Register now to get rid of these ads!

1952-59 Ford Question on air shocks.

Discussion in 'Off Topic Hot Rods & Customs' started by evintho, Mar 26, 2022.

  1. evintho
    Joined: May 28, 2007
    Posts: 2,597

    evintho
    Member

    I'm thinking about putting air shocks on the back of my '54 because I want to control and adjust the rake. The original tube shocks measure 11-1/2" compressed and 20" extended. The distance between upper and lower shock mounts on the car is 17-1/2". I was looking at these Gabriel Hi-Jackers that say they'll fit a '54 Customline but the extended length is just a hair over 18". That doesn't seem to be high enough. Does anyone have any thoughts or recommendations?
    https://www.amazon.com/Gabriel-4910...el+hi-jackers+49105+air+shocks,aps,165&sr=8-2
     
  2. frnkeore
    Joined: Aug 16, 2019
    Posts: 241

    frnkeore
    Member

    With the weight on the rear wheels, it is 17.5" between the shock mounts, leaving only 2.5" of travel, left on the stock shocks?
     
    evintho likes this.
  3. JeffB2
    Joined: Dec 18, 2006
    Posts: 9,669

    JeffB2
    Member
    from Phoenix,AZ

    Last edited: Mar 26, 2022
    Rui and evintho like this.
  4. okiedokie
    Joined: Jul 5, 2005
    Posts: 4,968

    okiedokie
    Member
    from Ok

    I have the Hijackers on my Sunliner along with the 2" extenders and they work fine. I have Posies lowering rear springs so I wanted to be able to compensate for my wife's luggage when we make trips.
     
    JeffB2 and evintho like this.
  5. ezrodder1
    Joined: Nov 2, 2007
    Posts: 75

    ezrodder1
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Are the extenders installed on upper shock mount or lower?
     
    evintho likes this.
  6. shortshift
    Joined: Nov 7, 2013
    Posts: 350

    shortshift
    Member

    I put mine on the top. Out of site. No problem with them there.. SO FAR
     
    JeffB2 and evintho like this.
  7. evintho
    Joined: May 28, 2007
    Posts: 2,597

    evintho
    Member

    That is correct. The shocks may have been replaced at some time. They're very rusty but I do see a hint of Monroe blue paint on one of them.

    Jeff, those extensions you listed are 3". Should I go with 3" or try to find some 2"? I plan to run 17" wheels in the back so I'll need to drop the suspension to change a tire also.
     
  8. JeffB2
    Joined: Dec 18, 2006
    Posts: 9,669

    JeffB2
    Member
    from Phoenix,AZ

    In that case an extra inch may be of help.
     
  9. bobss396
    Joined: Aug 27, 2008
    Posts: 18,835

    bobss396
    Member

    That's what SHE said... :D:D
     
    Rui, JeffB2 and Dos Cincos like this.
  10. jimmy six
    Joined: Mar 21, 2006
    Posts: 17,479

    jimmy six
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    I realize what what’s needed but extenders are a weak link in shock absorber use. Use the shortest you can. On solid rear ends, not independent, its best if they are mounter almost vertical but we don’t control that.
     
    evintho likes this.
  11. bobss396
    Joined: Aug 27, 2008
    Posts: 18,835

    bobss396
    Member

    I recall around 1975, one place I worked fixed more than a few GTOs and Novas with the extenders ripped out, mostly on one side. We came up with an ingenious fix and made $$ on them.
     
    evintho likes this.
  12. okiedokie
    Joined: Jul 5, 2005
    Posts: 4,968

    okiedokie
    Member
    from Ok

    Well, what was the fix.
     
    evintho likes this.
  13. evintho
    Joined: May 28, 2007
    Posts: 2,597

    evintho
    Member

    I don't intend to autocross this thing but I'm not a fan of weak links at all. Any insight on your ingenious fix bobss396? I'm all ears!
    BTW, I just bought the 49105's off Ebay, brand new and shipped $75. Score!
     
  14. nosford
    Joined: Feb 7, 2011
    Posts: 1,131

    nosford
    Member

    I worked in a tire store/dealer environment in the 70's and air shocks were all the rage. Jack the *** up and hang the widest tire and wheel combination you could even if it hung outside the fender. People were lifting the car up so high that the springs were not doing much at all and the weight was all on the air shocks. The shock mounts were not designed to carry this much weight and often failed but if you kept things within reason they did fine. On my 55 at the time I ran a Monroe coil over shock (load leveler) for a Mustang with a 2 inch extension and never had a problem but it was just an ***ist for the weak/sagging leaf springs. I wasn't trying to vary the "rake" with the shock, anything other than small changes wouldn't be wise in my opinion. Wrong tool for the job!
     
    bobss396 and jimmy six like this.
  15. bobss396
    Joined: Aug 27, 2008
    Posts: 18,835

    bobss396
    Member

    Since the plate, especially on the unibody Novas tore out, we made up new plates that were thicker and had our welder s***ch them in. We made them extra long and trimmed to fit.
     
  16. guthriesmith
    Joined: Aug 17, 2006
    Posts: 12,688

    guthriesmith
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Joe, did you just use Hijackers that were called out for the car? I think I may need to do the same since I am planning to lower the rear of my car a little more now that I am not hauling 6 people and luggage as often. I would like it to be a little lower with just me in it but would also like to keep my driveshaft off my tunnel when I may occasionally have a full car and trunk.
     
  17. okiedokie
    Joined: Jul 5, 2005
    Posts: 4,968

    okiedokie
    Member
    from Ok

    Yep, that is what I did Chris.#49105
     
    guthriesmith likes this.

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.