Register now to get rid of these ads!

Moser Engineering

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by rcnut223, Dec 29, 2015.

  1. OLDSMAN
    Joined: Jul 20, 2006
    Posts: 2,422

    OLDSMAN
    BANNED

    I can't believe that Moser wouldn't stand up to the plate and fix their screw-up.
     
    Atwater Mike likes this.
  2. bobss396
    Joined: Aug 27, 2008
    Posts: 18,689

    bobss396
    Member

    That just looked so bad, mind boggling they'd let something like that get out.
     
    Atwater Mike and hipster like this.
  3. As Falcon George and others said - get the housing checked as a final step. I can't see any way that the bearing saddles and ends can be in alignment if it had to be welded with that much offset at Moser in the first place. Unless the housing was somehow straightened (and without a bar, don't know how you could tell). Get the brackets on it and have it checked out - if it needs tweaking, they'll do it.

    One last question (and this isn't a poke at yah) - are you confident that your welding skills are sound? When I see somebody dressing welds like that . . . I always get a bit nervous (no offense intended!).
     
    oj likes this.
  4. thirtytwo
    Joined: Dec 19, 2003
    Posts: 2,652

    thirtytwo
    Member

    I don't understand what you guys are freaking out about ? .. If he did it the way I think he did it ...it should be identical to moser set-up with straight tubes

    If the center where the 3rd member bolts to is nailed down to the fixture and both ends are nailed to a rigid fixture the tubes can be completely cut off and put back on ... Whatever between the points nailed down to the fixture is meaningless .... UNLESS it was bent and under tension and put back together... Then yeah... It's probably fucked
     
  5. falcongeorge
    Joined: Aug 26, 2010
    Posts: 18,339

    falcongeorge
    Member
    from BC

    Well my guess is it probably DID spring some when he took it out of the jig, and this is a tight tolerance deal, that's WHY we use a jig registered off the bearing journals in the third member.
    Also thirtytwo, go back and look at my post re: the tolerances you should be looking at for runout on this deal. At .005 max total runout per side, its not a "close enough for horseshoes" type of deal, and eyeballing it isn't going to get you there. As long as he is close-ish at this point, it probably doesn't make much difference, because its going to move more than .005 when he welds the brackets onto the tubes anyway. So it needs to be straightened after the brackets go on anyway.
     
  6. Budget36
    Joined: Nov 29, 2014
    Posts: 15,203

    Budget36
    Member

    Are you all saying if you start with say a coil leafed rear, whack the coil stuff off, the weld pads for leafs on it, the has to be checked?

    Or even relocating the pads?

    I never have, and put many a mile on my stuff...did I get lucky?
     
  7. thirtytwo
    Joined: Dec 19, 2003
    Posts: 2,652

    thirtytwo
    Member

    I have narrowed a few with bar and spuds , straightened one that was worse than this one .... I really respect you george ,but I think .005 is wishful thinking on an 1/8 wall tube hangin out about 2 feet from center section... That kinda reminds me of when I hear " my chassis is square within a 1/32"

    The bushings themselves are probably almost .005 smaller than the bearing hole just for a slip fit to begin with
     
  8. big duece
    Joined: Jul 28, 2008
    Posts: 7,018

    big duece
    Member
    from kansas

    Do you think that they were checked that close when Ford made them on the assembly line? As fast they are going down the assembly line, I am sure there was not a bar and donut jig and tweaked with a dial indicator before installed in each car and truck. There was some forgiveness in those set20 bearings.
     
  9. thirtytwo
    Joined: Dec 19, 2003
    Posts: 2,652

    thirtytwo
    Member

    image.jpg

    The shop I work at now has one of these do-hickies and I think it's a piece of shit and I refuse to use it... I garentee you a rear done with this thing... isn't within .005 , I favor a bar full rearend width an old center section and 4 bushings
     
  10. rcnut223
    Joined: Oct 12, 2006
    Posts: 1,282

    rcnut223
    Member
    from wisconsin

    Guys

    When I cut the rear end loose after welding I was looking for movement or a popping noise ....Nothing

    If it's not right i figure it can be fixed or I can buy a new housing
     
    loudbang likes this.
  11. rcnut223
    Joined: Oct 12, 2006
    Posts: 1,282

    rcnut223
    Member
    from wisconsin

    These rearends are run on dirt tracks all over the us

    I'd bet few are perfectly straight
     
    Heavy Flat Head likes this.
  12. falcongeorge
    Joined: Aug 26, 2010
    Posts: 18,339

    falcongeorge
    Member
    from BC

    No, but then I don't assemble a bottom end the way they did it at Ford either...:rolleyes: Yes, its common to find housings way out, that's why people straighten them...
     
    Last edited: Feb 14, 2016
  13. falcongeorge
    Joined: Aug 26, 2010
    Posts: 18,339

    falcongeorge
    Member
    from BC

    I agree 100% on both counts, total POS, I wouldn't even consider using that. As to the factory ford tolerances versus the way I do it, I can only offer advice based on the tolerances I use when I build one for myself. I don't do it half-assed just because its for someone else. Your mileage may vary...
     
    loudbang likes this.
  14. big duece
    Joined: Jul 28, 2008
    Posts: 7,018

    big duece
    Member
    from kansas

    My point was that the oem ones ran for years, and many miles before us hotrods started refining them even more.
     
  15. Larry T
    Joined: Nov 24, 2004
    Posts: 7,921

    Larry T
    Member

    Chuck Finders :D

    BTW, I try to make everything I work on perfect. 50 years trying and I haven't made it yet.

    chuck finders.jpg
     
    falcongeorge likes this.
  16. Budget36
    Joined: Nov 29, 2014
    Posts: 15,203

    Budget36
    Member

    I guess that was what I was getting at.
     
  17. milwscruffy
    Joined: Aug 29, 2006
    Posts: 4,172

    milwscruffy
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    As long as the splines between the axle and the spiders have some slop, you can get by with more than .005 tolerance.
     
  18. Good advice right here.

    I actually managed to warp one just moving the spring perches from one side to the other once. To this day I don't know how I did that, its not like I haven't moved a bunch of 'em. :oops:
     
    loudbang likes this.
  19. 5window
    Joined: Jan 29, 2005
    Posts: 9,948

    5window
    Member

    Amen to that. But, the important thing is that you keep trying. Me,too. It's not that the imperfect piece is "good enough" it's just that most of the time that's the best I can do.
     
  20. That is why those of us who are 'perfectionists' know that we have to continuously be a critic of our own work and strive to get better . . .
     
    saltflats, loudbang and falcongeorge like this.
  21. Larry T
    Joined: Nov 24, 2004
    Posts: 7,921

    Larry T
    Member


    I'm gonna bet that Ford built the rear end housing on a multi million dollar jig that had expansion and shrinkage factored in to the final product.

    What happened after they left the factory is a whole different batch of worms.
     
    loudbang, falcongeorge and H380 like this.
  22. Atwater Mike
    Joined: May 31, 2002
    Posts: 11,618

    Atwater Mike
    Member

    From the beginning, I was surprised at that 'extra add-in', and mortified with its wall-thick misalignment!
    But as for its insertion in the first place: Where did it specify an 'extra piece'?
    Looked to me like a clear case of "I sawed it off twice, and it STILL too short!"
    Every one I ever narrowed ended up with one weld per side. That's all they got. No extra charge.
    Fack the 'alignment'. Supposed to be 'aligned' prior to the last flange welded.
     
    falcongeorge and oj like this.
  23. 5window
    Joined: Jan 29, 2005
    Posts: 9,948

    5window
    Member

    A whole lot of work usually comes after "Supposed to be...". :) Still wondering why we haven't heard from Moser?
     
  24. brandon
    Joined: Jul 19, 2002
    Posts: 6,377

    brandon
    Member

    Quote from Moser....."we are not in a business of used parts".... First thing Greg Moser would do , was check a axle to see if it was bent. Took 3 axles to get mine right. .....and a video of one they supplied and was out of round ... After that, we cut out own housings, and use strange for the axles.
     
    Larry T likes this.
  25. falcongeorge
    Joined: Aug 26, 2010
    Posts: 18,339

    falcongeorge
    Member
    from BC

    Really good point Larry. We tend to assume Ford built them that way based on looking at dozens of 30-50 year housings. We (me anyway) need to ask ourselves how many curbs those housings have belted, and so on in the intervening years.
     
  26. 5window
    Joined: Jan 29, 2005
    Posts: 9,948

    5window
    Member

    Semantics. It appeared that the OP took his used part to Moser Engineering and they worked on it. Seems to me that that is being in the used part business. True, they may only sell new parts, but I will assume they charged the OP to work on his used parts and, thus, they are indeed in the used part business.
     
  27. luckythirteenagogo
    Joined: Dec 28, 2012
    Posts: 1,271

    luckythirteenagogo
    Member
    from Selma, NC

    I just saw this thread and can't believe anyone that can weld that well wouldn't at least center things up a bit. I've never done this, but I would make sure everything was lined up out of principal.
     
  28. oj
    Joined: Jul 27, 2008
    Posts: 6,581

    oj
    Member

    As luck would have it I am narrowing a Dana 60 right now, I'm not ready to weld the ends on it yet but slid them on so you can see how an alignment bar works. The 1st you can see inside the case there are fixtures where the bearings go, the alignment bar (1.450" tool steel) is slide thru and the saddles torqued and the bar can be rotated, it isn't bound up. This is a very precise, machined fit - probably to the .005 mentioned earlier.
    The new housing ends are fastened inside another fixture and this is slid onto the alignment bar to weld to the axle tube. I just stuck them on for the picture, I am still working on the brackets and not ready to weld. the 2nd picture show the new ends and the fixture.
    The new ends are precisely aligned to the bearings in the carrier, the tubes are always a little wonky but when welded the ends are true to the carrier bearing and not true to the tubes. The ends are also the last to be welded to the tubes.
    The 3rd pic is shows getting the brackets positioned (I don't have a fixture for the Dana, I do have fixtures for 9" ford to hold the brackets where they need to go, and had to do a manual setup) but in the welder needed to weld these things properly, I am welding the Dana at about 350ish amps to get penetration. DSC00027.JPG DSC00030.JPG DSC00031.JPG
     
    kidcampbell71 and falcongeorge like this.
  29. hotrod428
    Joined: Feb 7, 2007
    Posts: 320

    hotrod428
    Member

    Ford machined the housings after they were welded. I've seen many OEM 9" housing ends bored off center to compensate for warpage.
     
  30. DDDenny
    Joined: Feb 6, 2015
    Posts: 22,134

    DDDenny
    Member
    from oregon

    Been said before:
    Stevie Wonder could have welded that straighter than that mess from Moser.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.