Register now to get rid of these ads!

History Nuclear Powered Vehicle Concepts

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by FrozenMerc, Jan 21, 2014.

  1. FrozenMerc
    Joined: Sep 4, 2009
    Posts: 3,330

    FrozenMerc
    Member

    We have talked quite a bit about the Ford Nucleon on here, but there were many other vehicles from the mid century post war years that were designed to run on the power of the atom. From the confines of the 21st century, some these ideas seem ludicrous on their face, but after the war, there seemed to be no end to the possibilities that would appear with each and every split of an atom. This is a great article on some of the different concepts that engineers came up with.

    http://io9.com/nuclear-powered-vehicle-concepts-from-the-mid-20th-cent-1154385972

    Ford Nucleon
    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    Some Concepts were actually produced like nuclear powered jet engine powering the Corvair XB-36H

    [​IMG]

    Ford Seatlle-Ite
    [​IMG]

    Even Atomic Locomotives
    [​IMG]
     
  2. Nuclear & traditional just don't mix. HRP
     
  3. Been awaiting a thread that I can post in that may be closed shortly...

    Nukes are a great idea. I'd say that every house should be nuclear powered for at least heating. One little pellet of whatever in a sealed reactor would last for 5 years.

    But someone would have to try to turn them into a bomb...

    Bob
     
  4. LAROKE
    Joined: Sep 5, 2007
    Posts: 2,088

    LAROKE
    Member

    I guess it's time to duck and cover.
     
  5. traffic61
    Joined: Jun 15, 2009
    Posts: 1,558

    traffic61
    Member
    from Owasso, OK

    Talking about nukey is traditional, isn't it?
     
  6. the-rodster
    Joined: Jul 2, 2003
    Posts: 6,959

    the-rodster
    Member

    There is no such thing.

    Rich
     
  7. US and the USSR both had nuclear powered aircraft development programmes. US decided not to go operational because of the risk to civilian population. The USSR pretended that they actually had an operational nuclear powered bomber just to piss the US off.
     
  8. LAROKE
    Joined: Sep 5, 2007
    Posts: 2,088

    LAROKE
    Member

    'Nother weapon development program that was shelved was the atomic hand grenade.
     
  9. the-rodster
    Joined: Jul 2, 2003
    Posts: 6,959

    the-rodster
    Member

    That plane contained a nuclear reactor.

    It was jet propelled.

    Rich
     
  10. hotrodarchaeologist
    Joined: Dec 4, 2007
    Posts: 656

    hotrodarchaeologist
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from Maine

    A jet with propellers?
     
  11. Relic Stew
    Joined: Apr 17, 2005
    Posts: 1,237

    Relic Stew
    Member
    from Wisconsin

    Six turning, four burning.


    I have a Car Life with an article about the future of atomic cars. Ford FX Atmos on the cover.

    [​IMG]
     
  12. badshifter
    Joined: Apr 28, 2006
    Posts: 3,606

    badshifter
    Member

    Nuclear and CUSTOM mix....as proved by this:


    [​IMG]
     
  13. the-rodster
    Joined: Jul 2, 2003
    Posts: 6,959

    the-rodster
    Member


    From wiki....

    "Power was supplied by six Pratt & Whitney propeller and four GE J47 jet engines. The reactor did not power any of the plane's systems, nor did it provide propulsion, but was placed on the NB-36 to verify that the plane could actually carry and run it in the air.<SUP>"</SUP>
     
  14. joel
    Joined: Oct 10, 2009
    Posts: 2,677

    joel
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    That's funny!
     
  15. Mike51Merc
    Joined: Dec 5, 2008
    Posts: 3,855

    Mike51Merc
    Member

    Nukes produce heat, and heat produces steam. The only way to give a vehicle nuclear power is to install a steam engine. I don't see any aircraft with steam engines.

    PS. Don't tell Batman!
     
  16. treb11
    Joined: Jan 21, 2006
    Posts: 4,104

    treb11
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    wrong:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ion_thruster
     
  17. Mike51Merc
    Joined: Dec 5, 2008
    Posts: 3,855

    Mike51Merc
    Member

  18. treb11
    Joined: Jan 21, 2006
    Posts: 4,104

    treb11
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Oh now yer just splittin hairs ....or atoms....
     
  19. James D
    Joined: Feb 8, 2007
    Posts: 4,907

    James D
    Member

    Nuclear ram jets were tested by the US military.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Pluto
     
  20. edwardlloyd
    Joined: Aug 2, 2003
    Posts: 2,074

    edwardlloyd
    Member
    from Germany

    Oh good Lord, i want that Ford Nucleon!!!


    Twitter @edsrodshop
     
  21. fsae0607
    Joined: Apr 3, 2012
    Posts: 872

    fsae0607
    Member


    Sucks... can't have anything cool because of idiots :mad:
     
  22. Mike51Merc
    Joined: Dec 5, 2008
    Posts: 3,855

    Mike51Merc
    Member

    Yeah, again, not exactly the stuff that passenger vehicles are made of...

    The Nuclear Age ushered in all kinds of fantasies that the magical properties of atomic energy could perform for mankind. That was until they figured out that the shit kills ya.
     
  23. Deuces
    Joined: Nov 3, 2009
    Posts: 26,424

    Deuces

    The wheelbase is too short.... Other than that, it looks wicked...
     
  24. Bigplum
    Joined: Nov 26, 2013
    Posts: 7

    Bigplum
    Member

    That car would be perfectly safe, it's got no doors !
     
  25. Relic Stew
    Joined: Apr 17, 2005
    Posts: 1,237

    Relic Stew
    Member
    from Wisconsin

    Burning gasoline/diesel/jet fuel produces heat. I.C. engines run on hot air, how you heat the air doesn't really matter.

    The reactor heats salts to molten. Air from the jet compressor passes through a heat exchanger in the salt. The heated air then spins the jet turbine.
     

    Attached Files:

  26. jon83
    Joined: Nov 16, 2010
    Posts: 49

    jon83

    chance of nuclear radiation exposure at every vehicle accident.. seems safe.
     
  27. [​IMG]

    aaahhh the good ol' convair b-36 peacemaker. 'two turning, two burning, two smokin', two jokin' and two more unaccounted for' they built hundreds of these things, but theres only one that survived
     
  28. belair
    Joined: Jul 10, 2006
    Posts: 9,036

    belair
    Member

    As above Convair, not Corvair.
     
  29. bubblesbacon
    Joined: Nov 12, 2011
    Posts: 269

    bubblesbacon
    Member
    from wisconsin

    and they thought running into the back of a PINTO would cause an explosion?? :D
     
  30. "Atomic batteries to power, turbines to speed" B to R
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.