Register now to get rid of these ads!

History On the eighth day...Birth of the Hemi!

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by Bruce Lancaster, Sep 3, 2008.

  1. Bruce Lancaster
    Joined: Oct 9, 2001
    Posts: 21,681

    Bruce Lancaster
    Member Emeritus

  2. scootermcrad
    Joined: Sep 20, 2005
    Posts: 12,383

    scootermcrad
    Member

    WOW!

    You give new definition to library! HAHA! ;)
     
  3. chaddilac
    Joined: Mar 21, 2006
    Posts: 14,057

    chaddilac
    Member

    Wow! that's pretty cool!
     
  4. Bruce Lancaster
    Joined: Oct 9, 2001
    Posts: 21,681

    Bruce Lancaster
    Member Emeritus

    That cross-section drawing needs to be a T-shirt.
     
  5. flatheadpete
    Joined: Oct 29, 2003
    Posts: 10,634

    flatheadpete
    Member
    from Burton, MI

    I'd buy one.
     
  6. Pir8Darryl
    Joined: Jan 9, 2008
    Posts: 2,487

    Pir8Darryl
    Member

    Go for it. The actual pattent is not coppyrighted, and even if I'm wrong and it is, it has long since expired.
     
  7. scootermcrad
    Joined: Sep 20, 2005
    Posts: 12,383

    scootermcrad
    Member

    Me too!!!!!!!! :eek::eek: I want one!! Two even!!
     
  8. Gotgas
    Joined: Jul 22, 2004
    Posts: 7,238

    Gotgas
    Member
    from DFW USA

    I dig it.

    I would even leave all the engineering marks and references. :cool:

    [​IMG]
     
  9. panic
    Joined: Jan 3, 2004
    Posts: 1,450

    panic

    Errrrrrr...

    The patent doesn't claim the hemi design (which was already over 40 years old).
    The claim is for some anti-knock changes in chamber shape.
     
  10. George
    Joined: Jan 1, 2005
    Posts: 7,914

    George
    Member

    Anyone can make a Hemi, they just can't call it a Hemi. Chrysler trademarked the name.
     
  11. R Pope
    Joined: Jan 23, 2006
    Posts: 3,309

    R Pope
    Member

    Chrysler's first Hemi was a 2220 cube inverted V16 aircraft engine, 1944. Arkus Duntov made hemi heads long before Chrysler. (Ardun)
     
  12. Bruce Lancaster
    Joined: Oct 9, 2001
    Posts: 21,681

    Bruce Lancaster
    Member Emeritus

    It's rather like Fords engine patents of the late twenties and early thirties I posted... whole engine involved, but limited claims. Just marking territory, establishing a proprietary stamp on a package.
    Lotta things everyone was doing...piston and rod redesign to lower engine package, lots of thought about suitability for developing trend to very high compression, and of course the big leap forward in displacment that the new OHV's represented.
    Chrysler put notable attention into breathing...GM wasn't thinking about that yet. Their early designs had power curves when souped that dropped dead at about the same R's as their flathead competitors...note that it took the Chrysler to reall displace the flathead at high end racing.
    Engine patent claims are usually very limited because so many of the elements are so basic no matter how developed. Even a radical rocker arm like these is still about the same thing as a Mesopotamian well sweep...
     
  13. I love the name of the patent holder - W.E. Drinkard. That me and my buddies on a Friday night!
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.