Register now to get rid of these ads!

Projects Project 333 [Half Evil] a Mid Engine Roadster DragCar started finally.

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by Littleman, Dec 31, 2011.

  1. Thought so... just wasn't sure how they handled that issue.

    Glad you are able to work with them during the build!!

    Get her stickered!
     
  2. studeboy
    Joined: Feb 12, 2003
    Posts: 539

    studeboy
    Member

    I wanna be like Dave when I grow up. Awesome build
     
  3. DaddyO's..Deuce
    Joined: Jul 31, 2011
    Posts: 786

    DaddyO's..Deuce
    Member
    from Missery

    So do you call yourself OCD, or just detail oriented?:p:D;) looking good!
     
  4. Candy-Man
    Joined: Mar 21, 2006
    Posts: 1,715

    Candy-Man
    Member

    Dave : Do you require "bead lock" rims for all blown : alcohol/nitro cars ? Or is there an exemption for nostalgia cars ? As you now require a floater rear end... Just thinking....

    Burn Down Tubes ?

    Looks Awsome.....
     
  5. dreracecar
    Joined: Aug 27, 2009
    Posts: 3,476

    dreracecar
    Member
    from so-cal

    Where do these people come up with all these rules?????

    ET rules (7.50 and slower) only require aftermarket axles and spool, in fact according to Heritage Rules , My blown alcohol car that runs 7.0 only requires aftermarket axles and spool and beadlocks only come in when you declare yourself as running A/Fuel, That was a stupid rule caused by a A/Fuel racer running a damaged rim and the tire came off the bead during a burnout.My car does the same burnout with the same tire but I dont need a beadlock. The big issue with them is with the 15" in/out beadlocks is that they dont clear the brake caliper, so in effect one must reduce braking effectiveness in order to satisfy a rule that happened once 8 years ago.
     

    Attached Files:

  6. Littleman
    Joined: Aug 25, 2004
    Posts: 2,643

    Littleman
    Alliance Member
    from OHIO, USA

    I had just enough 1-5/8'' .083 tubing left to make up two more hoops, w/ about 3'' of trim left at each end of the tube......But got lucky and made them correct the first time around...I was ready to fight it since my originals measured, bent and fit so well the first time.......I also changed from a six point and made this one a five point.....I need to make up the side helmet bars and weld it up..........I am happy with this over my first one, more sleeker and has better overall flow and still has the front 4'' face of helmet to front hoop measurement outside edge requirement......Littleman

    New side profile......

    [​IMG]

    Old cage front shot..6 point

    [​IMG]


    New cage front shot...5 point

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
  7. H.G. Wells
    Joined: Mar 11, 2006
    Posts: 386

    H.G. Wells
    Member

    Not that the first one was bad, but this is much improved. I believe the 5pt cage on mine was made with a 6" radius. very nice.
     
  8. 60srailjob
    Joined: Nov 14, 2008
    Posts: 1,218

    60srailjob
    Member
    from nowhere

    looking good........studing your pictures so post more....
     
  9. Littleman
    Joined: Aug 25, 2004
    Posts: 2,643

    Littleman
    Alliance Member
    from OHIO, USA

    Pics while wearing the helmet in the new cage top........Looks like I could have angled the top plane down in the front a little more....That OCD thing is kicking in...I am starting to twitch..ha ha ha.........I will save that for the FED that I will bend up next...I am thinking of using 1-1/4'' Dia. tube for what would normally be 1'' tube size for the helmet bars all the way around...but need to find a 7'' radius die to match the shoulder hoop radius in the corners...1'' just looks small, then again I wonder where you buy them flat pads I seen guys have on the inside of their helmet bars that go all the way around, that would look bigger...Littleman Dave

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
  10. Kenneth S
    Joined: Dec 15, 2007
    Posts: 1,526

    Kenneth S
    Member

    1 1/8" X .058" wall also works good for helmet bars. That 5 point cage makes it look a whole lot better.
     
  11. H.G. Wells
    Joined: Mar 11, 2006
    Posts: 386

    H.G. Wells
    Member

  12. New cage looks perfect, angles make it look way 'sleeker' and tapered. :)
     
  13. LZ
    Joined: Sep 9, 2007
    Posts: 618

    LZ
    Member

    Very nice Dave. Thanks for sharing. Hey just wondering what do you have for a Bender?
    thanks
    Luke
     
  14. Littleman
    Joined: Aug 25, 2004
    Posts: 2,643

    Littleman
    Alliance Member
    from OHIO, USA

    LZ, I bought my bender long ago from ChuckSmiths Motorsports, I believe it to be nothing more than a 1st or 2nd generation re-badged JD Square bender...which is nothing more than a Hossfield knock off.....It works great for the backyard shop....If I did this for a living, I would invest into a nicer bender like most of the guys making a living bending tubing crafting cool stuff everyday....

    Kenneth S, using 1-1/8'' is a good thought, I just had thoughts of using 1-1/4'' because I had some..I will check w/ the local chassis guy if he has some, maybe he has the 7'' radius die I want to use for either size.

    Cand-Man, looks like dreracecar answered your question, I am learning about all this as I go along...Lucky to have some guys on the Hamb w/ some real world knowledge about this stuff ! and they are willing to give out advice......Looks like to me once you cross over into Advanced E.T....everything changes and lots of upgrades are demanded.....I plan on making up some rim screws for the rear rims ......I have Strange 35 spline gun drilled axles w/ 5/8'' studs and spool.....It should live, if not I will need to upgrade whatever fails.

    H.G. Wells, thanks for the info on them helmet bar pads, I plan on looking into them!

    Thanks everyone.....I am finally happy w/ how everything looks....To be truthfull I have not slept well since the end of November when I placed the car on the ground......I have been waiting to change the helmet bars around since then...sometimes it is down right silly what keeps me up at night.........Like Daddy O's..Deuce mentioned possible OCD problem...I laughed...then thought he is probably correct......but it is all about the details! I am going to weld the hoops in tomarrow...if I don't do this I will probably mess w/ them again...I need to get the body mounted soon.........

    Littleman........
     
  15. LZ
    Joined: Sep 9, 2007
    Posts: 618

    LZ
    Member

    Dave:
    Just a thought if you dont mind.
    The ISP pads are nice but take up some room in the cage and accounted for. They require a plate to be fabed -fitted and sent to the Mfg'r. Think about the thickness of these while you have your helmet in position.
    Also, if you go the padding route (sfi 45.1) . Stuff I have experienced is a bit stiff. Have heard that there is some stuff on the market now that is more flexible and also a dual durometer type . Just a FYI.
    A local dude had a FED built (Roo)and he had some shots as the back plate was being fitted (ISP). Will look for it and post it for your ref.
    Luke
     
  16. Kenneth S
    Joined: Dec 15, 2007
    Posts: 1,526

    Kenneth S
    Member

  17. Dave, those flat pads are ISP Safety helmet pad systems. Very nice stuff that al the big guys use. Normal SFI cage "padding" if you can call it that is a joke. This stuff works AND pads. Also look at Orange Aid cage padding, looks like the normal stuff but really work, designed by a racer/brain surgeon. Literally
     
  18. dreracecar
    Joined: Aug 27, 2009
    Posts: 3,476

    dreracecar
    Member
    from so-cal

    It is totally un-nessary to go any bigger than 1" on the helmet bars. ISP will allow you to make your own mounting plates as long as you follow their guidlines. MY car has a narrow 5-point cage and their normal pad system would not work. I made my own plates that are 1 1/2" wide and had ISP make the padding 3/4" thick and they have a current cert on them.
     
  19. Littleman
    Joined: Aug 25, 2004
    Posts: 2,643

    Littleman
    Alliance Member
    from OHIO, USA

    My whole car is over built per the min. required, more than likely I will end using 1''...just looks small and out of proportion to me...thats all.......my FED will be on a diet...this one not so much..Thanks for the info on ISP.......

    I was looking at the two pics you posted of your FED...when you driver is suited up, strapped in and has the helmet on...does he have the 4'' required clearance from your outside edge of the front hoop to the helmet ?...Just noticed the cage is not that deep or atleast appears that way in the pic........good looking machine...Dave
     
  20. dreracecar
    Joined: Aug 27, 2009
    Posts: 3,476

    dreracecar
    Member
    from so-cal

    I could never understand anyones theory about overbuilding the spec.. Minimum spec on cars that weigh over 2000# and going over 300mph @1000' seem more that enough, and are designed to crush and bend, whereas larger and heavier wont and the driver takes all the energy. One is not adding any overall safety, just weight and effort to build the thing. If I went to a .065 shoulder hoop, that would meen I would have to turn down the upper frame rail so it would telescope together. Now by using .058 (minimun spec) the two telescope together with zero effort and the percentage difference would not even be on the charts. Most other chassie builders will tell you that they will use .083 for the cages because its stronger. The only thing I can tell you that it is easier for them to bend because there bender wont bend .065 without crushing it.The other thing is that if the driver has to be cut out of the car I would rather it be easy for the track crew to do rather than using somthing that makes it harder and delaying the rescue. There is one area on my car that I overbuild and that is the motorplate upright as it calls for 1 1/4x .049 and I use .058 because its the only .049 the spec calls out for as a minimum and I dont need to have a whole stick hanging around just for that.

    As far as the 4" that all depends on where you measure from, If there is padding on the rear upright and whether the drivers moves his head forward during the launch or not. I have never seen anybody measure this because a helmeted driver in not in the car while being either teched or certed. The starter may say somthing if he notices the helmet sticking out of the cage but that is rare. Interesting note, (and this is from an NHRA official) "Every car must have current spec seat belts installed in the cars" but one does not have to use them and legaley they cannot touch them while your seated in the car.
     
  21. Littleman
    Joined: Aug 25, 2004
    Posts: 2,643

    Littleman
    Alliance Member
    from OHIO, USA

    Good info for my future FED build........As far as 1-5/8'' .083 or .065 wall thickness.....the only thing that matters on both to me are the welds.. that will make or break you. My bender bends .065'' w/ no un-seen problems...but my shoulder hoop and both lower rails I used 1-5/8'' .083...I figured this car could use the weight...and not for impact purposes, but I am in my cars crumple zone.....My FED I want as light as possible and plan on telescoping the rails...I have seen FED's that weight over 1,800 lbs and running wire wheels when they should not be based on the rule.......some heavier and not much different than a purpose built door car weight wise....I find some of the rules funny because they are not maintained at the track...
     
    Last edited: Jan 6, 2013
  22. Littleman
    Joined: Aug 25, 2004
    Posts: 2,643

    Littleman
    Alliance Member
    from OHIO, USA

    I made up the steering support....need to still make up the 1'' helmet bars.....I made up another lower rail crossmember that will be placed between the lower rails real close to the rear of the verticle chassis rearend mounts...this should add allot of strength to this area...it was dreracecar that pointed out that I could hurt this area during a hard launch.....I will do something on top as well.......getting close to being able to finish weld the entire chassis atleast what is left......Then mount the seat and belts, tank, chute, make pedals, mount fire bottle, make mid plate struts, mount main body, shocks and everything else...so much to do...so little time.....I found a 27 Roadster glass hood, hood sides and track nose on craigslist...something to play with and cut up for an idea....Littleman

    [​IMG]


    [​IMG]
     
  23. dragsled
    Joined: May 12, 2011
    Posts: 1,975

    dragsled
    Member
    from Panama IA

    Great work Dave, Tim Jones
     
  24. Saxxon
    Joined: Dec 14, 2008
    Posts: 1,834

    Saxxon
    Member

    I have never been so excited to see the finished product for someone elses car...like I am for this one.

    Just makes me sick how good this thing is compared to my junk
    Serious "attaboy" there Dave
     
  25. woodbutcher
    Joined: Apr 25, 2012
    Posts: 3,309

    woodbutcher
    Member

    :D Hi Dave.Very nice.Some OP`s have said its out of the box thinking.The`re right.Its so far out of the box,you can`t even SEE the box from where you`re at.Keep up the good work.
    Good luck.Have fun.Be safe.
    Leo
     
  26. Littleman
    Joined: Aug 25, 2004
    Posts: 2,643

    Littleman
    Alliance Member
    from OHIO, USA

    Not too much to update...I have been working allot at work.....I now have the helmet bars in place, seat mounts are tacted in. Along with all the belt mounts tacted and in place. Gas pedal mount is tacted in place as well........need to figure out brake pedal and master cylinder mount next......I also ordered up some Team3 Fuel rear type wheels, they will look more 60's.and swapped out the M/T slicks that are 11'' wide for a new et of M/T's that are 13.5'' wide...will have plenty of tire out back now..and will need to cut the body up even more...Littleman

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Feb 18, 2013
  27. lowkroozer
    Joined: Jun 1, 2006
    Posts: 601

    lowkroozer
    Member

    Good lookin build,,,,I'll be watching
     
  28. Littleman
    Joined: Aug 25, 2004
    Posts: 2,643

    Littleman
    Alliance Member
    from OHIO, USA

    Tonight I got the brake pedal roughed in.......still need to place two bends in the actual swing arm to move the pedal pad inboard.It does not look like much..but I have some time machining this thing, it swings great and has no play and is all chromoly....Hope it works when it is in place w/ the master.....if not I will need to come up w/ another idea........I am hurting for space now......Littleman

    [​IMG]
     
  29. slinginrods
    Joined: Oct 6, 2008
    Posts: 422

    slinginrods
    Member
    from florida

    Looks awesome,how about a handbrake?
     
  30. dragsled
    Joined: May 12, 2011
    Posts: 1,975

    dragsled
    Member
    from Panama IA

    I know what you mean about the tight space, everytime I would add something in my cockpit and test the fit,, ,I'd think MAN you gotta lose some weight!!!:D Tim Jones
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.