Register now to get rid of these ads!

Technical Pics of your front shackles with dropped axles

Discussion in 'Traditional Hot Rods' started by Roothawg, Nov 1, 2014.

  1. flamedabone
    Joined: Aug 3, 2001
    Posts: 5,639

    flamedabone
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    YEA!!! Glad you got it.

    Is that a 35 truck? Gonna need some pics...

    -Abone.
     
  2. Roothawg
    Joined: Mar 14, 2001
    Posts: 25,617

    Roothawg
    Member

  3. Looks a lot better with the shackles flipped the right way; but would have thought they would have been sitting flatter without the weight of the engine etc.
     
  4. verde742
    Joined: Aug 11, 2010
    Posts: 6,493

    verde742
    Member

    are you sure the shock mount "thingie" doesn't need to go to the other side of the car?

    Not sayin' it very well, but if both of them were changed to other side ? just sayin'?
     
  5. Roothawg
    Joined: Mar 14, 2001
    Posts: 25,617

    Roothawg
    Member

    Not sure. I'll have a look at it when I get some more time.
     
  6. 19Fordy
    Joined: May 17, 2003
    Posts: 8,264

    19Fordy
    Member

    40 Ford with 4 inch dropped axle and Posie reversed eye spring.
    Shackle should be at about a 45 degree angle.
     

    Attached Files:

  7. Atwater Mike
    Joined: May 31, 2002
    Posts: 11,619

    Atwater Mike
    Member

    I used to make the 'triangle' shackles to mount shocks, not my idea; I stole it from a '34 in the 'Little Pages', back around 1953! Glad to see it back, lots better than that cockeyed add-on 'stud' below the spring hanger. (and that long, soft repro hanger!)
    Some guys like 'em, but every one I see is crooked after a few miles...or ends up welded onto the lower yoke of the wishbone...the ones with keyways sheared off, unless the shocks were so soft they were ineffective.
     
  8. verde742
    Joined: Aug 11, 2010
    Posts: 6,493

    verde742
    Member

    not applicable. wrong subject. IMO
     
  9. verde742
    Joined: Aug 11, 2010
    Posts: 6,493

    verde742
    Member

    not on subject,, IMO
     
  10. verde742, how on earth was my post not applicable and wrong subject???? What was the heading?? The photo I posted show front shackles on a dropped axle, that photo alone would have shown the OP what the problem was with his front shackles or is it just because the spring is in front of the axle, we didn't know that then but it would have still sorted the situation out.......which it did. Cheers for your concern.o_O JW
     
    RICH B likes this.
  11. verde742
    Joined: Aug 11, 2010
    Posts: 6,493

    verde742
    Member

    OK, take me off yer list. I thought about the 3rd picture down it showed a '36, which have spring in front of axle: Then comes yers with spring on top.... But then I am old.
     
  12. I'm thinking if you used a stock off the shelf 35-40 spring with a narrow CE axle that the the spring is just still too big
     
  13. What is the difference between the perch bot centres on this CE verses a 35-36 axle?
    verde742..we're good. JW:)
     
  14. okiedokie
    Joined: Jul 5, 2005
    Posts: 4,890

    okiedokie
    Member
    from Ok

    35-36 axles have 36 1/2" perch centers according to Sids site. CE says there are 35". When I ordered my CE axle I was told they were now shipping SoCal axles, which were the same as theirs. However the axle I received is 33 1/2" . Certainly moves the bones farther in for tire clearance. It is a 47" wide axle which is the same as theirs. I can vouch for the fact that Speedways 35-40 Ford front 4 bars will not work with the SoCal axle, if that is what I have. No logo on it.
     
  15. Soviet
    Joined: Sep 4, 2005
    Posts: 729

    Soviet
    Member

    Look at these two again. Wrong or right aside, the shocks will be different as the compressed and extended lengths look to vary by over an inch.
     
  16. Roothawg
    Joined: Mar 14, 2001
    Posts: 25,617

    Roothawg
    Member

    I haven't thought about this for a while, I've been on other parts of the build. I will revisit this soon.
     
  17. DDDenny
    Joined: Feb 6, 2015
    Posts: 21,032

    DDDenny
    Member
    from oregon

    Just to stir the pot a little!!!
    Here are two shots of my roadsters spring/shackle attachment.
    Anyone recognize this setup?
    Hint: this is only used on one side, the other side is your typical shackle arrangement.
    Now this is where you old dirt trackers can give everyone an education on it's merits,
    explained much better than I can I'm sure.
    CE axle 001.jpg CE axle 002.jpg
     
  18. Yip, the dead perch, used on the L/H side of the front spring ( for L/H turning) to prevent shackle swing. JW
     
    dana barlow likes this.
  19. krylon32
    Joined: Jan 29, 2006
    Posts: 10,229

    krylon32
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from Nebraska
    1. Central Nebraska H.A.M.B.

    I ran a dead perch on my deuce roadster back in the 80's worked great. That roadster was kinda unusual for the times as it had the dead perch front and 1/4 elliptic s in the rear. One of the best driving and riding roadsters I have built.
     
  20. The shackle is facing in the wrong direction, spring in front the shackle should be dropping down. A way to remember this is that when you want to lower a car with spring in front (or behind on the rear) to install longer shackles thus dropping the spring eyes lower in relation to the axle center line.
     
  21. chiro
    Joined: Jun 23, 2008
    Posts: 1,254

    chiro
    Member

    So who makes that "triangle" shock mount thingy that replaces the end plate on the shackle and will that work on an AV8 with drop axle instead of welding a bung to Henry's steel?

    thanks,

    Andy
     
  22. I recognize the setup I think its called a dead perch or something like that, you have one dead side and the other has a shackle. I can never remember which side is dead though, I want to say steering box side but I am no doubt wrong about that.
     
  23. This was my old mordoor sedan. HRP

    [​IMG]
     
  24. They make two versions of the dead man perch,the one that DDD posted and this type that is show on the last post.HRP

    upload_2015-3-11_13-14-29.jpeg
     
  25. okiedokie
    Joined: Jul 5, 2005
    Posts: 4,890

    okiedokie
    Member
    from Ok

    Chassis Engineering.
     
  26. Since you all are on the topic......I think my shackles are at the wrong angle.? In this picture I do have the vehicle on jack stands but if it's on the ground, my shackle angle only slightly angle OUT. I want the front height raised anyway so I was going to swap out the "reverse eye" with a "regular eye" spring. If I'm hearing you all correctly, my resting shackle angle should be 45 degree facing inwards.....right? I know Posie has a method (King Pin center to center and Spring Perch center to center) to measure so I will follow that.
     

    Attached Files:

  27. Your spring is too wide. JW
     
  28. mike bowling
    Joined: Jan 1, 2013
    Posts: 3,559

    mike bowling
    Member

    I know it ain't Vern Tardel, but the "Speedway" catalog has some charts referencing perch centers and spring length. Also says that under load, shackles should sit at 40-45* . I don't have the accumulated knowledge of some of youse guys , so this helped me out. Good luck with it- your avatar is freakin' KILLER, Mr . Roothawg!
     
  29. clem
    Joined: Dec 20, 2006
    Posts: 4,474

    clem
    Member

    maybe a bit late, but dont forget to put the nut back on the perch bolt!
     
  30. ago
    Joined: Oct 12, 2005
    Posts: 2,198

    ago
    Member
    from pgh. pa.

    The opinions out today, say the front panhard works better than a dead perch. Also with a front panhard the shackle angle is not as critical. More vertical angle on the shackle lets the leaf spring work more freely. So if your shackle ends more straight up and down, it should not matter much.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.