

    falcongeorge
    Member
    from BC

    Me either, thats why I asked. And yes, as Heathen says, the counterwieghts are also much heavier. Aside from the power piston spring, counterwieghts, and jetting of course, anything else we need to be thinking about? How about buick carbs? Is the throttle arm the same?
     
  6. HEATHEN
    Joined: Nov 22, 2005
    Posts: 8,906

    HEATHEN
    Member
    from SIDNEY, NY

    All of the Buick WCFBs I've seen had the really small bolt pattern, and wouldn't bolt up to the Chevy intake. Olds went to the larger Chevy sized bolt pattern in '54, but both Buick and Cadillac waited until '57, at which point neither one used WCFBs any more. For what it's worth, I also think the real dual quad carbs had smaller venturis than the singe WCFBs did.
     
  7. falcongeorge
    Joined: Aug 26, 2010
    Posts: 18,339

    falcongeorge
    Member
    from BC

    Thanks again Heathen.
    My learning curve on the WCFB's is going to be pretty steep, I have never played with a set before.
     
  8. falcongeorge
    Joined: Aug 26, 2010
    Posts: 18,339

    falcongeorge
    Member
    from BC

    Cactus, keep me up-dated on how this goes once you get it going. I'd be interested in hearing about any tuning issues re: making thes carbs work.
     
  9. HEATHEN
    Joined: Nov 22, 2005
    Posts: 8,906

    HEATHEN
    Member
    from SIDNEY, NY

    Way back when, Carter made a strip kit for them like they did for the AFBs, but I'm sure that they're tough to find today. I've got a factory dual quad intake, and I'm going to try using a '57 283 carb for the rear and a factory secondary WCFB from a Chrysler product that I was lucky enough to pick up reasonable for the front.
     
  10. HEATHEN
    Joined: Nov 22, 2005
    Posts: 8,906

    HEATHEN
    Member
    from SIDNEY, NY

    By the way, I have seen a kit on Ebay that has all of the jets and metering rods in the correct sizes for the factory dual quad carbs---might be worth the $$$ in the long run.
     
  11. falcongeorge
    Joined: Aug 26, 2010
    Posts: 18,339

    falcongeorge
    Member
    from BC

    I found re-popped throttle linkage and '56/'57 aircleaners on one of the Corvette sites. Good info Heathen. I guess I am on the hunt for a pair of WCFB's now. I figured this system was out of reach ($$), but it is looking like it is do-able.
     
  12. falcongeorge
    Joined: Aug 26, 2010
    Posts: 18,339

    falcongeorge
    Member
    from BC

    So bottom line here, I am hunting for chevy, mopar or '54-'57 Olds WCFB's, Preferably fifties models with the high choke thermostat housing? I am guessing the throttle arm on the Mopar versions is different, which would make using the re-pop corvette linkage difficult?
     
  13. HEATHEN
    Joined: Nov 22, 2005
    Posts: 8,906

    HEATHEN
    Member
    from SIDNEY, NY

    Assuming we're just going with choke on air horn style WCFBS, you've got:


    '55-'58 Chevy
    '54-'55 Olds
    '55-? Studebaker (don't know when they went with lower choke, but they used WCFBs through '62)
    '55-'56 Pontiac
    '55-'56 Packard
    '56-'61 Mopar (Chrysler hemis used a WCFB with vacuum secondaries, but Dodge and Plymouth were mechanical like the Chevy carbs)

    Nothing's got a Chevy style throttle arm except a Chevy, although the early Corvette specialists sold repro primary throttle shaft/arm assemblies the last I knew.
     
  14. falcongeorge
    Joined: Aug 26, 2010
    Posts: 18,339

    falcongeorge
    Member
    from BC

    Excellent. I will check on the repro primary throttle arms. Almost wondering if this part of the thread should go into the tech section. A lot of good info here. Now all I gotta do is find an intake.:rolleyes:

    Your right heathen,Danchuk makes a whack of stuff for this set-up, including new throttle shafts/arms. If a guy works at it, he could put a pretty authentic looking set-up together.
    http://www.danchuk.com/Danchuk1.aspx?Category=1b7fe67f-2dba-4ed7-8ce7-a45f764b955f

    air cleaners,
    http://www.parts123.com/parts123/yb.dll?Parta~PartSort~A2~cadefibx~~~~A10~A1
    For some reason this link doesnt work right. Click on "ar cleaners" on the left, it'll take you there.
    Jetting kits,
    http://www.chucksmithandco.com/?page_id=13
    check out part #2017 on pg 2, 270hp power piston springs.

    Pretty much everything you need to convert the carbs is out there. How far you want to go depends on whether you just want them work right, or if you want it to look right too, but you could piece something together that would look like you just dumped a complete 270HP 283 in your hot rod, until someone actually started checking numbers.
     
    Last edited: Mar 7, 2012
  15. inliner2318
    Joined: May 9, 2008
    Posts: 405

    inliner2318
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from Tyler, TX

    My dads 302 chevy used the 265 block. He used 283 crank and puched the block to 4" (+.125). Camel hump heads too. True vintage SBC.

    Its like a LS2 but from 1962.
     
  16. Shaggy
    Joined: Mar 6, 2003
    Posts: 5,207

    Shaggy
    Member
    from Sultan, WA

    Thats a 1/4" over..... Sure it wasnt a 283 block instead??
     
  17. Johnny Gee
    Joined: Dec 3, 2009
    Posts: 13,729

    Johnny Gee
    Member
    from Downey, Ca

    Chevy made a replacement 265/283 Block, they had a differant casting # than a 265 or 283. The 265 and 283 shared the same stroke and the cranks are interchangeable. So it is a possability.
     
  18. falcongeorge
    Joined: Aug 26, 2010
    Posts: 18,339

    falcongeorge
    Member
    from BC

    One more question for Heathen on the WCFB's. I assume the carbs we are looking for share the rochester 4GC 3 3/4 X 3 7/8 bolt pattern? I am doing a old school auto wrecker crawl in a couple months (its over 200 miles away) will be looking for carbs, among other things.
     
  19. HEATHEN
    Joined: Nov 22, 2005
    Posts: 8,906

    HEATHEN
    Member
    from SIDNEY, NY

    No, the Chevy pattern (and the carbs I listed yesterday) is actually larger. The pattern you listed is the original 4 bbl pattern that the '52-'53 Olds and '52-'56 Cadillac used. I'll give you the measurement later---I don't happen to have a Chevy WCFB on me today.
     
  20. falcongeorge
    Joined: Aug 26, 2010
    Posts: 18,339

    falcongeorge
    Member
    from BC

    Thanks Heathen. I'd be kinda pissed if I drove 250 some-odd miles, and came back with 3-4 useless carbs. Wouldn't be the first time I did something like that. :eek::mad: Course I guess I could always go out and buy a 331 cad to go with the carbs...:rolleyes::D
     
  21. Good stuff here. Thanks Heathen and Falcongeorge.
     
  22. mart3406
    Joined: May 31, 2009
    Posts: 3,055

    mart3406
    Member
    from Canada

    ----------------------
    Now that would be a definite
    solution!:D

    Mart3406
    ===========
     
  23. falcongeorge
    Joined: Aug 26, 2010
    Posts: 18,339

    falcongeorge
    Member
    from BC

    Tell you what, if I run across an early cad motor on this trip, I'll be heading right back up there with a pick-up, carbs or no carbs!
     
  24. mart3406
    Joined: May 31, 2009
    Posts: 3,055

    mart3406
    Member
    from Canada

    Hmm?? Just ta' drive ya' crazy:)D) - if
    you do happen to run across an early
    ohv Cad V8 on your boneyard
    carb-hunting expedition, in '55, '56
    and 57, Cadillac offered a factory
    dual-quad WCFB option too - for
    the Eldorados. So along with finding
    parts for your Chevy dual-quad
    set-up, if you drag a Caddy engine
    home too, you could start trying to
    piece together a factory Cadillac
    dual-quad set-up as well! Back in
    the early-'70's, (you could hardly
    give early-Caddy 'hot-rod' stuff
    away back then!) I bought a
    complete, 1956 factory Caddy
    dual-quad set-up in a boneyard,
    that had just been pulled of a
    running car. I got the whole shooting
    match - everything - the manifold,
    the twin-WCFB carbs, with the
    I.D tags still attached and still
    hooked up and working 'hot-tube'
    choke assemblies, the throttle linkage
    and the triangular 'dual-pot' air-cleaner
    assembly - all for $50! I dragged that
    set-up (Damn, it was heavy!) around to
    one swap-meet after another for nearly
    3 years trying to unload it! I thought
    I was gonna die with it, before I finally,
    very happily, sold it for a $120 to guy
    who had just put a 365 Caddy into a
    '54 Ford pick-up. Nowadays, I've seen
    complete, original set-ups like that sell
    for upwards of 3Gs and sure wish I still
    had it!:D
     
    Last edited: Mar 8, 2012
  25. JeffreyJames
    Joined: Jun 13, 2007
    Posts: 16,628

    JeffreyJames
    Member
    from SUGAR CITY

    I traded it away for a 4 wheeler and two Kalashnikovs. THe 4 wheels runs at least.
     
  26. HEATHEN
    Joined: Nov 22, 2005
    Posts: 8,906

    HEATHEN
    Member
    from SIDNEY, NY

    Okay, the bolt pattern that will fit a factory dual quad intake is roughly 4 1/4 by 5 5/8 center to center. The Rochester 4GCs WILL NOT work on this intake, as the fuel bowls run into each other if you try; it's got to be WCFBs.
     
  27. falcongeorge
    Joined: Aug 26, 2010
    Posts: 18,339

    falcongeorge
    Member
    from BC

    Oh I DEFINATELY wasnt even CONSIDERING running two 4GC's:eek:, was just thinking they were the same bolt pattern. What you have listed there is the same as the early AFB bolt pattern. Seems logical it would carry over when they came out with the newer carb.
     
  28. Chuck Embrey
    Joined: Sep 25, 2011
    Posts: 25

    Chuck Embrey
    Member

    I'm a little late to this thread, but I did build a 265 way back in 1959.

    A good bore size is 1/16 (.0625) or .060 over for 274 cid. I ran 13.0:1 Jahns pistons, but that a little much for modern gas. BTW I never saw a 1956 265 block that didn't have an oil filter boss.

    Most people then were running 1957 FI heads in the late '50s. Mine were ported by Gene Sheldon (Ed Fletchall's cousin).

    A lot of people were using the early Duntov on the street (why not? they were made for street driven Chevys). I first ran a Potvin flat tappet, and later a Brown Roller.

    I used both a Harmon & Collins mag (Moon Front Cover drive) and a W&H Du-Coil (hard to find, but they looked good and worked even better). No reason a 270 HP ignition wouldn't work.

    The first manifokd was an Edelbrock 6 carb (97s) that was replaced by a 270 HP dual WCFB set-up. The difference was night-and-day, with the dual fours we started putting out record setting horsepower.

    SCTA C Street Roadster 1/2 Mile Record and El Mirage Record. The 274 was also in Jerry Kugel's 1940 Ford coupe for a week. We cruised Whirley's and then took it to Pomona for a 115 MPH pass in D/Gas.

    If I were to build a 265 today, I'd use modern parts (AFR aluminum heads, single quad manifold with TBI, hydraulic roller, etc) and would have a street drivable engine that would make more HP than my race engine. YMMV.
     
  29. I built a 283 and it didn't have any balls. I can't imagine what a 265 would be like. They really don't look that different from the outside if dressed properly. I am not sure I would go out of my way to do this.
     
  30. Shaggy
    Joined: Mar 6, 2003
    Posts: 5,207

    Shaggy
    Member
    from Sultan, WA

    Really you just didnt have the stones to turn it high enough, or didnt build it enough, Really the biggest mistake everyone makes with a short stroke motor is not Zinging it up to where it starts pumping good air. Part for part a 283 will over rev a 350 or 383 all to hell because the shorter stroke puts less strain on the rods and crank.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.