Register now to get rid of these ads!

Mopar Question

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by rocknrolldaddy, Jul 12, 2013.

  1. rocknrolldaddy
    Joined: Aug 24, 2006
    Posts: 336

    rocknrolldaddy
    Member

    The engine and******* didn't come with any cables.
     
  2. rocknrolldaddy
    Joined: Aug 24, 2006
    Posts: 336

    rocknrolldaddy
    Member

    You're right. It looks like it bolts right up. But an other hamber (73rr) says the line is at the back of the block.

    I got the converter off of the 241. There's one bolt that is such a pain in the**** on the poly. It looks like the converter has to come off to get to it. The open end of the 5/8 wrench goes in fine but, it's so tight, I'm afraid to turn it too hard and strip it.
     
  3. rocknrolldaddy
    Joined: Aug 24, 2006
    Posts: 336

    rocknrolldaddy
    Member

    Has anyone else mated a powerflight trans with a torqueflight bell housing and converter to use with a 318?
     
  4. rocknrolldaddy
    Joined: Aug 24, 2006
    Posts: 336

    rocknrolldaddy
    Member

    Yeah, scratch my last post. It might work, but not in my case. Doing so would cause more issues like relocating the cross member and fabricating a new linkage and shortening the drive shaft, that's just from looking at it, and taking measurements.
     
  5. fstfish66
    Joined: May 28, 2005
    Posts: 376

    fstfish66
    Member
    from eastern pa

    from what im reading,trying to figure out the real problem here,,,, the early poly 318 has an extended crank like the early hemis ?? i have a modern 904******* with lock up convertor,,not a cable shifted trans mated to a 1953 dodge hemi 241 ci,,,it uses a hot heads spacer plate for the trany/extended crank shaft deal,,,,others make the same spacer plate,,,tr waters, hot heads,wilcap,,,
     
  6. George
    Joined: Jan 1, 2005
    Posts: 7,966

    George
    Member

    Yes, 61 & earlier A Polys have the same bell/crank flange as the Hemis. Q.E.C. (73RR) also makes a good 727 adaptor.
     
  7. My two cents. If I remember right the '59 should be one that does not have a park position. Again if I remember right, an adapter can be had to put a '65 trans on your '59 motor. If all this is right. I would try to find a '65 trans and column. This would give you the column shift to look somewhat correct. A park position. And best of all, a slip type transmission yoke.
     
  8. straight axle tom
    Joined: Nov 10, 2008
    Posts: 22

    straight axle tom
    Member

    In 1965 only chrysler used a column shift for the cable shift transmission.If you could find one that might be an option.
     
  9. George
    Joined: Jan 1, 2005
    Posts: 7,966

    George
    Member

    As was just mention, there a number of makers of 392 to S/B 727 adaptors, that's what is needed.
     
  10. fstfish66
    Joined: May 28, 2005
    Posts: 376

    fstfish66
    Member
    from eastern pa

    not sure if you meen chrysler as in mopar as a whole,,,or just the brand chrysler,,,,,,but if so chrysler.dodge and plymouth 1965 automatic transmissions were all cable shifted from the column except for the dodge dart and plymouth barracuda, they had a floor shifter with very small console cable shifted,,,1964 and prior were cable shifted via push*****ons,(very kool) a company called imperial services makes a push *****on shifter adapter to use on a non cable trans 1966 and newer,,,just my .02
     
  11. George
    Joined: Jan 1, 2005
    Posts: 7,966

    George
    Member

    There have been reports of "dificulties" with I.S. recently.
     
  12. 73RR
    Joined: Jan 29, 2007
    Posts: 7,342

    73RR
    Member



    This is a classic example of the abuse of English grammar. Try reading the first post with a simple 'comma' strategically inserted....

    "In 1965 only, chrysler used a..."

    .
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.