Register now to get rid of these ads!

Hot Rods Picked up a '32 Chevy

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by JSchmitz67, Mar 29, 2026.

  1. JSchmitz67
    Joined: Feb 22, 2026
    Posts: 54

    JSchmitz67
    Member
    from Union, MO

    WOW! Love the Pontiac of course! You've got mad skills! I'm adding that to my bookmarks for reference. I saw a blue '32 Pontiac for sale on Facebook marketplace for like $23k. Looks like a killer deal. The Sprint engines kinda scare me. They are awesome. But building one, finding parts etc. IDK. I'm too old for some battles.
     
    Sharpone and 31 B'ville like this.
  2. JSchmitz67
    Joined: Feb 22, 2026
    Posts: 54

    JSchmitz67
    Member
    from Union, MO

    I hear ya. I just put my Muncie back in my '64 GTO after a long time with slush-box. I'm probably done drag racing. Gotta break the clutch in a little more then bang gears!!! :)
     
    Sharpone likes this.
  3. JSchmitz67
    Joined: Feb 22, 2026
    Posts: 54

    JSchmitz67
    Member
    from Union, MO

    Trying to figure out front shock mount options. Anybody want to educate me?
     
  4. JSchmitz67
    Joined: Feb 22, 2026
    Posts: 54

    JSchmitz67
    Member
    from Union, MO

    The 250 six was rebuilt using V8 pistons. He said he thought from a 305 or 307. Two extra pistons came with it. They are +.030". I measured one this morning. I'm confused. Looks like it would be stock bore diameter? Maybe they honed it and put new rings in? Maybe I'm missing the obvious. I guess the casting number means nothing.

    Parts 27.jpeg Parts 28.jpeg
     
    Okie Pete likes this.
  5. patsurf
    Joined: Jan 18, 2018
    Posts: 3,388

    patsurf

    does it mean a .030 v8 is what fits std. 6 cyl.?
     
  6. JSchmitz67
    Joined: Feb 22, 2026
    Posts: 54

    JSchmitz67
    Member
    from Union, MO

    Yes. But I don't see a Chevy V8 that is that dimension at +.030". Usually ***ume a rebuilt engine gets bored cylinders. That would put the 250 at 3.875" + .030" @ 3.905". Piston being a couple of thousandths less of course. Thus my confusion. Hopefully a more seasoned engine builder will shed some light on this. Not that it matters a ton. Ha
     
  7. Hot Rods Ta Hell
    Joined: Apr 20, 2008
    Posts: 4,839

    Hot Rods Ta Hell
    Member

    Great start! Reminds me of the late great Pat Ganahl's blue, Chevy six powered 32 Chevy coupe...
     
    Sharpone and JSchmitz67 like this.
  8. Kona Cruisers
    Joined: Feb 4, 2007
    Posts: 1,106

    Kona Cruisers
    Member

    Part of the 32 Chevy Gang myself! looking good keep up the work!
     
    Sharpone and JSchmitz67 like this.
  9. mitch 36
    Joined: Aug 21, 2006
    Posts: 1,786

    mitch 36
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Schmitz, 307 pistons are right for a 250, they bump the CR a bit as long as they dont have a chamfer around the top of the piston as did the stock 250 pistons. I see yours have the chamfered edge so your CR should be same as stock 250.
     
    Sharpone and JSchmitz67 like this.
  10. JSchmitz67
    Joined: Feb 22, 2026
    Posts: 54

    JSchmitz67
    Member
    from Union, MO

    I see. Thanks for the insight. But standard 307 bore is same as 250 bore right? So they must not have bored the block. Surprised that a machine shop would do that. Maybe that's why they're permanently closed. Lol!
     
    Sharpone likes this.
  11. JSchmitz67
    Joined: Feb 22, 2026
    Posts: 54

    JSchmitz67
    Member
    from Union, MO

    Got some pics?
     
    Sharpone likes this.
  12. mitch 36
    Joined: Aug 21, 2006
    Posts: 1,786

    mitch 36
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Schmitz, both engines use a 3.875 bore so if your pistons are marked .030, the block has been bored.
     
    Sharpone and RMR&C like this.
  13. JSchmitz67
    Joined: Feb 22, 2026
    Posts: 54

    JSchmitz67
    Member
    from Union, MO

    I agree in theory. But stock bore is 3.875 (minus a couple thousandths piston to wall clearance). So, 3.875" + .030" should measure 3.905ish correct? This +.030" piston measures 3.879". Thus my confusion.
     
    Sharpone likes this.
  14. mitch 36
    Joined: Aug 21, 2006
    Posts: 1,786

    mitch 36
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Hmmmm, So it seems that you have 30 over 305 pistons which I really don't know if they may or may not work. I think you're on to something with the hone job/ re-ring thinking. It appears that the small end of the rods have to be enlarged to fit the 305s wrist pins. Someone smarter than me (NOT HARD) will know.
     
    Last edited: Apr 8, 2026
    Sharpone and JSchmitz67 like this.
  15. TCTND
    Joined: Dec 27, 2019
    Posts: 854

    TCTND
    Member

    Your car is quietly murmuring "chop me..chop me.........."
     
    Sharpone and JSchmitz67 like this.
  16. JSchmitz67
    Joined: Feb 22, 2026
    Posts: 54

    JSchmitz67
    Member
    from Union, MO

    Ha. I do like a little chop. We'll see. Not gonna do it myself. Might price it.
     
    Sharpone likes this.
  17. JSchmitz67
    Joined: Feb 22, 2026
    Posts: 54

    JSchmitz67
    Member
    from Union, MO

    Took the fenders, and running boards, off yesterday. Transformed from aristocrat to street fighter (possible slight exaggeration). :)

    Chevy 49.jpeg
     
  18. JSchmitz67
    Joined: Feb 22, 2026
    Posts: 54

    JSchmitz67
    Member
    from Union, MO

    My mind is quietly murmuring, "channel the body down over the frame".
     
    duecesteve, Sharpone and Moondog13 like this.
  19. warbird1
    Joined: Jan 3, 2015
    Posts: 1,482

    warbird1
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Looks great the way it is, if it were mine I'd leave the top alone...
     
    Moondog13 and JSchmitz67 like this.
  20. JSchmitz67
    Joined: Feb 22, 2026
    Posts: 54

    JSchmitz67
    Member
    from Union, MO

    Good chance that will be the case...
     
  21. brokedownbiker
    Joined: Jun 7, 2016
    Posts: 734

    brokedownbiker
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

  22. JSchmitz67
    Joined: Feb 22, 2026
    Posts: 54

    JSchmitz67
    Member
    from Union, MO

    Nice! Thanks for sharing!
     
    Sharpone likes this.
  23. AmishMike
    Joined: Mar 27, 2014
    Posts: 1,566

    AmishMike
    Member

    looks great - glad to see in post #20 still has leaf front suspension. stick with it screams chevy. & keep the torque 6
     
    JSchmitz67 likes this.
  24. JSchmitz67
    Joined: Feb 22, 2026
    Posts: 54

    JSchmitz67
    Member
    from Union, MO

    Thanks! Nope...the six is getting the axe. I'm thinking SBC with single carb tunnel ram (anyone have one for sale?).

    I picked up some SBC Sanderson headers for $90. :) Anyone know if these will work in a '32 Chevy with a SBC and the original steering box? Or a SBC and original steering box/location at all.

    Headers.jpeg
     
    Okie Pete and Sharpone like this.
  25. RMR&C
    Joined: Dec 26, 2009
    Posts: 6,466

    RMR&C
    Member
    from NW Montana

    They look like block huggers, so they should work. I ran rams horn manifolds on a SBC and an F100 steering box in my 33 Chev frame......worked fine
     
    Sharpone likes this.
  26. JSchmitz67
    Joined: Feb 22, 2026
    Posts: 54

    JSchmitz67
    Member
    from Union, MO

    Ok, thanks. I'll know in the not soo distant future. Just looking down the road. I won't have them coated until I make sure they don't need any adjustments.
     
    Sharpone likes this.
  27. GuyW
    Joined: Feb 23, 2007
    Posts: 995

    GuyW
    Member

    I don't think you'll like driving the original steering box...
     
  28. JSchmitz67
    Joined: Feb 22, 2026
    Posts: 54

    JSchmitz67
    Member
    from Union, MO

    What's bad about them? Is it the ratio? I have no experience with one. The former owner replaced all original drag links, tie rod ends, king pins, etc. The factory box seems to have minimal lash.

    I'm also thinking about front and rear anti-sway bars. This would be a monumental handling improvement.
     
    Sharpone likes this.
  29. Lookin' good:cool:!!
     
    Sharpone and JSchmitz67 like this.
  30. Sharpone and JSchmitz67 like this.

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.