Register now to get rid of these ads!

Projects Motor mounts on Ford 302

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by kerwinq, Aug 30, 2008.

  1. kerwinq
    Joined: May 7, 2008
    Posts: 118

    kerwinq
    Member
    from Boise, id

    This may be a foolish question but here goes anyway.. I am working on a 31 ford and will be putting in a 5.0 that came out of 86 T-bird, question is are the motor mounts the same for the early 302 engines and the later models? It would be easier to maneuver a block around than the complete engine so am thinking about getting one that is already torn down. I am not going to rebuild the complete one that I have before installing it.

    Thanks, Kerwin
     
  2. SOCAL PETE
    Joined: Oct 19, 2006
    Posts: 1,204

    SOCAL PETE
    Member
    from Ramona CA

    The blocks are the same....early or new. The mounts are different depending on the car you source from.
     
  3. Malcolm
    Joined: Feb 9, 2006
    Posts: 8,183

    Malcolm
    Member
    from Nebraska

    Yep, and being Ford, there is a large number of different mounts that they used throughout the years. If you want to look around, they started the small block (221) in 1962 in the Fairlane and used the 302 in the Explorers until '99, I believe.

    www.rockauto.com is a good source - they have photos of the parts.
    Example - motor mount for a 302 in a '69 Mustang:
    <IMG style="MAX-WIDTH: 300px; ; WIDTH: expression(this.width > 300? 300: true ); MAX-HEIGHT: 400px; ; HEIGHT: expression(this.height > 400? 400: true )" src="http://info.rockauto.com/getimage/getimage.php?imagekey=314925&imageurl=http%3A//info.rockauto.com/Anchor/2257.jpg">

    Malcolm
     
  4. kerwinq
    Joined: May 7, 2008
    Posts: 118

    kerwinq
    Member
    from Boise, id

    Just want to make sure if I get another block to set up the mounts in the frame I am good to go and don't need to use the complete engine.
    Thanks for the info
     
  5. sko_ford
    Joined: Sep 27, 2002
    Posts: 3,010

    sko_ford
    Member

    that some thing i've been wondering about too. i got the wife a 63 fairlane wagon with a 260 and i found a 80's 5.0. so i should be able to use the 80's motor side and the 63 frame side? yes/no
     
  6. Judd
    Joined: Feb 26, 2003
    Posts: 1,894

    Judd
    Member

    302 should bolt right on the 260 motor side and frame side mounts, the bell housing pattern is 6 bolt on 302 and 5 bolt on 260 though.


     
  7. rustyford40
    Joined: Nov 20, 2007
    Posts: 2,168

    rustyford40
    Member
    from Mass Bay

    My 93 was the same as the 78 i pulled out
     
  8. SOCAL PETE
    Joined: Oct 19, 2006
    Posts: 1,204

    SOCAL PETE
    Member
    from Ramona CA

    Right on. The big change was in 65. The single bolt was pre 66 and the cradle was late 66 an up.
    Another alternative is RMP adjustable motor mounts.
    I had a time with shearing those stock mounts at the drags.
    Hell even normal launches would tear them in half.
    So I installed the RMP adjustables. At $225 it was a bargain...unless you like changing mounts out.
    This setups allows adjustment for engine to drive line anxles.
    Plus when you launch That baby goes straight!
    [​IMG]

    If cost scares you...just remember the original was a single bolt mount. Those frame to engine brackets will not work with the 66 and up cradle frame to engine brackets. Sourcing them with a junk car can be cheap or expensive if you go thruy a aftermarket dealer such as NPD. The cost was a few dollars more for the RMP...and they don't brake.
     
  9. dirtbag13
    Joined: Jun 16, 2008
    Posts: 2,540

    dirtbag13
    Member

    second that just put a set of rpm mounts in a off topic car i own made installation a breeze and theyr'e super stout also
     
  10. gnichols
    Joined: Mar 6, 2008
    Posts: 11,416

    gnichols
    Member
    from Tampa, FL

    On my 37 I used flat plate mounts and frame mounts for rubber donuts from Ch***is Engineering to fit a 1991 5.0. Probably not as pretty, but workable. The driver's side plate had to be milled 1/4" or so to clearance the headers. Gary

    [​IMG]
     
  11. SOCAL PETE
    Joined: Oct 19, 2006
    Posts: 1,204

    SOCAL PETE
    Member
    from Ramona CA

    Probably not as pretty, but workable...shheeet looks pretty clean.
     
  12. 56don
    Joined: Dec 11, 2005
    Posts: 10,334

    56don
    Member


    I did the exact same thing in a 32 Ford with a 289.Never had any problem with it.Simple ,cheap and quick.
     
  13. sko_ford
    Joined: Sep 27, 2002
    Posts: 3,010

    sko_ford
    Member

    the tranz bit i knew and i'm actually geting both the motor and trans so i'll need to work on the trany mount and have the drive shaft shortend
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.