Register now to get rid of these ads!

Hot Rods Power pac

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by Huckster59, Dec 3, 2024.

  1. Huckster59
    Joined: Aug 21, 2008
    Posts: 566

    Huckster59
    Member

    I’m having my 283 built. Pretty sure it has power pack heads heads. Needs bored for sure. Going to be 4 speed behind it,302 intake or 62 vette intake. Not sure on difference,have a set of 461and 462 heads and the power pac heads. Which one would work best? Wanting just a small cam also , Not racing just a little thump. Also anybody have info on these rotors? IMG_1778.jpeg IMG_1773.jpeg IMG_1778.jpeg IMG_1773.jpeg Thanks
     

    Attached Files:

    Sharpone likes this.
  2. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 60,051

    squirrel
    Member

    Power Pack heads have the triangle on the end. The valves and ports are smaller than the "double hump" 461 or 462 heads. PP heads work great up to about 5000 rpm, the bigger heads work better at higher rpm.

    I have the original PP heads on the 250 hp 327 in my 62 Vette, with the "small" intake and "small" WCFB carb, with a mild cam. It has the same torque as the higher performance engines, and pulls great up to about 5000 rpm. It would make more power if I put bigger heads, intake, carb, and cam in it...but it turns out that driving it around how it is is plenty fun, and it gets decent gas mileage, too.

    So, think about what you want out of the car. If you want to get that extra 100 hp from using that extra 2000 rpm from 5000-7000, then you want a bigger cam, bigger heads, and bigger intake. If not, then keep it small.

    also, having more cubic inches really helps the torque, and you'll be missing out on that with the 283 vs going to a 327 or something.
     
    tractorguy and Sharpone like this.
  3. jaracer
    Joined: Oct 4, 2008
    Posts: 3,062

    jaracer
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    All I can say is those are the strangest looking heads I've ever seen.
     
  4. How much is the 283 being bored?
     
  5. 1971BB427
    Joined: Mar 6, 2010
    Posts: 9,846

    1971BB427
    Member
    from Oregon

    If I had all three pairs of heads I'd always choose to go with either of the camel hump heads. But be sure those heads with larger valves clear the cylinder walls on a 283 bore! I know the 1.94"/1.60" valves will, but not sure the 2.02" valves will.
     
  6. Huckster59
    Joined: Aug 21, 2008
    Posts: 566

    Huckster59
    Member

  7. 1934coupe
    Joined: Feb 22, 2007
    Posts: 5,266

    1934coupe
    Member

    I would put the 1.94" valve head not any 2.02". You will be much happier with them.

    Pat
     
    SS327 likes this.
  8. HEATHEN
    Joined: Nov 22, 2005
    Posts: 9,060

    HEATHEN
    Member
    from SIDNEY, NY

    If you're having the power pack heads redone anyway, a good compromise would be to replace the stock 1.72 inch intake valves with 1.84 inch valves from a 305 H.O. engine.
     
    05snopro440 likes this.
  9. 05snopro440
    Joined: Mar 15, 2011
    Posts: 3,057

    05snopro440
    Member

    The 2.02 valves are too large in the 283 bore and will hit the cylinder unless you bore it way out, which has its own risks.

    The Power Paks with 1.84 valves is what I'm planning on for my 283 for a nice responsive street build.
     
  10. Huckster59
    Joined: Aug 21, 2008
    Posts: 566

    Huckster59
    Member

    Are these power pack with heads image.jpg image.jpg image.jpg
     
    silent rick likes this.
  11. Huckster59
    Joined: Aug 21, 2008
    Posts: 566

    Huckster59
    Member

  12. Huckster59
    Joined: Aug 21, 2008
    Posts: 566

    Huckster59
    Member

    image.jpg
     

    Attached Files:

  13. patsurf
    Joined: Jan 18, 2018
    Posts: 2,595

    patsurf

    Algoma56 likes this.
  14. Huckster59
    Joined: Aug 21, 2008
    Posts: 566

    Huckster59
    Member

    Ok. I was reading you can’t run 461 heads on a 283. Is that correct?
     
  15. DDDenny
    Joined: Feb 6, 2015
    Posts: 22,603

    DDDenny
    Member
    from oregon

    They work with the 1.94 intake valve version, the 2.02's require the eyebrow in the bore.
     
    Algoma56 likes this.
  16. Fordors
    Joined: Sep 22, 2016
    Posts: 6,553

    Fordors
    Member

    ‘461’s got the 2.02 valves in 1964 for the 365 and 375 horse 327’s and those valves need a 4 inch bore so there’s no interference. Keep in mind earlier ‘461 castings could have been updated with 2.02’s.
     
    Algoma56 likes this.
  17. joel
    Joined: Oct 10, 2009
    Posts: 2,753

    joel
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    I'm thinking PP heads were about 57cc combustion chamber volume. After 59 or 60 the "diamond" casting mark had larger combustion volume so a compression loss for a 283. I had occasion to install an L79 cam in a legit '57 Chevy with power pack engine with a C AFB on the stock manifold using an adapter. It ran great until I pulled a rocker arm stud.
     
    Algoma56 and Fordors like this.
  18. oldsmobum
    Joined: Apr 26, 2012
    Posts: 349

    oldsmobum
    Member
    from SoCal

    This, but make sure the machine shop actually opens the throats up too or the whole operation is pointless. There are a few unscrupulous eBay sellers that list 305 heads with “big valves” and no additional work done.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.