Register now to get rid of these ads!

Technical Packard trans/adaptor/bellhousing question

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by 64T-bolt, Apr 14, 2025.

  1. 64T-bolt
    Joined: Aug 6, 2007
    Posts: 173

    64T-bolt
    Member
    from Kansas

    IMG_4374.jpeg IMG_4373.jpeg IMG_4372.jpeg IMG_4369.jpeg IMG_4370.jpeg IMG_4371.jpeg IMG_4368.jpeg I received this packard trans with my model a coupe I’m building. I want to run it behind my ‘40 flathead. It came with Lucas adaptor plate, and the broken bellhousing attached. It also came with the hildebrandt adaptor bell. What should I run? The Lucas plate has a lot more material and fasteners, is steel. If I run it, does anyone know what the broken bellhousing is? Or should I run the aluminum piece, it only attaches with 4 bolts threaded into the aluminum.. I’m kinda new to this flathead game. Is the packard trans a good choice?
     
  2. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 24,513

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    The black bell is a 4 Speed bellhousing, from a 1935-1952 Ford truck.

    Shown with a GM pattern adapter.
     
    dana barlow likes this.
  3. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 24,513

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

  4. 64T-bolt
    Joined: Aug 6, 2007
    Posts: 173

    64T-bolt
    Member
    from Kansas

    so is this a GM trans or was the Packard trans GM pattern? (Excuse my ignorance)
     
  5. 64T-bolt
    Joined: Aug 6, 2007
    Posts: 173

    64T-bolt
    Member
    from Kansas

    Would there be any reason to not run the Hildebrandt piece?
     
  6. warbird1
    Joined: Jan 3, 2015
    Posts: 1,350

    warbird1
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    If it fits the engine and transmission use it. Just be sure to dial it in to check the alignment before installing the transmission...
     
    64T-bolt and gimpyshotrods like this.
  7. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 24,513

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    I cannot see enough of the transmission to identify it.

    The position of the shifter tower looks Packard. I think they went to column shifters in about 1939.
     
    64T-bolt likes this.
  8. HEATHEN
    Joined: Nov 22, 2005
    Posts: 9,031

    HEATHEN
    Member
    from SIDNEY, NY

    That's a Packard transmission. The bolt pattern looks similar to a G.M. pattern, but the bolt holes sit lower in relation to the center hole; in other words, it looks like a G.M. pattern that has slid down lower on the bell housing.
     
    gimpyshotrods and 64T-bolt like this.

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.