Register now to get rid of these ads!

Technical Need advice on a flathead block

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by Bill00, Nov 9, 2024.

  1. Bill00
    Joined: Jul 16, 2016
    Posts: 5

    Bill00
    Member
    from WV

    It seems to be a good block. It had the sleeves removed and was bored for 239 Merc pistons. Question is, can I bore it .030 over or will I need to sleeve it? flathead block.jpg
     
  2. GordonC
    Joined: Mar 6, 2006
    Posts: 3,468

    GordonC
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    They can be bored to 3 3/8" as I understand it. My 1950 8 BA is bored to 3 5/16". I run it on the street and it runs at about 165/175 degrees most of the time. Going bigger could get you in trouble...
     
  3. Bandit Billy
    Joined: Sep 16, 2014
    Posts: 15,701

    Bandit Billy
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    My 49 8BA is .125" over, no overheating, no issues... other than the T-5 I fried.
     
    Toms Dogs likes this.
  4. Budget36
    Joined: Nov 29, 2014
    Posts: 15,209

    Budget36
    Member

    Curious what the current bore size is now. Was this a 221 before?
     
  5. Bill00
    Joined: Jul 16, 2016
    Posts: 5

    Bill00
    Member
    from WV

    Yes, it was a 221 with the stock sleeves now it's bored to 239 or 3.1875.
     
    warbird1 likes this.
  6. Budget36
    Joined: Nov 29, 2014
    Posts: 15,209

    Budget36
    Member

  7. Bearing Burner
    Joined: Mar 2, 2009
    Posts: 1,207

    Bearing Burner
    Member
    from W. MA

    I had one bored to 3 3/8 +.030 walls paper thin. 33/8 good grind Merc crank to 4 1/8
     
  8. chicken
    Joined: Aug 15, 2004
    Posts: 677

    chicken
    Member
    from Kansas

    Bill, if it had sleeves removed and was bored to fit 239 pistons, then another .030" is only .015" per side more. I'd say you'll still have good wall thickness at that diameter. I can't recall what the sleeve thickness was, but Ford put plenty of wall behind those sleeves. Seems like some (or all ) were .083" larger diameter.
     
  9. ronnieroadster
    Joined: Sep 9, 2004
    Posts: 1,181

    ronnieroadster
    Member

    Chicken above is correct when the tin sleeves are removed the bore was just over .080 larger. Ford offered a set of pistons and rings to put in the block when the sleeves were removed. So the additional bore of .030 over at the now 3 3/16 should work.
    Ronnieroadster
     
    Toms Dogs likes this.
  10. Bill00
    Joined: Jul 16, 2016
    Posts: 5

    Bill00
    Member
    from WV

    Thanks for the input guys. For some reason, I was thinking 3 3/16 was max safe bore size. This is good news. I'm going to start looking for some pistons now.
     
  11. krylon32
    Joined: Jan 29, 2006
    Posts: 10,707

    krylon32
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from Nebraska
    1. Central Nebraska H.A.M.B.

    Would a sonic? test of the wall thickness be in order?
     
  12. Bill00
    Joined: Jul 16, 2016
    Posts: 5

    Bill00
    Member
    from WV

    I don't know, might not hurt. I wonder what thickness would be a no-go?
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.