Register now to get rid of these ads!

COE Looking for opinions for '47 COE

Discussion in 'Off Topic Hot Rods & Customs' started by Fasttoys, Nov 23, 2013.

  1. Fasttoys
    Joined: May 22, 2012
    Posts: 139

    Fasttoys
    Member

    OK, so I'm playing around with paint. Pick 2 and give reasons please.
    Rob
    [​IMG]
     
  2. I'm partial to a combination of 2, 6 and 8!
    I like the bed on 2, and I like a 4 dr or sleeper like 6 and I like tandems like 8 just because. I am building that combo also.
     
  3. RMR&C
    Joined: Dec 26, 2009
    Posts: 4,934

    RMR&C
    Member
    from NW Montana

    3 and 8, maybe without the tandem wheels.
     
  4. Just had a crazy idea, #7 could be changed a little and made to look like a Brinks truck! Maybe I should go to bed?
     
  5. Eric Q.
    Joined: Jun 1, 2008
    Posts: 2

    Eric Q.
    Member
    from Auburn, WA

    #4, #2. Like the tow truck style beds and standard length cab.
    Thanks for sharing your ideas.
     
  6. Fasttoys
    Joined: May 22, 2012
    Posts: 139

    Fasttoys
    Member

    Yeah, I think I agree on the duels. Saves a ton of work with out them also.
    Rob
    [​IMG]
     
  7. Fasttoys
    Joined: May 22, 2012
    Posts: 139

    Fasttoys
    Member

    OK last try
    Rob[​IMG]
     
  8. C.G
    Joined: May 27, 2013
    Posts: 103

    C.G
    Member
    from AL.

    Number 3 because it's pretty much what I want mine to look like. 8.1 because in 15 minutes it could be converted to 8.2 for a quick "looks" change. I also like the slightly higher bed sides on 4 vs 4.1. If you're going to tow I wouldn't discount the bed on # 2 either. Ok, that wasn't much help but it's my choices in order. Heck, I wouldn't kick any of them out of my garage...
     
  9. I've seen a car hauler built like 7.2, must have been close to 40 feet long. Big wow factor, but not very useful. I also would never build anything with wood on the outside of it, with-in 2 years it starts to look like ****. I know of 2 FTWs, one here on the HAMB.
     
  10. C.G
    Joined: May 27, 2013
    Posts: 103

    C.G
    Member
    from AL.

    Every time I see an FJ Cruiser I think about tossing the body and turning it into a WTF! It would break every hot rod rule, go slow, climb sand dunes, and roll back down the second you turned the least bit sideways to the hill. I actually would love to have a shorty stubby for a grocery getter.
     
  11. HOTFR8
    Joined: Nov 30, 2010
    Posts: 2,075

    HOTFR8
    Member

    I like 7 & 8 simply because they are different. Also 8.2 with fold down sides. You could make them removable or even turn them into ramps to put something on the back if you had to.
     
  12. Fasttoys
    Joined: May 22, 2012
    Posts: 139

    Fasttoys
    Member

    The idea of fold down sides is from China (about time we took something back). About all the trucks here use them, they don't have traditional pick-ups here and the they are used for side loading all the time. As far as setting them up to double as ramps, that's a good idea.
    Rob
     
  13. fordsbyjay
    Joined: Nov 4, 2009
    Posts: 755

    fordsbyjay
    Member
    from Lafayette

    I like the crewcab version.
     
  14. HOTFR8
    Joined: Nov 30, 2010
    Posts: 2,075

    HOTFR8
    Member

    The fold down and removable sides have been popular here with one tonners and mostly made with aluminium trays. Glad you like my ideas. Google Holden one tonner and you should see some trays and get some ideas.

    This may help> http://www.autospeed.com/cms/A_2366/article.html
    as it shows an aluminium tray.
     
  15. iwanaflattie
    Joined: May 14, 2011
    Posts: 4,190

    iwanaflattie
    Member

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.