Register now to get rid of these ads!

Moon tank question

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by babblewon, Sep 29, 2010.

  1. babblewon
    Joined: Aug 19, 2007
    Posts: 202

    babblewon
    Member
    from cali

    Hey guys did a search and couldn't find an answer. Anyway, I'm using a moon style tank on my '27 and it's mounted in the rear just about even with the roll pan. So it's pretty low. The thing I am wondering is if anyone has run hard fuel line, but then used rubber hose for the last 10" or so to get into the bottom port of the tank.
    I'm wondering how it holds up considering the port is at the bottom and if gravity will blow the hose off where it meets up to the hard line.
    Is that ok? I will be using a small amount of rubber hose up front to the fuel pump so I thought it may be the same idea?
    Thanks
     
  2. Jalopy Joker
    Joined: Sep 3, 2006
    Posts: 34,204

    Jalopy Joker
    Member

    post some pics-this is an actual gas tank with fuel gauge sender? -likely best to use AN fittings and electric fuel pump-Summit Racing has what they call Twist-***e Hose, but do not know if for gas.
     

  3. I wouldn't use 10' of rubber line period no matter what kind of a tank I had. Braided steel is good if you need to run a flexable line, but your absolute best bet would be to hard line it all the way back use a highflow elbo if you need to get it to go 90 degrees in a short space.

    I doubt that gravity will blow the line off that's what hose clamps and either hose barbs or a flair on the end of the line is for.

    Just my thoughts on the matter.
     
  4. babblewon
    Joined: Aug 19, 2007
    Posts: 202

    babblewon
    Member
    from cali

    Ya it's a moon fuel tank. I can hard line it all the way, just will be a pain in the ***. Up front it's cool right? I am using a manual pump at the motor and need a little flex there.
     
  5. GassersGarage
    Joined: Jul 1, 2007
    Posts: 4,726

    GassersGarage
    Member

    I've used rubber fuel lines for years without any problems. My '65 Biscayne came with a hard line but the ends were rubber.
     
  6. babblewon
    Joined: Aug 19, 2007
    Posts: 202

    babblewon
    Member
    from cali

    That's why I thought it would be ok. My Cadillac has rubber lines at the front and rear going into the tank. That was from the factory. Hard would be better. I'll just have to put the body on and then finish the lines. Too much guessing right now.
     

  7. Nothing wrong with using rubber or the modern equivelent of it at the ends of the line. I just woulldn't use 10' of rubber line. There is a difference in an isolation joint and a long flex line.
     
  8. studedudeus
    Joined: Jun 11, 2008
    Posts: 141

    studedudeus
    Member

    There is no good reason to use rubber, unless there is a likelyhood of flex between the fuel line and the thing you are connecting to. So at the fuel tank, no good reason at all. Use hard lines, as suggested earlier. At the motor, you need flexibility, but don't scrimp. Spring for the good stuff.

    That's the price you have to pay to be cool.
     
  9. fab32
    Joined: May 14, 2002
    Posts: 13,985

    fab32
    Member Emeritus

    I'd like to see a picture of your installation. Traditionally, Moon tanks are mounted high enough to be self priming to the fuel pump. If your tank is mounted that low is the dicharge fitting in danger of contacting road obstacles. If there is even a remote chance of that happening you had better rethink the mounting location.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.