Register now to get rid of these ads!

Technical multi carbs why so popular?

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by fastcar1953, Aug 14, 2022.

  1. Pinstriper40
    Joined: Sep 24, 2007
    Posts: 3,627

    Pinstriper40
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Multiple carbs are just more bitchin'er... Everybuddy knows that! IMG_20220125_133252_870.jpg IMG_20220128_105622_941.jpg
     
  2. rsss396
    Joined: Aug 30, 2009
    Posts: 130

    rsss396
    Member

    16-17 mpg on my 4 carb setup running 80-90mph on my trip to Bonneville
    I have a digital NGK Wide band O2 sensor on it, when cruising even at that speed the 4 carbs are running on the idle circuit.
    Motor turns 2500 rpms at 90mph, all 4 carbs come in together no progressive linkage
    B82A11AB-AF3C-4391-AFDF-E76C2E0E86D7.jpeg 5D9C2FCA-89F0-4C62-8AE3-4EDA3EEAD5A1.jpeg 5A5A5B84-4B1F-4AB7-993E-D3B8AE5947D3.jpeg
     
  3. fastcar1953
    Joined: Oct 23, 2009
    Posts: 3,856

    fastcar1953
    Member

    Is that a high speed chase? :D Nice ride and not afraid to drive it.
     
    rsss396 likes this.
  4. rsss396
    Joined: Aug 30, 2009
    Posts: 130

    rsss396
    Member

    Well I was kinda just trying to keep up with the rolling bones 55 car, he did not have a speedo just a tach so sometimes the pace was a little faster than average lol 23DEB0B3-B554-40A2-BA40-402CD61A13A9.jpeg
     
    rod1, mad mikey, ekimneirbo and 4 others like this.
  5. fastcar1953
    Joined: Oct 23, 2009
    Posts: 3,856

    fastcar1953
    Member

    Saw the police speedo and just wandered. :D:D:D
     
    rsss396 likes this.
  6. I'm all about equal fuel distribution

    download.jpeg
     
    desotot, mad mikey, Deuces and 9 others like this.
  7. nochop
    Joined: Nov 13, 2005
    Posts: 4,120

    nochop
    Member
    from norcal

  8. All joking aside I'm a 2x4 aficionado, all 4 of my old cars have 2x4 setups, from low profile to tunnel ram, supercharged to crossram.
    Just can't beat the look of multiple carbs.

    20170819_130400.jpg 20190924_135617.jpg 20191014_222813.jpg

    and the one for the 57 pickup

    20201208_205301.jpg
     
    mad mikey, WC145, 40FORDPU and 10 others like this.
  9. 51 mercules
    Joined: Nov 29, 2008
    Posts: 3,981

    51 mercules
    Member

    Here's a 1955 Chrysler 331 Hemi that was in my merc waiting a rebuild[​IMG]
     
  10. Adriatic Machine
    Joined: Jan 26, 2008
    Posts: 680

    Adriatic Machine
    Member

    The OEMs ditched TBI 25 years ago. Every internal combustion engine since then has one injector per cylinder.

    My uneducated opinion is that the fuel distribution is best when it matches the basic engine architecture. I-6 or 8 would then benefit from 3 or 4 small carbs and a V8 would benefit from one or two 4bbl, or 6pak.
     
    Last edited: Aug 24, 2022
    ekimneirbo likes this.
  11. A Boner
    Joined: Dec 25, 2004
    Posts: 7,706

    A Boner
    Member

    Multiple carbs, or more precisely, the lack of multiple carbs, is the reason lots of Hot Rods have full hoods!
     
  12. Because some people are gluttons for punishment when it comes to synchronizing carbs... synchronizing 2 let alone 6 sounds either terrible or a lot of fun.
     
    X-cpe and G-son like this.
  13. Boneyard51
    Joined: Dec 10, 2017
    Posts: 6,556

    Boneyard51
    Member

  14. carbking
    Joined: Dec 20, 2008
    Posts: 3,837

    carbking
    Member

    Synchronizing carburetors that are carefully selected for the engine on a manifold that is carefully selected for the engine is not a problem.

    The problem arises when the builder ignores the "six P's of engineering" ;) (See the second line in my signature block).

    Jon
     
  15. Prior planning prevents piss poor performance... makes sense
     
    ekimneirbo, Deuces, carbking and 2 others like this.
  16. jimmy six
    Joined: Mar 21, 2006
    Posts: 15,974

    jimmy six
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    And won’t buy a Unisyn….
     
  17. Toms Dogs
    Joined: Dec 16, 2005
    Posts: 576

    Toms Dogs
    Member
    from NJ

  18. Rickybop
    Joined: May 23, 2008
    Posts: 9,923

    Rickybop
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Maybe it's not just about the physical attributes.
    Sometimes I think that words have power.
    Phrases such as...
    Two deuces
    Three deuces
    Triples
    Dual quads
    Four 2s
    Six 2s
    Just roll off the tongue so nicely and seem to actually have the ability to align the stars to our liking.
    Multiple carburetors also endow super powers.
     
    mad mikey, Deuces, belair and 5 others like this.
  19. theHIGHLANDER
    Joined: Jun 3, 2005
    Posts: 10,390

    theHIGHLANDER
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Well this is an opinion topic so here's mine. Ya been warned...:cool:
    But seriously, in the hands of a patient and disciplined tuner multi carbs can be a real asset to going fast. Patient to get it right, discipline to leave it the fuck alone when it is. It's almost amazing how well and clean and fast a tri-power car can be when the linkage is right. You smack the last 2 in it feels like an automatic with passing gear in a stick shift in high gear. Is it kool? Well, duh. For us it's about getting a broad curve to the available torque in the range where the car lives. All out WFO is different, and if fast like that is the target get a big 830 annular Holley and hang on. Or a Dominator, but those are not our focus. Ultimate power-kool-torque? Webbers. In the right car their looks are almost equal to the raw power they give. They mean business but their damn sexy too. For street dual quads I like the idea of a cross ram. Again, broad TQ. I imagine a nice roller SBC, a cross ram, built to buzz about 6500. Stuff it in a mid 60s roadster or proper period 64 Malibu. Ooo weee. Done right it'll tuck your sack in your cracko_O But the original question? Fk'n eh its kool. Hells yeah it'll work. What more could ya want?
     
  20. 4speed411
    Joined: Jun 8, 2013
    Posts: 443

    4speed411
    Member

  21. Flathead Freddie
    Joined: May 9, 2021
    Posts: 806

    Flathead Freddie
    Member

    It's about who is the best badboy . Single throat injectors also it's a world of excessive fuel and watery eyes and , " stick it look what I've got ". I compare it to the engine having children and the sound is like Yyyaaahh !!! I'm gonna floor it and keep it there !!
     
  22. Rickybop
    Joined: May 23, 2008
    Posts: 9,923

    Rickybop
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Sack in the crack?
    Wow... that's fast.
     
  23. fastcar1953
    Joined: Oct 23, 2009
    Posts: 3,856

    fastcar1953
    Member

    I picked these up at auction. One for 57 olds and one for 57 pontiac. 302250254_5770160699674835_2940397420293599615_n.jpg 302519367_5770161433008095_4283874099468403483_n.jpg
     
  24. tricky steve
    Joined: Aug 4, 2008
    Posts: 449

    tricky steve
    Member
    from fenton,mo.

    4gth4h.jpg DSC04426.JPG This engine makes 55+ more power than a single carb, even with a dominator, plus I think it looks good, way better than a single carb. I've proven it time and time again, that a tunnel ram (tuned properly) makes a bunch more power. and it's all dyno proven, There have been times where multi-carbs. just plain, will not work. had a customer bring in a small block chevy (?) with one of the goofy 3X strombergs on top of a 6-71 blower. no dice, wouldn't even flow enough to idle. no way to get it to run on the dyno. could probably get it to "run" around the parking lot if you're a parking lot cruiser.. but zero chance it would run for power.
    Joel (hemi Joel on here) has a early hemi with like 6 or 8 carburetors on it, it runs way down in the bottom 10's N/A and does drag week with us.. Also, Brian Kohlman, (racer x ) has run really quick in a coupe with a blown hemi with a bunch of 2 barrels on top of the blower, like 6 or 8 of them he does drag week too, but now he has a ridiculous late model hemi on NITRO !
    . I've had mixed results with cross ram intakes, or short runner (low rise) 2X4 intakes. I've been tuning mulit-carb set ups for over 45 years, so it just seems natural to me lol . Hemi Joel and Brian (racer X on here) have the patience of saints.
     
  25. I'm in the beginning stages of putting a dual 2bbl (2 94s) manifold and carb setup on my '50 Ford Flathead. I bought a new speedway manifold and have a pair of good 94s to use. I need to figure out linkage details and such, and I bought some different size jets to experiment with. Should keep me busy for a bit sorting it all out. :cool:
     
    Toms Dogs likes this.
  26. sunbeam
    Joined: Oct 22, 2010
    Posts: 6,297

    sunbeam
    Member

    Keeps the wife from wanting to drive it
     
  27. jimpopper
    Joined: Feb 3, 2013
    Posts: 343

    jimpopper
    Member

    If you have to ask, you need to see for yourself. No hood required. A truck 2.JPG
     
  28. mgtstumpy
    Joined: Jul 20, 2006
    Posts: 9,228

    mgtstumpy
    Member

    Two are better than one 201903131255-4K41F230913-3.jpg

    Six are better than two
    269969046_1312245385865566_6855743523113484202_n.jpg
     
    rod1, mad mikey, Deuces and 5 others like this.
  29. Multiple carbs fit the era we build to.
    IMG_4317.JPG
     
    mad mikey, Deuces and WC145 like this.
  30. ekimneirbo
    Joined: Apr 29, 2017
    Posts: 4,717

    ekimneirbo

    The thing about carb set ups is that some people do it to be "Kool" and some do it to be "Faster". You can usually look at the rest of the car and get some idea whether someone is a poser or is serious about actually gaining performance with their carb setup.
    Its kinda like the guy that wears his baseball cap backwards and thinks it makes him look Kool.......its usually not hard to tell the posers from the real performance guys.

    Ask yourself.........do people look at your car and think you built it with some real performance in mind? Or do they look at it and think it looks "cute" ?
     
    mad mikey likes this.

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.