Register now to get rid of these ads!

My 32 5w build

Discussion in 'Traditional Hot Rods' started by mylle, Jun 28, 2014.

  1. hotrd32
    Joined: May 16, 2007
    Posts: 3,566

    hotrd32
    Member
    from WA

    Always love to see a traditional 5 window build .... bit of a weakness.
     
  2. fab32
    Joined: May 14, 2002
    Posts: 13,985

    fab32
    Member Emeritus

    Gotta keep an eye on this one. Of course I've followed every '32 5w build on the HAMB since joining over 12 years ago as the 5w bought in 1976 has yet to be built. I've got some awesome parts waiting in the wings and only need a swift kick in the ass to get going.

    Frank
     
    kidcampbell71 likes this.
  3. 3wLarry
    Joined: Mar 11, 2005
    Posts: 12,804

    3wLarry
    Member Emeritus
    from Owasso, Ok

    note to self...give Frank a swift kick in the ass
     
    kidcampbell71 likes this.
  4. Roadsir
    Joined: Jun 3, 2006
    Posts: 4,044

    Roadsir
    Member

    Nice build, what is the story on the chrome lasalle case, is it newly plated or old? Neat piece. Are the wheels 15's or 16's?
     
  5. nz33
    Joined: Sep 11, 2009
    Posts: 5

    nz33
    Member

    ' Yeh, thay look great reversed! '

    I think they do too and perfect for this project I think ! No intention to hijack this thread but just to show how damn good they look ! 16x5 Lincoln's not so easy to find now as we used on the rear of mine .. looking forward to following this build .. love the Caddy . Thank you for sharing this build IMG_0637.JPG

    IMG_1119.JPG
     
    racinman and texkbc like this.
  6. King Surf Tattoo
    Joined: Sep 21, 2010
    Posts: 2

    King Surf Tattoo
    Member
    from Sweden

    hehe go go stefan will be awsome
     
  7. Had to come back and eyeball your chrome crash box. Love that thing.
     
  8. big duece
    Joined: Jul 28, 2008
    Posts: 6,977

    big duece
    Member
    from kansas

    The low on the axle thing works like this..

    see the plates welded to the axle? those are deeper than the stock ones, so the bones are sitting lower in relation to the axle, in effect lowering the rear, and providing clearance where the bones run close to the bottom of the chassis rails.


    This is from another thread here on the HAMB, there ARE ways to lower a banjo rear without the bones hitting the frame rails. C notching may be required. '36 bones are used here.
    [​IMG]
     
  9. Stovebolt
    Joined: May 2, 2001
    Posts: 3,629

    Stovebolt
    Member

    Big Deuce.
    There is another reason that the axle you posted a picture of has the deep bracket to mount the radius rod, and that is, that the axle bell if a post '36 bell, and its diameter at the wishbone mounting point is larger than the original '36 axle bell.
    On a 36 rear the 36 rear bones mount at the axle centre-line. As later axles are of a larger diameter, there is not the room to place the bolt holes for the rear wishbones, therefore you need to drop the mounting point to below axle centre-line - how far you drop them below will effectively determine how much lowering you can give the rear of the car.

    On my last trip to Los Angeles, I was under the Joe Mach-built dark green Caddy-powered 35 Ford roadster. The rear of that car was lowered by making up a spacer that was essentially a "Y" bracket that went between the original the bones and the axle tube. This car had all its modifications made to that by removing the rodded components the car could revert back to an original car by bolting the original stuff back into it.

    Enough rambling from me - back to normal programming
     
  10. Fortunateson
    Joined: Apr 30, 2012
    Posts: 5,686

    Fortunateson
    Member

    Can the guts of a '40 rear end be installed into the housing (centre section and bells) of a '32? (Don't mean to hi-jack)
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Oct 16, 2014
  11. racinman
    Joined: Dec 30, 2008
    Posts: 951

    racinman
    Member Emeritus

    Yes Like Steve NZ33 from NZ said... it looks Great... I remember his car!
     
  12. Andy
    Joined: Nov 17, 2002
    Posts: 5,350

    Andy
    Member

    No, The 32 is a different design without the straddle mounted pinion.
     
  13. Andy
    Joined: Nov 17, 2002
    Posts: 5,350

    Andy
    Member

    Another reason to mount the bones lower is that it reduces the loads on the bones. The lower the bones, the lower the bending loads. It is hard to visualize, or except, but if the bones were exactly at tire contact heigth, there would be no bending loads, only thrust and drag forces. Think about it!
     
  14. TANNERGANG
    Joined: Jan 18, 2011
    Posts: 1,277

    TANNERGANG
    BANNED
    from alabama

    I'm from Mobile also....sold you a set of '40 Ford wheels about a year or so ago...delivered them to the metal building by the railroad track.......your business their is like a 2 story building on a vacant lot....no one would ever guess what you do their...............going to be a Nice Build.....but I'm partial to '32 5 Windows........finishing one up myself...not traditional, but body is bone stock...uncut or filled roof........late model chassis and running gear, but the body is as Henry made it.
     
  15. alchemy
    Joined: Sep 27, 2002
    Posts: 22,294

    alchemy
    Member

    If it's a later 32 axle, yes. Does the flange where the torquetube and center meet have a scalloped edge? If yes, then it's a late style and the 40 guts can be installed with machine work.

    If the flange is round, then they can't be installed.
     
  16. Fortunateson
    Joined: Apr 30, 2012
    Posts: 5,686

    Fortunateson
    Member

    I'll have to look a little more closely. I think it's an early however judging from the firewall. I do have a spare '32 rear-end to check as well. How much machining? I have a '40 I was going to use but thought changing out the guts might be easier than dealing with the spring issue re: the 'rear crossmember.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.